Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/763,886

METHODS AND APPARATUS TO ADJUST LOAD TRANSIENT MARGINS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
LAXTON, GARY L
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
967 granted / 1118 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1141
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§102
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1118 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Objections Claims 8-12 and 14-17 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 8 recites the limitation "the control inputs" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Which ones? Does the applicant mean all of them, some of them or a few of them or just two of them or each of them? Claim 8 recites the limitation "the power outputs" in line 11. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Which ones? Does the applicant mean all of them, some of them or a few of them or just two of them or each of them? Claim 8 recites the limitation "the control outputs" in line 14. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Which ones? Does the applicant mean all of them, some of them or a few of them or just two of them or each of them? Claims 9-12 and 14-17 inherit the same from claim 8. Claim 11 recites the limitation "configurable to configurable to" [sic] in line 2. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 8 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dhuyvetter et al. (US 20110148386) in view of Imai et al. (US 20040189273 – previously cited). Claims 1 and 18; Dhuyvetter et al. disclose an apparatus (and method) comprising:; controller circuitry having a first input terminal (122/123), a second input terminal (e.g. feedback), and an output terminal ([0:N]), and the controller circuitry configurable to: receive, at the second input terminal, an indication of an output voltage (e.g. Vout); and responsive to a first comparison (118) between the output voltage and the first threshold voltage (122) and a second comparison (119) between the output voltage and the second threshold voltage (123), provide a switching signal at the output terminal ([0:N]). However, Dhuyvetter et al. do not disclose control circuitry having a terminal coupled to memory that is configurable to store a first value representative of a first threshold voltage and a second value representative of a second threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltages). Imai et al. teach a switching power supply having control circuitry (10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16) with an input terminal (at 15) coupled to memory (14) configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltages) in order to regulate the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify Dhuyvetter et al. to include control circuitry with a first input terminal coupled to memory configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage as taught by Imai et al. in order to provide a switching regulator that regulates the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Claim 8; Dhuyvetter et al. disclose a system comprising; multiple power stage circuitries (102, 104, 406, 408, 110) each having a control input (e.g. the gate) and a power output (at 114); a capacitor (126) coupled to the power outputs; and multiphase manager circuitry (120) having a first input terminal (Vrefs); a second input terminal ([0:1]) coupled to the capacitor (126) and control outputs ([0:N]) coupled to the control inputs (e.g. gates); the multiphase manager circuitry configurable to: receive, at the second input terminal, an indication of an output voltage across the capacitor (126) at the power outputs; and responsive to a first comparison (118) between the output voltage and the first threshold voltage and a second comparison (119) between the output voltage and the second threshold voltage, provide switching signals at the control outputs. However, Dhuyvetter et al. do not disclose control circuitry having a terminal coupled to memory that is configurable to store a first value representative of a first threshold voltage and a second value representative of a second threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltages). Imai et al. teach a switching power supply having control circuitry (10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16) with an input terminal (at 15) coupled to memory (14) configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltages) in order to regulate the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify Dhuyvetter et al. to include control circuitry with a first input terminal coupled to memory configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage as taught by Imai et al. in order to provide a switching regulator that regulates the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dhuyvetter et al. and Imai et al. in view of Qiu et al. (US 8080987) Dhuyvetter et al. and Imai et al. disclose the claimed subject matter in regards to claim 8 supra, except for the switching signals being PWM signals. Qiu et al. teach that it is old and well known to provide pulse width modulated signals for simple control of a switching regulator including a multiphase switching regulator to improve efficiency during variable load conditions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify Dhuyvetter et al. and Imai et al. to switching signals being PWM signals in order to provide pulse width modulated signals for simple control of a switching regulator including a multiphase switching regulator to improve efficiency during variable load conditions as taught by Qiu et al. Claim(s) 1, 2, 18 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hurcau et al. (US 20230185322) in view of Imai et al.. Claims 1 and 18; Hurcau disclose an apparatus, fig. 2, comprising: controller circuitry (138) having a first input terminal (Vref), a second input terminal (118), and an output terminal (140), and the controller circuitry configurable to: receive, at the second input terminal (118), an indication of an output voltage (feedback); and responsive to a first comparison (240) between the output voltage and the first threshold voltage (Vref2+) and a second comparison (242) between the output voltage and the second threshold voltage (Vref2-), provide a switching signal (246) at the output terminal (140). However, Hurcau et al. do not disclose control circuitry having a terminal coupled to memory that is configurable to store a first value representative of a first threshold voltage and a second value representative of a second threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltages). Imai et al. teach a switching power supply having control circuitry (10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16) with an input terminal (at 15) coupled to memory (14) configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltages) in order to regulate the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify Hurcau et al. to include control circuitry with a first input terminal coupled to memory configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage as taught by Imai et al. in order to provide a switching regulator that regulates the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Claims 2 and 20; para. [0020]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4-7 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 9-11 and 14-17 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the objection(s) set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20250062673 Deschenes discloses a power converter controlled by a processor that is coupled to a memory circuit by an input terminal. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY L LAXTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2079. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8 am-4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Crystal Hammond can be reached at 571-270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY L LAXTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838 10/05/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 03, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770776
POWER SUPPLY UNIT AND DC CONVERSION MODULE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763660
SWITCHING CONTROL CIRCUIT AND POWER SUPPLY CIRCUIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756320
VOLTAGE BALANCING IN HALF-BRIDGE VOLTAGE CONVERTER
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749982
TRAPEZOIDAL CURRENT CONTROL IN ELECTRONIC TRANSFORMERS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749974
DC-TO-DC CONVERTER AND CONFIGURABLE OUTPUT MAGNITUDE AND POLARITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.7%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1118 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month