Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/763,254

METHODS, ARCHITECTURES, APPARATUSES AND SYSTEMS FOR SENSING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
THIEU, BENJAMIN M
Art Unit
2453
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 631 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the original filing of July 3, 2024. Claim(s) 1-16 is/are pending and have been considered as follows. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 6/5/2025 & 11/25/2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim(s) 1 is/are objected to because of the following informalities: As to Claim 1, the 6th limitation recites “receiving, from the wireless network based on the sub-band request, second configuration information indicative of which of the plurality of CSI-RS resources are to be used for sensing measurements;; and”, the Examiner suggests “receiving, from the wireless network based on the sub-band request, second configuration information indicative of which of the plurality of CSI-RS resources are to be used for sensing measurements;[[;]] and”; Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Beigi et al. (WO 2024/025731 A1, hereinafter Beigi). As to Claim 1, Beigi discloses a method performed by a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU), the method comprising: receiving, from a wireless network, first configuration information indicative of a Channel State Information-Reference Signal (CSI-RS) sub-band configuration, at least one first criterion and at least one second criterion ((Beigi; [0094-0098, 0130-0131]), where Beigi discloses sending/receiving CSI-RS configurations.); performing channel state estimation measurements on a plurality of CSI-RS resources ((Beigi; [0094-0098, 0103]), where Beigi discloses sending/receiving CSI-RS configurations. The CSI maybe include parameters required to be measured and reported.); identifying a set of sub-band options from the plurality of CSI-RS resources that satisfy the at least one first criterion based at least in part on the channel state estimation measurements and on the CSI-RS sub-band configuration ((Beigi; [0146-0147]), where Beigi discloses periodicity of reporting LOS probability/indication upon detection of an obstacle.); identifying a subset of the identified set of sub-band options that satisfy the at least one second criterion ((Beigi; [0147]), where Beigi discloses reporting LOS/NLOS probability/indication upon detection of event. A determination can be made based on the configured threshold for the resource.); transmitting, to the wireless network, a sub-band request ((Beigi; [0131]), where Beigi discloses indication of sub-band information.); receiving, from the wireless network based on the sub-band request, second configuration information indicative of which of the plurality of CSI-RS resources are to be used for sensing measurements; and performing the sensing measurements based on the second configuration information ((Beigi; [0146]), where Beigi discloses periodicity of reporting of LOS probability/indication maybe be configured to be higher than the periodicity of reporting of NLOS probability/indication upon detection of an obstacle. Reporting can be increased until conditions are restored.). As to Claim 2, Beigi discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting, to the wireless network, sensing information based at least in part on the sensing measurements ((Beigi; [0147]), where Beigi discloses reporting LOS/NLOS probability/indication upon detection of an event.). As to Claim 3, Beigi discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the at least one first criterion comprises at least one of: a highest number of Resource Element (RE) for a sensing task, a highest sensing task accuracy and/or a lowest uncertainty range in a sensing task (Beigi; [0140, 0165]). As to Claim 4, Beigi discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the at least one second criterion comprises at least one of: an accuracy associated with a sensing task, number of measurements for a sensing task or a time duration for measurements for a sensing task, with respect to a probability threshold (Beigi; [0140, 0165]). As to Claim 5, Beigi discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the sub-band request comprises information associated with at least one of the identified set of sub-band options, the identified subset of the set of sub-band options, the channel state estimation measurements, the at least one first criterion, or the at least one second criterion (Beigi; [0130-0131, 0209]). As to Claim 6, Beigi discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the first configuration information is further indicative of at least one of channel state estimation measurement configuration, sensing measurement configurations, CSI- RS configuration, or the set of sub-band options (Beigi; [0130-0131, 0209]). As to Claim 7, Beigi discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the second configuration information comprises information indicative of which of the plurality of CSI-RS resources are to be used for channel state estimation (Beigi; [0130-0131, 0209]). As to Claim 8, Beigi discloses the method of claim 3, wherein: the sensing task comprises performing measurements on at least one of the plurality of CSI-RS resources, wherein the at least one of the plurality of CSI-RS resources is one of CSI-RS resources or sensing resources ((Beigi; [0146]), where Beigi discloses periodicity of reporting of LOS probability/indication maybe be configured to be higher than the periodicity of reporting of NLOS probability/indication upon detection of an obstacle. Reporting can be increased until conditions are restored.). As to Claim 9, Beigi discloses a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) comprising: a processer (Beigi; [0005, 0032]), and a transceiver coupled to the processer (Beigi; [0005, 0032]), wherein the WTRU is to: receive, from a wireless network, first configuration information indicative of a Channel State Information-Reference Signal (CSI-RS) sub-band configuration, at least one first criterion and at least one second criterion ((Beigi; [0094-0098, 0130-0131]), where Beigi discloses sending/receiving CSI-RS configurations.); perform channel state estimation measurements on a plurality of CSI-RS resources ((Beigi; [0094-0098, 0130-0131]), where Beigi discloses sending/receiving CSI-RS configurations.); identify a set of sub-band options from the plurality of CSI-RS resources that satisfy the at least one first criterion based at least in part on the channel state estimation measurements and on the CSI-RS sub-band configuration ((Beigi; [0146-0147]), where Beigi discloses periodicity of reporting LOS probability/indication upon detection of an obstacle.); identify a subset of the identified set of sub-band options that satisfy the at least one second criterion ((Beigi; [0147]), where Beigi discloses reporting LOS/NLOS probability/indication upon detection of event. A determination can be made based on the configured threshold for the resource.); transmit, to the wireless network, a sub-band request ((Beigi; [0131]), where Beigi discloses indication of sub-band information.); receive, from the wireless network based on the sub-band request, second configuration information indicative of which of the plurality of CSI-RS resources are to be used for sensing measurements; and perform the sensing measurements based on the second configuration information ((Beigi; [0146]), where Beigi discloses periodicity of reporting of LOS probability/indication maybe be configured to be higher than the periodicity of reporting of NLOS probability/indication upon detection of an obstacle. Reporting can be increased until conditions are restored.). As to Claim 10, Beigi discloses the WTRU of claim 9, wherein the WTRU is further to: transmit, to the wireless network, sensing information based at least in part on the sensing measurements ((Beigi; [0147]), where Beigi discloses reporting LOS/NLOS probability/indication upon detection of an event.). As to Claim 11, Beigi discloses the WTRU of claim 9, wherein: the at least one first criterion comprises at least one of: a highest number of Resource Element (RE) for a sensing task, a highest sensing task accuracy and/or a lowest uncertainty range in a sensing task (Beigi; [0140, 0165]). As to Claim 12, Beigi discloses the WTRU of claim 9, wherein: the at least one second criterion comprises at least one of: an accuracy associated with a sensing task, number of measurements for a sensing task or a time duration for measurements for a sensing task, with respect to a probability threshold (Beigi; [0140, 0165]). As to Claim 13, Beigi discloses the WTRU of claim 9, wherein: the sub-band request comprises information associated with at least one of the identified set of sub-band options, the identified subset of the set of sub-band options, the channel state estimation measurements, the at least one first criterion, or the at least one second criterion (Beigi; [0130-0131, 0209]). As to Claim 14, Beigi discloses the WTRU of claim 9, wherein: the first configuration information is further indicative of at least one of channel state estimation measurement configuration, sensing measurement configurations, CSI- RS configuration, or the set of sub-band options (Beigi; [0130-0131, 0209]). As to Claim 15, Beigi discloses the WTRU of claim 9, wherein: the second configuration information comprises information indicative of which of the plurality of CSI-RS resources are to be used for channel state estimation (Beigi; [0130-0131, 0209]). As to Claim 16, Beigi discloses the WTRU of claim 11, wherein: the sensing task comprises performing measurements on at least one of the plurality of CSI-RS resources, wherein the at least one of the plurality of CSI-RS resources is one of CSI-RS resources or sensing resources ((Beigi; [0146]), where Beigi discloses periodicity of reporting of LOS probability/indication maybe be configured to be higher than the periodicity of reporting of NLOS probability/indication upon detection of an obstacle. Reporting can be increased until conditions are restored.). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. The examiner also requests, in response to this Office action, support be shown for language added to any original claims on amendment and any new claims. That is, indicate support for newly added claim language by specifically pointing to page(s) and line no(s) in the specification and/or drawing figure(s). This will assist the examiner in prosecuting the application. When responding to this office action, Applicant is advised to clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He or she must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections See 37 CFR 1.111(c). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN M THIEU whose telephone number is (571) 270-7475 and fax number is (571) 270-8475. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kamal Divecha can be reached at 571-272-5863. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN M THIEU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2453 7.22.2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Oct 21, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771626
MANAGING TELEMETRY DATA USING A MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764180
SIZE-BASED DATA FILE PRIORITIZATION FOR DATA PACKAGE TRANSFERS
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762032
Spot Instance Instability Heatmaps
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756660
Slice Information Verification Method and Apparatus
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756903
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING COMMENT INFORMATION BASED ON LARGE MODEL, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month