Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/764,959

ENHANCED COLOR GAMUT FOR ELECTRONIC DISPLAYS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 05, 2024
Priority
Jul 07, 2023 — provisional 63/512,516
Examiner
FAROKHROOZ, FATIMA N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Daktronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
424 granted / 864 resolved
-10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
906
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
73.4%
+33.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 864 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Byun (US 20120147065 A1, cited by Applicant) Regarding claim 1, Byun teaches an electronic display ([0003]) comprising: an array of pixels of light-emitting elements (Fig.3,4 and 11; [0043]-[0048]), wherein each pixel comprises a first primary light-emitting element configured to emit a first primary color (items UP and R in Fig.3,4 and [0043]-[0048]) located at a first physical primary color point on a color space chromaticity diagram, a second primary light-emitting element (items UP and G in Fig.3,4 and [0043]-[0048]) configured to emit a second primary color located at a second physical primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram, a third primary light-emitting element (items UP and B1 in Fig.3,4 and [0043]-[0048]) configured to emit a third primary color located at a third physical primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram, and one or more derivative light-emitting elements (items UP and B2 in Fig.3,4 and [0043]-[0048]) each configured to emit a derivative color each located at a derivative color point on the color space chromaticity diagram; wherein the first physical primary color point, the second physical primary color point, the third physical primary color point, and each derivative color point are located on a boundary of a virtual color space on the color space chromaticity diagram, wherein the boundary of the virtual color space comprises a first apex at a first virtual primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram (Fig.11,[0059],[0063] element R,G,B1,B2), a second apex at a second virtual primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram, and a third apex at a third virtual primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram, wherein at least one of the first virtual primary color point, the second virtual primary color point, and the third virtual primary color point is different from the first physical primary color point, from the second physical primary color point, and from the third physical primary color point, respectively; wherein a color gamut that can be produced by the array of pixels is greater than a corresponding gamut for corresponding pixels of corresponding light-emitting elements that are configured to only emit the first primary color, the second primary color, and the third primary color (Fig.11,[0059],[0063] element R,G,B1,B2). Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Carlson (US 20210143135 A1, cited previously) Regarding claim 1, Carlson teaches an electronic display comprising: an array of pixels of light-emitting elements (Abstract, at least Fig.1-4), wherein each pixel comprises: a first primary light-emitting element (red) configured to emit a first primary color located at a first physical primary color point on a color space chromaticity diagram, a second primary light-emitting element (green) configured to emit a second primary color located at a second physical primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram, a third primary light-emitting element (blue) configured to emit a third primary color located at a third physical primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram, and one or more derivative light-emitting elements (see the additional lighting elements, other than red, green and blue in Fig.5A-5D) each configured to emit a derivative color each located at a derivative color point on the color space chromaticity diagram; wherein the first physical primary color point, the second physical primary color point, the third physical primary color point, and each derivative color point are located on a boundary of a virtual space on the color space chromaticity diagram, wherein the boundary of the virtual color space comprises a first apex at a first virtual primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram, a second apex at a second virtual primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram, and a third apex at a third virtual primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram (Fig.4;[0030;[0059],[0063], the bold lines in Fig.4 with boundary line 42 correspond to the primary colors and the dashed lines 44 are formed by the additional colors towards achieving enhanced gamut display), wherein at least one of the first virtual primary color point, the second virtual primary color point, and the third virtual primary color point is different from the first physical primary color point, from the second physical primary color point, and from the third physical primary color point, respectively (the dashed lines formed by 44 in Fig.4 that are different from lines formed by 42; [0030]). wherein a color gamut that can be produced by the array of pixels is greater than a corresponding gamut for corresponding pixels of corresponding light-emitting elements that are configured to only emit the first primary color, the second primary color, and the third primary color ([0005]: The present disclosure describes an electronic display with a color gamut that is enhanced compared to the gamut available from conventional RGB displays;[0032]-[0035]). Regarding claim 2, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein each derivative color point is proximate to one of the first physical primary color point, the second physical primary color point, and the third physical primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram ([0030] and comparing 42 and 44 in Fig.4). Regarding claim 3, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the boundary of the virtual color space comprises a first virtual boundary line extending from the first virtual primary color point at the first apex to the second virtual primary color point at the second apex, a second virtual boundary line extending from the second virtual primary color point at the second apex to the third virtual primary color point at the third apex, and a third virtual boundary line extending from the third virtual primary color point at the third apex to the first virtual primary color point at the first apex (44 in Fig.4 and [0030]). Regarding claim 4, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the boundary of the virtual color space is triangular (44 in Fig.4). Regarding claim 5, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the boundary of the virtual color space consists of the first apex at the first virtual primary color point, the second apex at the second virtual primary color point, the third apex at the third virtual primary color point, the first virtual boundary line, the second virtual boundary line, and the third virtual boundary line (44 in Fig.4). Regarding claim 6, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the one or more derivative light-emitting elements comprises a first derivative light-emitting element configured to emit a first derivative color located at a first derivative color point on the color space chromaticity diagram (points on 44 in Fig.4). Regarding claim 7, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the first derivative color point is located proximate to the first physical primary color point on the color space chromaticity diagram (since lines 44, 42, 40 are adjacent in Fig.4). Regarding claim 8, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the first virtual primary color point is spaced from the first physical primary color point and the first derivative color point, the second virtual primary color point is located at the second physical primary color point, and the third virtual primary color point is located at the third physical primary color point (co-incident points in Fig.4 for 42 and 44). Regarding claim 9, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the one or more derivative light-emitting elements consists of the first derivative light-emitting element configured to emit the first derivative color located at the first derivative color point (all of Fig.5, and lighting elements other than primary RGB). Regarding claim 10, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the one or more derivative light-emitting elements further comprises a second derivative light-emitting element configured to emit a second derivative color located at a second derivative color point on the color space chromaticity diagram (all of Figures 5, wherein additional lighting elements other than the primary RGB; multiple-additional-gamut enhancing LEDs in Figures 5, that reflect on the chromaticity diagram). Regarding claim 11, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the second derivative color point is located proximate to the second physical primary color point (since lines 44, 42, 40 are adjacent in Fig.4). Regarding claim 12, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the first virtual primary color point is spaced from the first physical primary color point and the first derivative color point, the second virtual primary color point is spaced from the second physical primary color point and the second derivative color point, and the third virtual primary color point is located at the third physical primary color point (all of Figures 5, wherein additional lighting elements other than the primary RGB; multiple-additional-gamut-enhancing-LEDs in Figures 5, that reflect on the chromaticity diagram). Regarding claim 13, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the one or more derivative light-emitting elements consists of the first derivative light-emitting element configured to emit the first derivative color located at the first derivative color point and the second derivative light-emitting element configured to emit the second derivative color located at the second derivative color point (all of Figures 5, wherein additional lighting elements other than the primary RGB; multiple-additional-gamut-enhancing-LEDs in Figures 5, that reflect on the chromaticity diagram). Regarding claim 14, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the one or more derivative light-emitting elements further comprises a third derivative light-emitting element configured to emit a third derivative color located at a third derivative color point on the color space chromaticity diagram (all of Figures 5, wherein additional lighting elements other than the primary RGB; multiple-additional-gamut-enhancing-LEDs in Figures 5, that reflect on the chromaticity diagram). Regarding claim 15, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the first derivative color point is located proximate to the first physical primary color point, the second derivative color point is located proximate to the second physical primary color point, and the third derivative color point is located proximate to the third physical primary color point (from Fig.4). Regarding claim 16, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the first virtual primary color point is spaced from the first physical primary color point and the first derivative color point, the second virtual primary color point is spaced from the second physical primary color point and the second derivative color point, and the third virtual primary color point is spaced from the third physical primary color point and the third derivative color point (from Fig.4). Regarding claim 17, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the first physical primary color point and the second derivative color point are located on the first virtual boundary line, the second physical primary color point and the third derivative color point are located on the second virtual boundary line, and the third physical primary color point and the first derivative color point are located on the third virtual boundary line (44 in Fig.4 and [0030], in view of the broad meaning and scope of the terms “virtual boundary line, extending three of the up to six (or nine) lines connecting the points of the red, green, blue LEDs in the color space and the up to three (or six) LEDs with a different shade of red, green or blue in the color space inevitably results in a triangular shape in the color space) . Regarding claim 18, Carlson teaches an electronic display, wherein the one or more derivative light-emitting elements consists of the first derivative light-emitting element configured to emit the first derivative color located at the first derivative color point, the second derivative light-emitting element configured to emit the second derivative color located at the second derivative color point, and the third derivative light-emitting element configured to emit the third derivative color located at the third derivative color point (from Fig.4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Carlson in view of Byun (US 20120147065 A1, cited by Applicant) Regarding claim 19, Carlson teaches the invention set forth in claim 1 above, but is silent regarding a computer processor configured to convert a color value defined based the first virtual primary color point, the second virtual primary color point, and the third virtual primary color point to corresponding outputs for the first primary light-emitting element, the second primary light-emitting element, the third primary light-emitting element, and each of the one or more derivative light-emitting elements. Byun teaches in [0057], [0061]- [0062] and Fig.11: The data converter 200 performs color coordinate conversion based on the gamma-corrected blue data Bg to generate three-color conversion data and a color gamut determination signal, and inversely gamma-corrects the three-color conversion data. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date, to use the processor as disclosed in Byun, in the device of Carlson, in order to generate the desired range of colors ([0063]). Regarding claim 20, Carlson in view of Byun teaches the electronic display of claim 1, wherein the color space chromaticity diagram is an XYZ chromaticity diagram adopted by International Commission on Illumination in 1931 ([0027] in Byun). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Fatima Farokhrooz whose telephone number is (571)-272-6043. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday- Friday, 9 am - 5 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s Supervisor, James Greece can be reached on (571) 272-3711. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Fatima N Farokhrooz/ Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740250
DISPLAY PANEL
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733258
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729835
Lighting Apparatus and Lighting System
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727332
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727368
DISPLAY PANEL, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+32.6%)
2y 11m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 864 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month