Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/764,336

METHOD AND INTERNET OF THINGS SYSTEM FOR SAFETY SUPERVISION OF SMART GAS OPERATION QUALITY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 04, 2024
Priority
May 23, 2024 — CN 202410645555.5
Examiner
CONNOLLY, MARK A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Chengdu Qinchuan IOT Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
688 granted / 839 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
864
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
67.6%
+27.6% vs TC avg
§102
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 839 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 have been presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, claims 1 and 11 recite the limitation “update the preset frequency” on lines 14 and 18 respectively and then later refer to "an updated preset frequency” on lines 19 and 23 respectively. It is unclear if these updated preset frequencies are the same or different. For examination purposes, lines 19 and 23 of claims 1 and 11 respectively are interpreted as “the updated preset frequency”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. REASONS FOR ALLOWANCE The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: PGPUB 2021/0215568 to Hori teaches both increasing a processing frequency for a sensor when water leakage is detected and also attempts to determine the location of the leak [Figs. 7-8, 0114-0122, 0173-0174]. US Pat No 8502687 to Wang teaches using sensors to receive pipeline data, such as pressure data, and if the data is abnormal, using the pipeline data to identify a leak section [cols. 3-4 lines 40-3]. US Pat No 6976382 to Kadowaki teaches increasing a frequency of abnormality diagnosis of a gas sensor [cols. 14-15 lines 64-11]. US Pat No 5686828 to Peterman teaches determining the locations of fractures within a gas pipeline using a plurality of sensors [abstract, cols. 3-4 lines 63-14]. US Pat No 4866633 to Nakane teaches detecting an abnormality when a gas flow rate exceeds a normal rate and closing a shutoff valve in response [col. 1 lines 45-66]. US Pat No 4799166 to Shiono teaches analyzing gas to determine the presence or absence of an abnormality and adjusting a sampling rate according to the analyzed results [claim 1]. The prior art of record does not teach or suggest either individually or in combination, determining at least one suspect pipeline network segment from an abnormal second distributed gas data that is collected at an updated frequency when a first distributed gas data is abnormal. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK A CONNOLLY whose telephone number is (571)272-3666. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kamini Shah can be reached at 571-272-2279. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK A CONNOLLY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2115 5/29/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667058
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING HORTICULTURAL LOAD SHEDDING
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663173
Diagnostics of HVAC system based on visual and sound signatures
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652505
DETERMINATION OF SEAL QUALITY
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12642052
ETCHING CONTROL METHOD AND ETCHING CONTROL SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632035
GENERIC PID DESIGN AND TUNING
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 8m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 839 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month