Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 18/764,439

TONER PRODUCING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 05, 2024
Priority
Jul 10, 2023 — JP 2023-112858
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
52%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
29 granted / 42 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -17% lift
Without
With
+-17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
82
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
62.1%
+22.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 42 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. JP2023-112858, filed on 7/10/2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yojiro (JP 2011-028049) in view of Kubota (US PGP 2020-0254468) and considered with Kuroda (US PGP 2002-0048712). Yojiro teaches a method for producing toner comprising melt-kneading a mixture containing at least a binder resin and a colorant (material to be dispersed) (Abstract). The material to be dispersed may also include a release agent ([0024]). Water is also added to the mixture ([0025]). The exemplary toners contain 5 wt% water, or approximately 5 parts to 100 parts of the binder resin mixture, in the mixture to be melt-kneaded ([0086], Table 3-2). After melt-kneading the toner is pulverized ([0028]). The exemplary toners comprise two melt-kneading steps, wherein the first melt-kneading step includes part of the binder resin and part of the pigment to yield a first kneaded product, and a second melt-kneading step comprising the first kneaded product and the rest of the binder resin ([0086-87]). The second mixture also comprises 5 wt% water ([0087] line 1-2). Yojiro is silent regarding the water in the mixture comprising ultrafine bubbles. Kubota teaches a liquid containing ultrafine bubbles with a diameter of less than 1.0 µm, or 1,000 nm (Abstract). The liquid may be pure water ([0065], [0085]). The number density of the ultrafine bubbles is 1.0 billion per milliliter, and 99% of the ultrafine bubbles have a diameter of 10 nm to 400 nm ([0098]). The ultrafine bubbles exist in the water stably ([0088-97], [0099]). Kuroda teaches a method for manufacturing toner that includes melt-kneading a binder resin with a pigment and water (Abstract). As the mixture is heated, the water reaches its boiling point, and the forces exerted from the boiling of the water causes pulverization of the pigment ([0042]). As the temperature for the melt-kneading in the examples of Yojiro is below the boiling point of water ([0086]), this method would not benefit from the forces incurred from the boiling of the water. Modifying the water of Yojiro to be the water containing ultrafine bubbles of Kubota could result in a similar pigment pulverization effect as described by Kuroda. The action of kneading the mixture of binder resin and material to be dispersed would cause the ultrafine bubbles in the water to pop. The resulting force of the popping bubbles would help to pulverize and disperse the pigment similar to boiling, but without needing the mixture to be at a temperature hot enough for the water to boil. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the method of Yojiro to have included the water containing ultrafine bubbles of Kubota in order to more evenly disperse the pigment in the resulting toner. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 09/30/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748357
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12704795
FINE PARTICLE CONTAINING SILICON AND TONER
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681403
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675060
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669760
SILICA PARTICLE, TONER FOR DEVELOPING ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
52%
With Interview (-17.2%)
3y 4m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 42 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month