Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/765,289

System and Method for Identifying Nearby, Compatible Users

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jul 07, 2024
Priority
Dec 05, 2011 — provisional 61/567,010 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUAN S
Art Unit
2179
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Zoosk Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
213 granted / 328 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
344
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
58.0%
+18.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 328 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Detailed Action This communication is responsive to CON filed on 07/07/2024. Claims 1-18 are pending in this application. Claims 1, 7 and 13 are independent claims. This Office Action is made Non-Final. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-18 of prior U.S. Patent No.12032811. Since the independent claims 1, 7 and 13 are rejected as statutory double patenting, their corresponding claims 2-6, 8-12 and 14-18 are also rejected under similar rationale. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN S NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7612. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (9-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fred Ehichioya can be reached at 571-272-4034. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN S NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2179
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769401
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR DETECTING MOTION GESTURE, AND OPERATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12754654
DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE AND DISPLAY CONTROL PROGRAM
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748914
USER INTERFACE GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR DIGITAL TASK SUBMISSION
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12725681
Electronic Chart Page Turning Method for User Interaction, and Computing Device for Performing Method
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12699577
DISPLAY METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.5%)
3y 4m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 328 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month