Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/763,188

INFLATABLE TENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
FISHER, AUDREY BARBARA
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-52.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
7
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
62.5%
+22.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status This is in response to the application filed on July 3, 2024. Claims 1-9 are pending. Claims 1-9 stand rejected as set forth below. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Healy (WO 2014080391 A1). In regard to Claim 1, Healy discloses an inflatable tent which is compact and portable, the inflatable tent (Fig 1) comprises: a base (bottom sheet portion 23) and walls (top sheet portion 22) forming an enclosure (Fig 2); a door (door flaps 7,8) configured on a front wall (top sheet portion 22) of the walls; and a bedding (mattress 2) coupled to an upper surface of the base (bottom sheet portion 23) (Fig 1), wherein the bedding is inflatable (pg 4), the bedding comprises one or more inflatable pillows (a pillow 11) and an inflatable mattress (Fig 5), wherein the inflatable tent is configured to automatically pop up to erect from a folded state (pg 7, 10). In regard to Claim 2, Healy discloses wherein the door (door flaps 7,8) is secured using a zipper (pg 10). In regard to Claim 9, Healy discloses a method for taking rest during travel, the method comprises: providing an inflatable tent, the inflatable tent comprises (Fig 1): a base (bottom sheet portion 23) and walls (top sheet portion 22) forming an enclosure (Fig 2); a door (door flaps 7,8) configured on a front wall (top sheet portion 22) of the walls (pg 2); and a bedding (mattress 2) coupled to an upper surface of the base (bottom sheet portion 23) (Fig 1), wherein the bedding is inflatable (pg 4), the bedding comprises one or more inflatable pillows (a pillow 11) and an inflatable mattress (Fig 5), wherein the inflatable tent is configured to automatically pop up to erect from a folded state (pg 10, 17); removing the inflatable tent from a casing; erecting of the inflatable tent (pg 10, 17). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Healy as applied above, and in further view of Smith (US 20160286982 A1). In regard to Claim 3, Healy discloses the inflatable tent as described above, but does not disclose an anchor on the base of the tent that secures the zipper. Smith teaches wherein the inflatable tent further comprises an anchor (carabiner 68) on the base near the front wall, wherein the anchor (carabiner 68) is configured to secure the zipper (zipper 38) in a closed state (closed position) of the door (Fig 9) [0036]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the inflatable tent as disclosed by Healy to include an anchor that secures the zipper. Additionally, it would have been obvious to move the anchor to inside the tent in order to increase the safety and security of individuals within the tent. Claim 4-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Healy. In regard to Claim 4, Healy discloses the inflatable tent as described above, but does not disclose a luggage space between the mattress and front wall of the tent. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include space at the foot of the inflatable mattress in order to have an area for storing luggage in. In regard to Claim 5, Healy discloses wherein the one or more inflatable pillows (pillow 11) and the inflatable mattress (mattress 2) comprises a common inflation port (secondary air valve 13) (pg 7, 8), wherein the one or more pillows (pillow 11) are attached to a top surface of the inflatable mattress (mattress 2) and the inflatable mattress is attached to the base (bottom sheet portion 23) (pg 7, 9). In regard to Claim 6, Healy discloses wherein the inflatable tent further comprises one or more pockets (transparent flap 42) configured in an extended side portion of the inflatable mattress (pg 13). In regard to Claim 7, Healy discloses wherein the inflatable tent further comprises one or more pockets (transparent flap 42) configured in a side wall of the walls of the inflatable tent (pg 13). In regard to Claim 8, Healy discloses wherein the inflatable tent further comprises a mesh window (top vent 39) configured in one wall of the walls of the inflatable tent (pg 13). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Audrey Fisher whose telephone number is (571)272-2849. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 7:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at 571-270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Audrey Fisher/Examiner, Art Unit 3635 /BRIAN D MATTEI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month