Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/763,662

SECURITY CONTAINER CASSETTE FOR BANKNOTES OR VALUABLES FOR ATMS OR CASH MACHINES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
TAWFIK, SAMEH
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
M I B S R L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 12m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
619 granted / 987 resolved
-7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 12m
Avg Prosecution
86 currently pending
Career history
1073
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 987 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions In response to the filed arguments by the applicant filed on 09/23/2025, the previously filed restriction requirements is withdrawn. All filed claims 1-10 have been rejoined and examined herewith below. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Italy on 07/03/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the foreign application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The following guidelines illustrate the preferred layout for the specification of a utility application. These guidelines are suggested for the applicant’s use. Arrangement of the Specification As provided in 37 CFR 1.77(b), the specification of a utility application should include the following sections in order. Each of the lettered items should appear in upper case, without underlining or bold type, as a section heading. If no text follows the section heading, the phrase “Not Applicable” should follow the section heading: (a) TITLE OF THE INVENTION. (b) CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS. (c) STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT. (d) THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES TO A JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT. (e) INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ON A READ-ONLY OPTICAL DISC, AS A TEXT FILE OR AN XML FILE VIA THE PATENT ELECTRONIC SYSTEM. (f) STATEMENT REGARDING PRIOR DISCLOSURES BY THE INVENTOR OR A JOINT INVENTOR. (g) BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION. (1) Field of the Invention. (2) Description of Related Art including information disclosed under 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. (h) BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION. (i) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S). (j) DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION. (k) CLAIM OR CLAIMS (commencing on a separate sheet). (l) ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE (commencing on a separate sheet). (m) SEQUENCE LISTING. (See MPEP § 2422.03 and 37 CFR 1.821 - 1.825). A “Sequence Listing” is required on paper if the application discloses a nucleotide or amino acid sequence as defined in 37 CFR 1.821(a) and if the required “Sequence Listing” is not submitted as an electronic document either on read-only optical disc or as a text file via the patent electronic system. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The filed specification is missing some headings, for example the BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION, BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION, DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION, etc. Appropriate correction is required. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because, it is referring to elements by numbers. The filed Abstract needs to eliminate the shown element numbers. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, and 4-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fumanelli (U.S. Pub. No. 2021/0002944). Fumanelli discloses a security container cassette for banknotes or valuables for Bancomat (i.e. cash machines) or ATMs, defining an internal volume and comprising perimeter walls including an upper wall, see for example (Figs. 1-3 & 7-8; via the security container cassette 1 for Cash machines, ATM, and the like 50): - said upper wall (Fig. 7; via 1b) developing along an upper surface (Fig. 7; via 11) and comprising: - a frame (Fig. 3; via the shown frame of container1) structurally in one piece with at least part of other said perimeter walls, - a main opening (via at 11) occupying most of said upper wall (1a), - a main container (via 2) arranged in said internal volume (1c) and in said main opening (11) and comprising: - an upper side (via 21) developing along said upper surface (1a) and covering said main opening (11) and at least part of said frame, said upper side being provided with passing through upper openings (Fig. 4; via openings 20a), - a lower side (Fig. 7; via 2a), arranged within said main volume and comprising passing through lower openings (Fig. 8; via shown openings at 2a), - side walls (Fig. 6; via 25) suitable for connecting said upper side (2b) and said lower side (2a), - constraint means suitable for rigidly constraining said upper side to said frame (paragraph 0060; “connection flanges 21, designed to firmly attach to the lid 10, by means of connection means such as screws or glues”). - an internal container (Fig. 7; via 22) inside said main container (2), which is fluid-tight and configured to hold marking fluid (intended use limitations of the internal container, not given much patentable weight; further paragraph 0032; “container 2 designed to contain making fluid”). Regarding claim 2: wherein said main container is made of metal (paragraph 0036; “In particular, it can be made of metal or polymer sheets”). Regarding claim 4: wherein said perimeter walls are made of polymeric material; (paragraph 0036; “In particular, it can be made of metal or polymer sheets”). Regarding claim 5: wherein said upper side is in one piece (Fig. 4; via 20). Regarding claim 6: wherein said lower side has a smaller main surface area than the area of said main opening so that it can pass through said main opening (Fig. 7; via 2a is smaller than 2b to pass through opening 11). Regarding claim 7: wherein said pass-through lower openings include sharp edges suitable for cutting said internal container in the event of impact, see for example (Fig. 8 & paragraph 0037; “The lower portion 2a may also comprise inward facing cutting elements for the second container 22”). Regarding claim 8: wherein said lower side is arranged above the area occupied by said banknotes or valuables, see for example (Figs. 3 & 7; via lower side of 2 arranged above area 1c of 10). Regarding claim 9: wherein said main opening (via 11) occupies at least 2/3 of said upper part (1b). Regarding claim 10: wherein said upper part (Fig. 7; via 20) is arranged along a lid (1b) of said cassette. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fumanelli (U.S. Pub. No. 2021/0002944). Regarding claim 3: Fumanelli may not suggest that the main container has walls less than 1 mm thick. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of applicant’s claimed invention, to have modified Fumanelli’s main container wall thickness to be less than 1 mm, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMEH TAWFIK whose telephone number is (571)272-4470. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shelle Self can be reached at 571-272-4524. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMEH TAWFIK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600106
CORNET CONE PACKAGE PRODUCTION MACHINE WITH VERTICAL FEEDING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594738
FORMING ASSEMBLY FOR A DUNNAGE CONVERSION MACHINE, DUNNAGE CONVERSION MACHINE AND PRE-PREPARED SHEET STOCK MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594352
PASTEURIZATION UNIT AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583199
MACHINE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING DUNNAGE HAVING AN X-SHAPED CROSS-SECTION PROFILE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570423
BAG MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+30.9%)
3y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 987 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month