Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/763,396

Amplifier With Power Combination And Internal Redundancy And Modular Housing

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Priority
Apr 20, 2020 — DE 10 2020 110 652.1 +1 more
Examiner
RAHMAN, HAFIZUR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tesat-Spacecom GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
693 granted / 741 resolved
+33.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 741 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Goida et al. (US 8,779,535, hereinafter "Goida"). Regarding Claim 1, Goida discloses A high-frequency system, comprising an inner housing and an outer housing (Goida discloses a packaged integrated device system comprising an internal housing [internal lid 40] and an outer housing [external lid 42 and package substrate 12]. See Abstract, Fig. 2A, and Col. 6, lines 39–49); wherein the outer housing surrounds the inner housing so that a circumferential air gap runs in at least one plane between the inner housing and the outer housing (Goida discloses that an external cavity [15], which functions as an air cavity/gap, is formed between the external housing [3] and the internal housing [5], running continuously as an annular cavity surrounding the internal housing. See Fig. 1A, Fig. 2A, and Col. 3, lines 38–44); and the inner housing is spaced apart from the outer housing in the plane in which the air gap runs (Goida discloses that the internal housing [inner lid 40] is positioned inside the external housing [outer lid 42] and is physically separated/spaced apart from it by the intervening space of the external air cavity [15]. See Fig. 1A, Fig. 2A, and Col. 4, lines 45–49); wherein at least one electrical module configured to process high-frequency signals, is arranged in a cavity of the inner housing (Goida discloses internal cavities [13, 24] and an internal lid [40] housing components, but specifically shows an integrated circuit die [ASIC 21] mounted within the package housing and electrically connected via wire bonds [36, 38] to handle electronic signals, which inherently encompasses signal-processing modules mapping to this space. See Fig. 2A and Col. 8, line 54 to Col. 9, line 19); wherein a high-frequency connection is arranged on the outer housing; and (Goida discloses electrical connections on the outer housing, specifically external leads and traces located on the package substrate [12] which forms the bottom portion of the external housing structure to permit communication with external circuitry. See Fig. 2A and Col. 6, lines 51–56); wherein a signal to be transmitted via the high-frequency connection is transmitted via the air gap between the inner housing and the outer housing (Goida discloses that electrical signaling paths travel from the integrated dies via wire bonds [36, 38] which cross through the external cavity/air gap [15] spanning between the internal housing structure and the outer package substrate boundaries. See Fig. 2A and Col. 9, lines 8–19). Per claim 3, Goida explicitly discloses that The high-frequency system according to claim 1, further comprising a carrier unit, on which the outer housing and the inner housing are arranged (a carrier unit in the form of a package substrate [12], upon which both the outer housing [external package lid 42] and the inner housing [internal lid 40] are physically mounted and arranged. See Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B, Fig. 3, and Col. 6, lines 39–49) and wherein the outer housing and the inner housing are separated from one another by the air gap in the plane of the carrier unit (Goida explicitly illustrates that the lower mounting walls of the inner housing [internal lid 40] and the outer housing [external lid 42] terminate at laterally spaced locations along the top surface of the substrate [12]. They are physically separated from each other by the intervening space of the air cavity [15] right at the interface plane of the carrier unit. See Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B, and Fig. 3). Further per claim 5, Goida also teaches that the high-frequency system according to claim 1, wherein the electrical module in the inner housing is electrically connected to the inner housing by a wire bond (Goida explicitly teaches the implementation of wire bond connections for routing electrical paths to housing components. As illustrated in Figure 2A, the electrical module components [such as integrated circuit die 21] are electrically interconnected to the structural ground planes and adjacent housing components via wire bonds [36, 38]. See Fig. 2A and Col. 9, lines 1–19). Finally, per claim 6, Goida further teaches that an inner housing for a high-frequency system according to claim 1, wherein the inner housing has a cavity, in which an electrical component is arranged (Goida discloses an inner housing component [internal lid 40] defining an internal cavity [13, 24] that accommodates or directly overlies electrical components such as the MEMS die [19]. See Fig. 2A and Col. 7, lines 53–56); wherein the electrical component is electrically coupled to the inner housing (Goida discloses that the electrical component is physically and electrically coupled to the inner housing structure [internal lid 40] using a die adhesive [20] configured to electrically connect portions of the die to the housing structure for grounding. See Col. 8, line 54 to Col. 9, line 4); wherein the inner housing is configured to transmit high-frequency signals via an air gap to an outer housing, which surrounds the inner housing (Goida discloses that the inner housing structure interfaces with wire bonds [36, 38] that traverse across the air gap/external cavity [15] to route electrical signals to the surrounding outer housing boundaries. See Fig. 2A and Col. 9, lines 8–19); and wherein the inner housing is configured to be inserted into a high-frequency system in a modular manner (Goida discloses a modular method for packaging an integrated device where the internal housing component is provided as a pre-formed sub-assembly block that is positioned and mechanically coupled inside the external housing structure during mass assembly. See Fig. 4A [Blocks 52–58] and Col. 11, line 50 to Col. 12, line 11). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Goida. Regarding claim 2, Goida further teaches that the high-frequency system according to claim 1, wherein the inner housing has an end face with a toothed structure (Goida discloses an internal lid structure [40] providing an alternating, multi-tiered structural configuration along its mating interface boundaries. Specifically, Figure 3 discloses an inwardly bent first annular section [46] cooperating with an outwardly bent second annular section [47] to create a stepped or interlocking mating engagement interface. See Fig. 3 and Col. 10, lines 63–67.) Goida, however, is not explicit about the toothed structure of the end face is located opposite the high-frequency connection on the outer housing but Goida discloses that this alternating structural engagement zone [annular sections 46, 47] is positioned directly opposite the lower substrate boundary [12] containing the electrical connection pathways. See Fig. 3. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the current invention to modify Goida’s mating structure to use an interlocking or tiered geometric mating interface to align structural components or ports within an integrated device. Further per claim 4, Goida discloses that the high-frequency system according to claim 1, wherein the inner housing is coupled to the carrier unit (80) in a reversible manner (the inner housing [internal lid 40] is attached to the package substrate using an internal lid adhesive [43], which can specifically comprise solder or a reworkable conductive/nonconductive epoxy. See Col. 8, lines 4–7. In microelectronics packaging, attaching a component using reflowable solder or a thermal-release adhesive inherently provides a reversible/reworkable coupling configuration that can be decoupled via targeted heating. Adopting to this standard manufacturing technique for Goida would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the current invention as a well-known manufacturing practice. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAFIZUR RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-0659. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Han can be reached on (571) 272-2078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAFIZUR RAHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700837
RADIO FREQUENCY MODULE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693162
OFFSET VOLTAGE COMPENSATION CIRCUIT AND ISOLATION AMPLIFIER DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689334
POWER AMPLIFIER CIRCUIT
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689331
ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT LINEARIZATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683554
SUPPLY MODULATOR AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 741 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month