Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/764,016

FLIP-TYPE PHOTO FRAME

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Priority
Mar 21, 2024 — CN 202410325644.1
Examiner
DAVIS, CASSANDRA HOPE
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Zhejiang Lifeshine Arts Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
796 granted / 1341 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1379
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1341 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 4, 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, line 41, the phrase “the positioning sticking portion” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 6, line 2, it is unclear if the positioning sticking portion is the same as claim 1, line 41. Regarding claim 7, line 3, the phrase “the turning track” lacks antecedent basis. It is unclear if the turning track is the same as the “turning connection” recited in claim 1, line 29. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: it appears as if the numeral “4” should be deleted. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 4, 6-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Regarding claim 1, Li teaches a photo frame, comprising: a frame body (1), wherein an insert cavity (sliding groove 10) for arranging a photo (picture, not labeled) is arranged in the frame body (1), and the insert cavity (10) is provided with a mounting opening for allowing the photo to enter the insert cavity; an opening-and-closing flip cover (movable cover 7), wherein the opening-and-closing flip cover (7) is turnably arranged on the frame body (1) and forms a closing position (figures 1 and 6) and an opening position (figure 4) on a turning track thereof, so that the mounting opening is in a closed state or an opened state; and an elastic positioning part (spring 8), wherein the elastic positioning part (8) acts between the opening-and-closing flip cover (7) and the frame body (fixing frame 6 of body 1). Li does not teach when the opening-and-closing flip cover is located at the closing position, the elastic positioning part abuts against the opening-and-closing flip cover to keep the opening-and-closing flip cover in the closed state, and when the opening-and-closing flip cover is located at the opening position, the elastic positioning part abuts against the opening-and-closing flip cover to keep the opening-and-closing flip cover in the open state. In addition, Li does not teach a side that is of the first limiting portion and that is away from the second limiting portion is provided with a mounting guide slope, when the opening-and-closing flip cover and the frame body are in a separated state, the first mounting portion and the second mounting portion of the opening-and-closing flip cover located at the closing position are close to each other, at least one of the first mounting portion, the second mounting portion and the opening-and-closing flip cover is deformed by the mounting guide slope, so that the limiting strip gets across the first limiting portion to enter the first fastening cavity, and a positioning sticking portion goes backwards from the opening positioning portion to the closing positioning portion, and then under the action of the deformed first mounting portion, the second mounting portion and the opening-and-closing flip cover and the effect of the restoration of the closing positioning portion, the limiting strip is inserted into the first fastening cavity to complete mounting. Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record does not teach or suggest a picture frame in combination with the other limitations of the claim comprising an opening and closing flip cover located at the closing position, the elastic positioning part abuts against the opening-and-closing flip cover to keep the opening-and-closing flip cover in the closed state, and when the opening-and-closing flip cover is located at the opening position, the elastic positioning part abuts against the opening-and-closing flip cover to keep the opening-and-closing flip cover in the open state. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CASSANDRA DAVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-6642. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 AM-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached at 571-272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CASSANDRA DAVIS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676085
Elastomeric Card Case Holder Device and Method
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12658078
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648545
ANIMAL EAR TAG
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646426
ELECTRONIC ROTATING RIDER APPARATUS AND SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640063
Display device
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+25.9%)
2y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1341 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month