Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/765,031

ULTRA-HIGH RELIABILITY (UHR) SIGNALING DESIGN

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 05, 2024
Examiner
CHASE, SHELLY A
Art Unit
2112
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
715 granted / 755 resolved
+39.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
772
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 755 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1 to 30 are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The references listed in the information disclosure statement submitted on 11-4-2025, 1-15-2026 and 2-3-2026 have been considered by the examiner (see attached PTO-1449). Election/Restrictions Claims 13 to 17 and 25 to 30 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12-22-2025. Claim Objections Claims 1, 7, 18 and 22 to 24 are objected to because of the following informalities: please change “user info” recited on line 5, with ‘user information’. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 to 2, 7, 18 to 19 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Song et al. (USPAP 2024/0283561). Claims 1 and 18: Song substantially teaches the claimed invention. Song teaches a method and devices for a wireless communication for WiFi that includes signaling for multiple modulation and coding schemes for a single user, the device comprising: one or more access point (AP) (102) (“first wireless communication) communicating frames (140) to one or more user devices (120) (“second wireless communication device”) in accordance with IEEE 802.11 communication standards (see fig. 1 and par. 0039). Song teaches that the user devices and the AP may include one or more computer systems and includes any suitable processor driven device (see par. 0041). Song teaches that the frames communicated, supports an extremely high throughput (EHT) signal field (EHT-SIG) content channel comprising a common filed (204) and a user specific field (206) (see par. 0051). The user specific field may include 22 bits of a user subfield, with a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) field, a tail and padding fields (see par. 0051). Song teaches that the user specific field includes a modulation and coding (MCS) field of 4 bits (see par. 0052). Song teaches that an Ultra High Reliability (UHR-SIG) uses additional bits for (MCS) such as 6 bits for unequal modulation and the newly added (MCS’s) (see par. 0054). Song teaches that MCS for unequal modulation with unequal patterns and newly added MCS’s may support a number of spatial streams (NSS) subfield wherein 2 spatial streams, 3 spatial streams and 4 spatial streams are (see par. 0054). Song teaches that a user can obtain the number of spatial streams through the NSS subfield and then obtain its equal MCS assignment or unequal modulation/QAM assignment by checking the MCS subfield table corresponding to the obtained NSS (see par. 0055). Song also teaches that new MCS in single user transmission enables low complexity and overhead. Song teaches applying unequal modulation to a single user (SU) transmission over full bandwidth (see par. 0030). Song teaches that MCS subfield in UHR-SIG needs to be defined to support bit unequal modulation and newly added MCS, wherein the newly added MCSs can have 2 spatial streams, 3 spatial streams or 4 spatial streams. Song teaches that two additional bits in the MCS subfield of UHR-SIG comes from one reserve bit and the 1-bit coding subfield in the user field of the UHR-SIG. Song teaches that in a first option, the coding subfield of 1 bit is utilized to indicate low density parity check (LDPC) or binary convolutional code (BCC) coding (see par. 0060). Song teaches that a functional diagram of a communication station (700) that may be suitable for use as AP or user devices, comprising a memory (708) storing configuration information for the processor to perform the various operations (see par. 0077). However, Song fails to specifically teach the claimed limitation of: “the subfield comprising at least two bits supporting at least three coding scheme options;” however, this limitation is obvious to the teachings of Song since, Song teaches that features of some embodiments may be substituted for those of other embodiments. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the subfield of Song to include the claimed limitation of “the subfield comprising at least two bits supporting at least three coding scheme options” because Song teaches that changes can be made to the structural, logical, electrical, process or algorithm of an embodiment. This modification would have been obvious because a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to change the subfield of the invention because Song teaches that the structure or logical or electrical or an algorithm of a wireless communication system having a subfield is modifiable (see par. 0015). As per claims 2 and 19, Song teaches coding schemes comprising a low-density parity check (LDPC), 2X lifted low density parity check and binary convolutional coding (BCC) (see par. 0035 and 0060). As per claims 7 and 23, Song teaches that the user specific field (206) includes a beamforming subfield (see fig. 2 and par. 0052). Song teaches that the modulation and coding (MCS) subfield of the user specific filed supports both unequal modulation and newly added MCS’s using an unequal modulation pattern (see par. 0054). Song teaches that single user (SU) transmission includes a Common filed and a User Specific field that utilizes different requirements such as unequal modulation patterns (see par. 0034 et seq.). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 to 6, 8 to 12, 20-22 and 24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chen et al. (USPAP 2021/0045151) discloses physical layer preamble and signaling for wireless communication. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHELLY A CHASE whose telephone number is (571)272-3816. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 8:00-5:30, 2nd Friday 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Albert Decady can be reached at 571-272 3819. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Shelly A Chase/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2112
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603144
BLOCK HEALTH DETECTOR FOR BLOCK RETIREMENT IN A MEMORY SUB-SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603753
SIGNAL TRANSMITTING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596610
PARITY DATA IN DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM)
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12572413
MEMORY CONTROLLERS AND MEMORY SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12572412
MANAGING ERROR CORRECTIONS FOR DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+3.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 755 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month