Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/763,907

ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
GODO, OLATUNJI A
Art Unit
1752
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
24M Technologies, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
950 granted / 1106 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1136
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1106 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 1. Claims 32-39 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. 2. Claim 32 recites the limitation "the second electrode" in line. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 3. Claims 33-39 are also indefinite based on their dependencies on claim 32. 4. For the purposes of prosecution, “the second electrode” has been interpreted as “the second electrode material”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for a patent. 5. Claims 32-52 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Seo et al., WO2012060604 published on 5/10/2012 (US20130236766 is the equivalent English translation used here) before 5/18/2012. 6. Regarding claims 32-52, Seo teaches an apparatus (see Figs. Below), comprising: a first insulative layer, a first conductive layer disposed on the first insulative layer, and a first electrode material disposed on at least a portion of the first conductive layer; a second insulative layer, a second conductive layer disposed on the second insulative layer, and a second electrode material disposed on at least a portion of the second conductive layer; and a separator interposed between the first electrode material and the second electrode material, the separator coupled to at least a portion of the first insulative layer and the second insulative material to form a seal around the first electrode material and the second electrode material such that the first electrode material is electrically isolated from the second electrode, a portion of the first conductive layer extends beyond each of the first and second insulative layer to form a first tab (see Figs. Below), PNG media_image1.png 718 904 media_image1.png Greyscale 7. Drawings and pictures can anticipate claims if they clearly show the structure which is claimed. In re Mraz, 455 F.2d 1069, 173 USPQ 25 (CCPA 1972). However, the picture must show all the claimed structural features and how they are put together. Jockmus v. Leviton, 28 F.2d 812 (2d Cir. 1928). The origin of the drawing is immaterial. For instance, drawings in a design patent can anticipate or make obvious the claimed invention as can drawings in utility patents. When the reference is a utility patent, it does not matter that the feature shown is unintended or unexplained in the specification. The drawings must be evaluated for what they reasonably disclose and suggest to one of ordinary skill in the art. In re Aslanian, 590 F.2d 911, 200 USPQ 500 (CCPA 1979). (MPEP 2125). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLATUNJI GODO whose telephone number is (571)272-3104. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Smith can be reached on 571-272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLATUNJI A GODO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603346
THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603318
DISTRIBUTED LARGE-SCALE SYSTEM OF ALL-VANADIUM REDOX FLOW BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597591
ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERIES, AND SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597623
GENERATING POWER FROM RECYCLED HYDROCARBON GAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597616
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING HYDROGEN STACK CURRENT AND LOAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1106 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month