Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/763,982

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTIVARIATE TESTING OF MESSAGES TO SUBGROUP IN A ONE-TO-MANY MESSAGING PLATFORM

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, ANH
Art Unit
2458
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Community Com Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
282 granted / 359 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
382
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 359 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This communication is in response to the application file on 7/3/24. Claim 1 is rejected. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1, 9, and 17 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11641333. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Present Application Patent No. 11641333 Claim 8 determining one or more attributes of a plurality of users of a messaging platform, said determining comprising identifying, based on a use of one or more messaging services associated with the messaging platform, a behavior associated with the plurality of users; identifying, based on the one or more attributes, a first subset of the plurality of users and a second subset of the plurality of users; associating a first message with the first subset of the plurality of users; transmitting, via the one or more messaging services, the first message to each user of the first subset of the plurality of users; determining a performance metric of the first message among the first subset of the plurality of users; generating, based on the first message and the performance metric, a second message; and transmitting, via the one or more messaging services, the second message to each user of the second subset of the plurality of users, wherein: the second subset of the plurality of users comprises a first user and the first subset of the plurality of users does not comprise the first user, and said transmitting the second message is associated with a durable long-code telephone number. Claims 1, 9, and 17 determining one or more attributes of a plurality of users of a messaging platform, said determining comprising identifying, based on a use of one or more messaging services associated with the messaging platform, a behavior associated with the plurality of users; identifying, based on the one or more attributes, a first subset of the plurality of users and a second subset of the plurality of users; associating a first message with the first subset of the plurality of users; transmitting, via the one or more messaging services, the first message to each user of the first subset of the plurality of users; determining a performance metric of the first message among the first subset of the plurality of users; generating, based on the first message and the performance metric, a second message; and transmitting, via the one or more messaging services, the second message to each user of the second subset of the plurality of users, wherein: the second subset of the plurality of users comprises a first user and the first subset of the plurality of users does not comprise the first user, and said transmitting the second message is associated with a durable long-code telephone number. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-0657. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Trost can be reached at 5712727872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANH NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2442
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602480
DATA MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND DATA MANAGEMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603908
SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ANOMALOUS NETWORK PATTERNS BASED ON ANALYZING NETWORK TRAFFIC DATA AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587558
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ASSISTED CYBER THREAT IDENTIFICATION VIA WEBSERVER LOGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578895
USING NETWORK DEVICE REPLICATION IN DISTRIBUTED STORAGE CLUSTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581310
PAIRING OF USER DEVICE WITH REMOTE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month