Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/763,393

REFRIGERANT CIRCULATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Priority
Jul 05, 2023 — provisional 63/525,018
Examiner
VAZQUEZ, ANA M
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
NIDEC Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
710 granted / 888 resolved
+10.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
923
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 888 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 09/17/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-7 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bonnin (US 11,083,111). Regarding claim 1, Bonnin discloses a refrigerant circulation device (refer to figs.2 and 6), comprising: a primary flow path (7) serving as a flow path of a primary refrigerant; a secondary flow path (8) serving as a flow path of a secondary refrigerant; a heat exchanger (102) connected to the primary flow path and the secondary flow path; a pump (101) connected to the secondary flow path (8); and a housing (100, fig.6) including an accommodation region; wherein the accommodation region extends in a first direction (direction of side wall 131) and a second direction (direction of side wall 133) intersecting each other, and has a dimension longer in the first direction than in the second direction (refer to fig.6); the housing accommodates (refer to fig.6) the primary flow path (7), the secondary flow path (8), the heat exchanger (102), and the pump (101) in the accommodation region; an entirety of the heat exchanger (102) is positioned on one side in the second direction relative to the pump (101); the housing includes panels (133 and 134) arranged to oppose each other in the second direction with the accommodation region interposed therebetween; the heat exchanger (102) extends along one of the panels (131) such that a longitudinal direction of the heat exchanger extends in parallel with the first direction (in the direction of wall 131), the one of the panels being provided on the one side in the second direction; the heat exchanger (102) is provided with inlets and outlets for the primary refrigerant and the secondary refrigerant; and all of the inlets and outlets are arranged on a flow path connection surface provided on the other side in the second direction of the heat exchanger (on side wall 134 as can be seen from fig.6, wherein pipes 121 to 123 are from the secondary flow path 8, and pipes 124 and 125 from the primary flow path 7). Regarding claim 3, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 1. Further, Bonnin discloses wherein the pump (101) includes: a pump inlet serving as an inflow port of the secondary refrigerant (8); a pump outlet serving as an outflow port of the secondary refrigerant (8); a pump inlet-side flow path (refer to pipe 121 located upstream of the pump as in fig.6) connecting the pump inlet and the secondary flow path; and a pump outlet-side flow path (refer to pipe 122 located between the pump and the heat exchanger) connecting the pump outlet and the secondary flow path; and the pump inlet-side flow path (121) and the pump outlet-side flow path (122) extend in the first direction (the longer dimension) on the second direction side relative to the heat exchanger (refer to fig.6, wherein said paths extend in the first direction). Regarding claim 4, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 3. Further, Bonnin discloses wherein the housing includes a housing secondary outlet serving as an outflow port of the secondary refrigerant (outlet connecting pipe 123 through side wall 134); and a portion of the secondary flow path (8), the portion connecting the housing secondary outlet and the pump outlet extends in the first direction (the longer dimension) on the second direction side relative to the heat exchanger. Regarding claim 5, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 1. Further, Bonnin discloses wherein an entirety of the heat exchanger (102) is positioned on one side (from side wall 133 in the second direction and side wall 131 in the first direction) in the second direction relative to the pump (101); the heat exchanger includes: a HEX primary inlet (inlet through pipe 124 located upstream of the heat exchanger) connected to the primary flow path (7) and serving as an inflow port of the primary refrigerant; a HEX primary outlet (outlet through pipe 125 located downstream of the heat exchanger) connected to the primary flow path (7) and serving as an outflow port of the primary refrigerant; a HEX secondary inlet (inlet by means of pipe 122) connected to the secondary flow path (8) and serving as an inflow port of the secondary refrigerant; a HEX secondary outlet (outlet through pipe 123) connected to the secondary flow path (8) and serving as an outflow port of the secondary refrigerant; and a HEX housing including a flow path connection surface (said surface is considered to be an entirety of the walls forming the heat exchanger as in fig.6) on which the HEX primary inlet, the HEX primary outlet, the HEX secondary inlet, and the HEX secondary outlet are arranged; and the flow path connection surface opposes another side in the second direction (refer to fig.6 below, wherein at least a portion of the connection surface has two surfaces opposing one another). PNG media_image1.png 392 560 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 1. Further, Bonnin discloses a control circuit (103); wherein the housing accommodates the control circuit in the accommodation region (refer to fig.6); and the control circuit is in a portion of the accommodation region on a first direction side of the heat exchanger (refer to fig.6). Regarding claim 7, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 6. Further, Bonnin discloses wherein the control circuit (103) is in a portion of the accommodation region on a second direction side of the pump (101); and the control circuit is smaller in dimension in the first direction than the pump (refer to fig.6). Regarding claim 11, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 1. Further, Bonnin discloses wherein the secondary refrigerant flowing into the heat exchanger (102) through the secondary flow path is higher in temperature than the primary refrigerant flowing into the heat exchanger through the primary flow path (refer to fig.2 wherein the secondary flow path is capable of being higher in temperature than the primary refrigerant flowing into the heat exchanger through the primary flow path since it flows from computer servers 3); and the secondary flow path is positioned on one side in a third direction intersecting the first direction and the second direction relative to the primary flow path (vertically as can be seen from fig.6). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bonnin (US 11,083,111) in view of Chen (US 12,207,449). Regarding claim 2, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 1. Further, Bonnin discloses the pump (101) connected to the secondary flow path and an entirety of the heat exchanger (102) is positioned on one side in the second direction relative to the pump (refer to fig.6), but fails to explicitly disclose wherein the pump includes a plurality of pumps. However, Chen teaches a cooling apparatus for a server (refer to fig.1), comprising a plurality of pumps (40, 40a), wherein the plurality of pumps are provided for backup use in case where operation of the first pump is ceased, or may be used as an auxiliary pump (refer to col.4, lines 45-55). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Bonnin such that the pump includes a plurality of pumps in view of the teachings of Chen, in order to provide backup in case where operation of the first pump is ceased, or an auxiliary pump. Regarding claim 8, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 1. Further, Bonnin discloses the housing, but fails to explicitly disclose a power supply assembly, wherein the housing accommodates the power supply assembly in the accommodation region, and the power supply assembly is positioned away from the heat exchanger in the second direction and away from the pump in the first direction. However, Chen teaches a cooling apparatus for a server (refer to fig.2), comprising a power supply assembly (50), wherein a housing (100) accommodates the power supply assembly in an accommodation region, and the power supply assembly (50) is positioned away from a heat exchanger (10) in a second direction and away from a pump (40) in a first direction (refer to fig.2 below), in order to provide electrical power necessary for the operation of the cooling apparatus (refer to col.3, lines 23-25). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Bonnin by providing a power supply assembly as taught by Chen, wherein the housing accommodates the power supply assembly in the accommodation region, and the power supply assembly is positioned away from the heat exchanger in the second direction and away from the pump in the first direction, in order to provide electrical power necessary for the operation of the refrigerant circulation device. PNG media_image2.png 533 796 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 8. Further, Bonnin discloses wherein the heat exchanger (102) is on one side in the second direction; the power supply assembly (50 as taught by Chen) is arranged at an interval on another side in the second direction with respect to the heat exchanger; the housing includes: a housing primary inlet (inlet through side wall 134 from pipe 124 upstream of the heat exchanger) connected to the primary flow path (7) and serving as an inflow port of the primary refrigerant; a housing primary outlet (outlet through side wall 134 from pipe 125) connected to the primary flow path (7) and serving as an outflow port of the primary refrigerant; a housing secondary inlet (inlet through side wall 134 from pipe 121 located upstream of the pump as in fig.6) connected to the secondary flow path (8) and serving as an inflow port of the secondary refrigerant; and a housing secondary outlet (outlet through side wall 134 from pipe 123 located downstream of the heat exchanger) connected to the secondary flow path (8) and serving as an outflow port of the secondary refrigerant; and the housing primary inlet, the housing primary outlet, the housing secondary inlet, and the housing secondary outlet are arranged in the second direction between the heat exchanger and the power supply assembly (50 as taught by Chen). Regarding claim 10, Bonnin meets the claim limitations as disclosed above in the rejection of claim 1. Further, Bonnin discloses the secondary refrigerant, but fails to explicitly disclose a tank that stores a refrigerant used as the secondary refrigerant, wherein the housing accommodates the tank in the accommodation region, the tank is arranged such that at least a portion of the tank overlaps in a third direction with respect to the heat exchanger on one side of the third direction intersecting the first direction and the second direction relative to the heat exchanger, and the tank is connected in the third direction with respect to the secondary flow path. However, Chen teaches a cooling apparatus for a server (refer to fig.4), comprising a tank (90) that stores a refrigerant used as a secondary refrigerant (internal cooling loop 30), wherein a housing accommodates the tank (90) in an accommodation region, the tank (90) is arranged such that at least a portion of the tank overlaps in a third direction (vertically) with respect to a heat exchanger (10) on one side of the third direction intersecting a first direction and a second direction relative to the heat exchanger (10), and the tank is connected in the third direction with respect to a secondary flow path, in order to supply cooling fluid inside the internal cooling loop (refer to col.5, lines 24-28). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Bonnin by providing a tank as taught by Chen that stores a refrigerant used as the secondary refrigerant, wherein the housing accommodates the tank in the accommodation region, the tank is arranged such that at least a portion of the tank overlaps in a third direction with respect to the heat exchanger on one side of the third direction intersecting the first direction and the second direction relative to the heat exchanger, and the tank is connected in the third direction with respect to the secondary flow path, in order to supply cooling fluid inside the secondary flow path. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pp.7-11, filed on 09/17/2026, with respect to claims 1-11 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1-11 has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of newly amended claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANA M VAZQUEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-0611. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached at 571-272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANA M VAZQUEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 14, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768572
HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS WITH PRESSURE EXCHANGERS
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768566
Condensate Reuse for HVAC Efficiency Improvement
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760912
INTEGRATED HVAC SYSTEM WITH VARIABLE REFRIGERANT FLOW UNIT AND AIR HANDLING UNIT
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12749738
THERMAL MANAGEMENT CIRCUIT
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741512
HVAC DEHUMIDIFICATION SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+17.7%)
2y 7m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 888 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month