Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/763,886

METHODS AND APPARATUS TO ADJUST LOAD TRANSIENT MARGINS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
LAXTON, GARY L
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
957 granted / 1107 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1127
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1107 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Inventorship This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/03/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, 2, 8, 12, 15, 18 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kasai et al. (US 20060198170) in view of Imai et al. (US 20040189273). Claims 1, 2, 18 and 20; Kasai et al. disclose an apparatus comprising: controller circuitry (e.g. R1/Rx, ERA, PWMD, PWMU) having: a second input terminal (FB); and an output terminal (DH1/DL1/DH2/DL2); the controller circuitry configured to: receive, at the second input terminal, an indication of an output voltage (VFB); and, adjusts an offset value (14) in response to a determination that the output voltage is outside the threshold voltage (para. [0078]) and provide, at the output terminal, an output signal based on the offset value. However, Kasai et al. do not disclose whether the control circuitry has a first input terminal coupled to memory configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltage). Imai et al. teach a switching power supply having control circuitry (10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16) with an input terminal (at 15) coupled to memory (14) configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltages) in order to regulate the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify Kasai et al. to include control circuitry with a first input terminal coupled to memory configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage as taught by Imai et al. in order to provide a switching regulator that regulates the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Claims 8 and 12; having: Kasai et al. disclose a system, comprising: power stage circuitry (FET1-FET4); multiphase manager circuitry controller circuitry (e.g. R1/Rx, ERA, PWMD, PWMU) having: a second input terminal coupled to a capacitor (C1 at FB); and an output terminal (DH1/DL1/DH2/DL2) coupled to the power stage circuitry (FET!-FET4); the controller circuitry configured to: receive, at the second input terminal, an indication of an output voltage (VFB); and, adjusts an offset value (14) in response to a determination that the output voltage is outside the threshold voltage (para. [0078]) and provide, at the output terminal, a pulse width modulation (PWM) signal to the power stage circuitry based on the offset value. However, Kasai et al. do not disclose whether the control circuitry has a first input terminal coupled to memory configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltage). Imai et al. teach a switching power supply having control circuitry (10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16) with an input terminal (at 15) coupled to memory (14) configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage (e.g. a reference voltages) in order to regulate the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify Kasai et al. to include control circuitry with a first input terminal coupled to memory configured to store a value representative of a threshold voltage as taught by Imai et al. in order to provide a switching regulator that regulates the output of switching power supplies to cause the output to reach the target value rapidly with suppressed overshoots and undershoots. Claim 15; the power stage circuitry is first power stage circuitry (FET1 & FET2); the output terminal is a first output terminal (DH1/DL1); the PWM signal is a first PWM signal (PWMD); the multiphase manager circuitry further includes a second output terminal coupled to second power stage circuitry (FET2 & FET3); and the multiphase manager circuitry is further configured to provide, at the second output terminal, a second PWM signal (DH2/DL2) to the second power stage circuitry based on the offset value. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3-7, 9-11, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 3-5; prior art fails to disclose or fairly suggest, inter alia, the threshold voltage is a first threshold voltage; the memory is further configured to store a second threshold voltage; and the controller circuitry is further configured to increase, in response to a determination the output voltage is below the second threshold voltage, the offset value. Claim 6; prior art fails to disclose or fairly suggest, inter alia, the controller circuitry is configured to: increment a counter value in response to the output voltage exceeding the threshold voltage; and modify the offset value in response to the counter value exceeding a threshold value. Claim 7; prior art fails to disclose or fairly suggest, inter alia, the output voltage is responsive to the output signal; and the controller circuitry is configured to provide the output signal such that the offset value is proportional to a target average magnitude of the output voltage. Claims 9-11; prior art fails to disclose or fairly suggest, inter alia, wherein the multiphase manager circuitry is configured to: determine an output current flowing to a load based on the output voltage; and perform Direct Current Load Line (DCLL) control operations to adjust a setpoint of the output voltage as a function of the output current, the DCLL control operations including providing the PWM signal to the power stage circuitry. Claim 13; prior art fails to disclose or fairly suggest, inter alia, the threshold voltage is a first threshold voltage; the memory is further configured to store a second threshold voltage; and the multiphase manager circuitry is further configured to increase, in response to a determination the output voltage is below the second threshold voltage, the offset value. Claim 14; prior art fails to disclose or fairly suggest, inter alia, the memory is further configured to store: a maximum voltage corresponding to a safety rating of the system, the first threshold voltage less than the maximum voltage; and a minimum voltage corresponding to the safety rating of the system, the second threshold voltage greater than the maximum voltage. Claim 16; prior art fails to disclose or fairly suggest, inter alia, the multiphase manager circuitry is configured to: increment a counter value in response to the output voltage exceeding the threshold voltage; and modify the offset value in response to the counter value exceeding a threshold value. Claim 17; prior art fails to disclose or fairly suggest, inter alia, the output voltage is responsive to the PWM signal; and the multiphase manager circuitry is configured to provide the PWM signal such that the offset value is proportional to a desired average magnitude of the output voltage. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20140132232 MacLean et al. disclose a DC converter with OFFSET adjustment; US 10778101 Schmitz discloses a switching regulator with memory circuit; US 5297014 Saito et al. disclose a switching power supply with offset means for offsetting a threshold value. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY L LAXTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2079. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8 am-4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Crystal Hammond can be reached at 571-270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY L LAXTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838 4/21/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683511
ELECTRIC DEVICE AND MOVING OBJECT
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683477
POWER CONTROLLER AND POWER MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR MULTI-POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671311
THREE-PHASE RESONANT CONVERTER AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671334
VOLTAGE CONVERSION DEVICE, POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, AND INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION METHOD
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671409
INTERLOCK DEVICE, ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND DEVICE THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.6%)
2y 2m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1107 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month