Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/764,282

Over Door Writing Surface System and Method of Use

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 04, 2024
Examiner
BLAISE, MALINA D
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
364 granted / 635 resolved
-12.7% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+39.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 635 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over NPL Vivo Hanging Whiteboard Instruction Manual, https://vivo-us.co/products/hanging-24-x-20-whiteboard, (hereinafter “Vivo”). Concerning claim 1, Vivo discloses an over door writing surface system, comprising (page 2, Hanging Whiteboard); at least one hanger slidingly attached to the upper frame of a writing surface (page 3, step 3- whiteboard is slidingly attached to upper frame); the hanger includes a body with a door channel and a frame channel integral thereto and fixedly attached along a shared exterior edge (page 3, steps 2 and 3- hanger has body with door channel and a frame channel attached on edge); the door channel includes a u-shape that forms an interstitial space therein; the frame channel includes three solid walls and an access wall that is joined at two ends to the adjacent opposing side walls, the access wall has an opening therein that passes therethrough to a hollow space that is bounded within the three solid walls and the access wall (page 3, steps 2 and 3 - door channel (element B) is u-shaped, the frame has 3 solid walls and access wall); wherein the upper frame of a writing surface slides into the hollow space of the frame channel of the hanger (page 3, steps 2 and 3 – upper frame slides into frame channel); and wherein the upper edge of a door enters the door channel of the hanger and thereby suspends the writing surface on the door (page 3, step 3 – upper edge enters door channel and suspends writing surface on door). Concerning claim 2, Vivo discloses a method of attaching a writing surface to a door (page 2, Hanging Whiteboard), comprising: selecting at least one hanger to support a writing surface (page 3, step 3- whiteboard is slidingly attached to upper frame); pressing the frame channel of the hanger on the upper frame of the writing surface (page 3, steps 2 and 3- frame channel is pressed onto upper frame of writing surface); placing the hanger over the upper edge of a door so that the upper edge rests within the door channel of the hanger (page 3, step 3 – upper edge enters door channel and suspends writing surface on door); and allowing the writing surface to rest against the adjacent surface of the door (page 3, step 3 – upper edge enters door channel and suspends writing surface on door). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is listed in the PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALINA D BLAISE whose telephone number is (571)270-3398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Thurs. 7:00 am - 5:00 pm (PT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MALINA D. BLAISE Primary Examiner Art Unit 3715 /MALINA D. BLAISE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 04, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582920
TOY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573269
INFORMATION PROCESSOR AND GAME CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558613
Control Method and Electronic Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551792
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GAMIFICATION IN A METAVERSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544665
COMPUTER SYSTEM, GAME SYSTEM, AND REPLACEMENT PLAY EXECUTION CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+39.6%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 635 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month