Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/763,444

CORDLESS ROLLER BLIND AND RESISTANCE MECHANISM THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, PHI DIEU
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
701 granted / 1070 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1112
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1070 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 8-10 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang (2017/0350188) in view of Campagna et al (2021/0262286). Huang figures 13-14, shows a resistance mechanism for a cordless roller blind, adapted to be installed between a winding shaft and a fixed seat of the cordless roller blind that are rotatable relative to each other, the resistance mechanism comprising: a housing(22) adapted to be co-rotatably mounted to the winding shaft, the housing including a tubular wall that is hollow and that surrounds an axis which extends in a left-right direction, and an end wall(figure 14 the wall at end of part 22 to the left of where 22 points to) that is connected to one end of the tubular wall, an inner circumferential surface of the tubular wall being provided with a teeth structure that surrounds the axis; and a resistance module(21) including a shaft(figure 13, the shaft at left end to part 21 to be inserted into 41) that extends along the axis through the end wall and that is surrounded by the tubular wall, and the shaft being adapted to be non-rotatably inserted into the fixed seat. Huang does not show and a plurality of gears(the flanges along the length of part 21) each of which is mounted to the shaft (figure 13, the shaft at left end to part 21 to be inserted into 41) and rotatable relative to the shaft about a rotation axis extending in the left-right direction, the gears being spaced apart from each other along a periphery of the shaft and meshing with the teeth structure, each of the gears being driven to rotate relative to the shaft by rotation of the teeth structure of the tubular wall when the tubular wall rotates. Campagna et al figure 9, shows a plurality of gears(665, 672) each of which is mounted to the shaft (677) and rotatable relative to the shaft about a rotation axis extending in the left-right direction, the gears being spaced apart from each other along a periphery of the shaft and meshing with the teeth structure(676) of a housing, each of the gears being driven to rotate relative to the shaft by rotation of the teeth structure of the tubular wall when the tubular wall rotates. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Huang’s structures to show a plurality of gears(665, 672) each of which is mounted to the shaft (677) and rotatable relative to the shaft about a rotation axis extending in the left-right direction, the gears being spaced apart from each other along a periphery of the shaft and meshing with the teeth structure(676) of a housing, each of the gears being driven to rotate relative to the shaft by rotation of the teeth structure of the tubular wall when the tubular wall rotates as taught by Campagna et al with a reasonable expectation of success in order to provide smooth rotation of the housing around the shaft as the multiple gears provide for smooth and controlled rotations due to the numerous amount of gear teeth to housing teeth. Per claim 2, Huang as modified further shows the shaft has a fixed section that extends along the axis through the end wall and that is adapted to be fixedly inserted into the fixed seat (41), and a mounting section that is coaxially connected to one end of the fixed section and that is located in the tubular wall(figure 13), the mounting section having a first mounting wall and a second mounting wall that are spaced apart from each other in the left-right direction, each of the gears being rotatably connected between the first mounting wall and the second mounting wall( as taught by Campagna figure 9 where gears 672, 665 are located). Per claim 3, Huang as modified further shows the mounting section of the shaft further has a plurality of accommodating grooves(Campagna figure 9, the grooves where gears ends fit therein) that are formed in an outer circumferential surface thereof and that are located between the first mounting wall and the second mounting wall, the gears being respectively accommodated in the accommodating grooves. Per claim 8, Huang as modified further shows an inner circumferential surface of the winding shaft(11) being formed with a first locking structure, wherein the tubular wall is coaxially inserted into the winding shaft, and an outer circumferential surface of the tubular wall is formed with a second locking structure(the ribs on part 22) that is adapted to be co-rotatably connected to the first locking structure. Per claim 9, Huang as modified further shows the first locking structure of the winding shaft having a plurality of locking grooves (figure 14, the grooves mating with the corresponding ribs of part 22) that are spaced apart from each other, that surrounds the axis, and that extend in the left-right direction, wherein the second locking structure of the tubular wall has a plurality of convex ribs(the ribs appear convex as it is narrower at top) that protrude radially about the axis and that respectively engage the locking grooves. Per claim 10, Huang(figures 1, 13) as modified further shows a cordless roller blind adapted to be mounted to a wall surface, the cordless roller blind comprising: a fixed seat and a hanging seat(40, 51) spaced apart from each other in a left-right direction and adapted to be mounted to the wall surface; a roller blind mechanism including a winding shaft(11) that extends in the left-right direction and that is disposed between the fixed seat and the hanging seat, a shade cloth(203) that is wound around the winding shaft, a winding unit( 53) that is disposed between the hanging seat and one end of the winding shaft, and a counterweight member(205) that is connected to one end of the shade cloth, the winding unit exerting a winding resilient force on the winding shaft to urge the winding shaft to rotate such that the shade cloth is wound on the winding shaft, the counterweight member having a weight that matches the winding resilient force; and the resistance mechanism as claimed in claim 1, the resistance mechanism being disposed between the fixed seat and another end of the winding shaft. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Per claims 4-6, prior art does not provide sufficient motivation to further modify Huang’s modified structure to show a plurality of first connecting grooves that are arranged along an outer periphery thereof, that are recessed inwardly from an outer circumferential surface thereof, and that extend therethrough in the left-right direction, a blocking section that has a diameter greater than a diameter of the first connecting section and that is limited at one side of the first mounting wall opposite to the gear section, the first mounting wall further having a plurality of position-limiting portions that extend into the first connecting grooves such that the first connecting section of each of the gears is limited in the respective one of the first connecting grooves and is separable from the respective one of the first connecting grooves in a radial direction of the mounting section of the shaft in combination with other claimed limitations. Per claim 7, prior art does not provide sufficient motivation to modify Huang’s modified structures to show the second mounting wall has a plurality of second connecting grooves that are spaced apart from each other along an outer periphery thereof, that are recessed inwardly from an outer circumferential surface thereof, and that extend therethrough in the left-right direction in combination with other claimed limitations. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art shows different cordless roller blind mounting mechanism. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHI D Tran whose telephone number is (571)272-6864. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN GLESSNER can be reached at 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHI D A/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601188
Support Plate for Installing Tile
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595665
DRY-LAID TILE STRUCTURE AND LAYING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584347
INSTALLATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12560022
CUSTOMIZABLE WINDOW AND DOOR SYSTEM FOR SEVERE WEATHER PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559946
DEVICES CONFIGURED TO OPERATE ON AN ANGLED SURFACE, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+22.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1070 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month