Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/764,739

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REMOVING EXCESS TRANSTHYRETIN PROTEIN FROM BLOODSTREAM TO TREAT ATTR AMYLOIDOSIS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 05, 2024
Priority
Jul 05, 2023 — provisional 63/525,034
Examiner
DEAK, LESLIE R
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
710 granted / 943 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
982
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
72.3%
+32.3% vs TC avg
§102
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 943 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2017/0072128 to Frodsham. In the specification and figures, Frodsham discloses the apparatus substantially as claimed by Applicant. With regard to claims 1, 4, Frodsham discloses an apparatus and method for removing undesirable products from blood through magnetic separation (see ¶0004). The apparatus comprises a blood dialysis circuit with an input port 14 and output port 18, pump 22 for pumping blood through the circuit, a magnetic separation filter 34 that is capable of removing an protein bound to magnetic nanoparticles, a pressure gauge 48, as well as a gas trap (see ¶0044-0045). With regard to claim 2, Frodsham discloses that the separation filter comprises a magnetic pad 120 and an enclosure 82 with ports 26, 38, at opposite ends (see FIGS 3a, 7 see ¶0049, 0053, 0057-0058). With regard to claim 3, Frodsham discloses that the magnet may comprise a collection of smaller magnets 120 on a steel back plate 134 that is attached to aluminum frame pieces 142, 146, teaching a non-magnetic tray for supporting the magnetic pad (see FIG 11 and ¶0066). Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2017/0072128 to Frodsham in view of WO 2021/222991 to Moroz. In the specification and figured, Frodsham discloses the method substantially as claimed by Applicant. With regard to claim 5, Frodsham discloses the steps of directing the patient’s arterial blood through a dialysis circuit with a pump and a catheter, separating proteins bound to a ferromagnetic material, and returning the treated blood, minus the targeted molecules, to the patient (see ¶0069-0070). Frodsham does not disclose that the magnetic nanoparticles are bound to transthyretin amyloid proteins. However, Moroz discloses an extracorporeal blood circuit comprising a hemodialysis unit 4, treatment zone 5, and that returns blood to the patient (see FIG 1, ¶0062, 0063). The treatment zone comprises a complexing agent (ultra-large cage structure protein, or ULCS) that may bind to a targeted molecule M for which the ULCS has been designed. Blood flows through the treatment zone, the ULCS binds to the target molecule, the treated blood is directed to the dialyzer 4, and the target molecule is removed with magnetic force in the dialyzer (see ¶0013, 0064, claim 4). Moroz specifically teaches that the ULCS may be used to target transthyretin (see ¶0006). Taken together, the references suggest a method of removing a target molecule, transthyretin, via selective binding and magnetic removal. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 2022/0378823 Chen et al Creating an antibody-antigen complex and removing targeted complex from blood. US 9,220,831 Ingber et al Magnetic separation system US 2014/0008210 Guia et al Magnetic separation system Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LESLIE R DEAK whose telephone number is (571)272-4943. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sarah Al-Hashimi can be reached at 571-272-7159. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LESLIE R DEAK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799 28 May 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678550
NEW STANDARDIZATIONS & MEDICAL DEVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLATELET RICH PLASMA (PRP) OR BONE MARROW CONCENTRATE (BMC) ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH HYALURONIC ACID
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678328
INTRAOCULAR SHUNTS WITH LOW-PROFILE ACTUATION ELEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667488
SHUNTING SYSTEMS WITH ROTATION-BASED FLOW CONTROL ASSEMBLIES, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661263
EYE SHUNT SYSTEM AND METHODS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661264
STENT IMPLANT FOR TREATING GLAUCOMA BY MEANS OF INTRAOCULAR FLUID DRAINAGE FROM THE ANTERIOR CHAMBER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+17.6%)
3y 3m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 943 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month