Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/765,466

COMPRESSOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 08, 2024
Examiner
BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
598 granted / 965 resolved
-8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 965 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/10/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 5-6, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fraser et al (US Patent No. 6,099,275). Fraser teaches: limitations from claim 1, a compressor (10) comprising: a valve plate (30) having a suction port (30-2); a cylinder (40) forming a compression chamber (40-3); a piston (42) in the compression chamber, and which is movable in the compression chamber; a suction valve unit (~20) coupled to the valve plate and having a suction valve (the portion of 20 extending over passages 30-2) which is movable, based on movement of the piston, to open and close the suction port (C. 4 Lines 24-31) and a discharge valve (50); the suction valve (20) including a valve hole (see annotated FIG. 2 below) therethrough which corresponds to the discharge port (30-3); and a cushioning member (60 or 20-1) disposed between the valve plate and the suction valve unit (FIG. 1-3), outside of the suction port, the cushioning member configured such that, with the suction valve moved to close the suction port, the cushioning member is elastically deformed by contact with the suction valve (C. 4 Lines 32-37 and 66-67); wherein the valve plate includes a receiving portion recessed from a side that faces the suction valve unit to receive the cushioning member, and two opposite ends of the cushioning member are disposed in the receiving portion between the valve plate and the suction valve unit (see annotated FIG. 3 below); PNG media_image1.png 444 520 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 340 566 media_image2.png Greyscale limitations from claim 2, wherein the cushioning member includes a leaf spring (C. 5 Lines 5-6); limitations from claim 5, wherein the receiving portion has an extension length extending in a length direction of the cushioning member (FIG. 2-3); limitations from claim 6, wherein the extension length of the receiving portion is longer than a length of the cushioning member (see FIG. 3 annotated below); PNG media_image3.png 220 592 media_image3.png Greyscale limitations from claim 13, wherein the suction valve unit includes an elastic plate (20), the suction valve is formed in the elastic plate and is configured so that movement to open the suction valve causes the suction valve to be elastically deformed from a side of the elastic plate (C. 4 Lines 24-31), and the cushioning member (20-1) is integrally formed with the suction valve (see FIG. 2-3; C. 4 Line 66 through C. 5 Line 4); Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fraser et al (US Patent No. 6,099,275). Regarding claim 7: Fraser teaches that the cushioning member (60) is a leaf spring (C. 5 Lines 5-6) rather than a wave spring; However, Fraser teaches that the spring may be embodied as other springs (C. 5 Lines 5-6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to choose a spring type for the cushioning member of Fraser, such as a wave spring, as a matter of design choice in order to reach an expected result, i.e. the cushioning of a valve closure. Fraser further teaches: limitations from claim 8, wherein the cushioning member includes a plurality of segments (20-1, and/or portions of spring 60 as seen in FIG. 3); Claim(s) 1, 3, 5, 9, and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 2007105745 (herein Hong) in view of Bortoli et al (US Patent No. 8,096,791). A machine translation of Hong was provided with a previous Office Action, and is relied upon herein. Hong teaches: limitations from claim 1, a compressor comprising: a valve plate (40) having a suction port (41); a cylinder (13) forming a compression chamber (13a); a piston (12) in the compression chamber, and which is movable in the compression chamber; a suction valve unit (50) coupled to the valve plate and having a suction valve (51-52) which is movable, based on movement of the piston, to open and close the suction port; and a cushioning member (90) disposed between the valve plate and the suction valve unit (see FIG. 3-4), outside of the suction port, the cushioning member configured such that, with the suction valve moved to close the suction port, the cushioning member is elastically deformed by contact with the suction valve (see Pages 6-7 and Lines 365-373 of the translation); wherein the valve plate includes a receiving portion recessed from a side that faces the suction valve unit to receive the cushioning member, and two opposite ends of the cushioning member are disposed in the receiving portion between the valve plate and the suction valve unit (see annotated FIG. 4 below); PNG media_image4.png 280 505 media_image4.png Greyscale Hong teaches a discharge port (42), but does not teach that the suction valve has an opening such that the discharge port corresponds to the opening; Hong instead teaches the suction valve and discharge port adjacent one another (FIG. 1); However, Bortoli teaches a compressor having a suction valve (10) opening and closing a suction port (4), and wherein the suction valve includes an opening (13) corresponding to a discharge port (3; FIG. 1); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of compressors at the time the invention was filed to form the suction valve assembly of Hong to have overlapping suction valve/discharge valve components, relying on a suction valve opening as taught by Bortoli, in order to reduce the footprint of the valve assemblies by axially aligning portions of each (discharge port and suction valve) for example. Hong further teaches: limitations from claim 3, wherein the valve plate further includes: a discharge valve (60) coupled to the valve plate and which is movable, based on movement of the piston, to open and close the discharge port (FIG. 2; Page 6 Lines 243-249), and the cushioning member does not block the suction port and does not block the discharge port (see FIG. 2-4 in which the member 90 is offset from the discharge port 42); limitations from claim 5, wherein the receiving portion has an extension length extending in a length direction of the cushioning member; PNG media_image5.png 190 342 media_image5.png Greyscale limitations from claim 9, wherein the cushioning member surrounds at least a portion of the suction port (see FIG. 3, the member 90 surrounds port 41); limitations from claim 12, wherein the suction valve unit includes an elastic plate (50), the suction valve (51-52) is formed in the elastic plate and is configured so that movement to open the suction valve causes the suction valve to be elastically deformed from a side of the elastic plate (see Page 5 Lines 232-233), and the receiving portion is configured to receive two opposite ends of the cushioning member so as to overlap a remaining area of the elastic plate where the suction valve is not formed (see FIG. 3-4; spring 90 has two ends within recess 44); Claim(s) 1 and 13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oyagi et al (US PGPub No. 2017/0009759) in view of Bortoli et al (US Patent No. 8,096,791). Oyagi teaches: limitations from claim 1, a compressor (FIG. 1) comprising: a valve plate (117) having a suction port (118); a cylinder (114) forming a compression chamber (113); a piston (16) in the compression chamber, and which is movable in the compression chamber; a suction valve unit (120) coupled to the valve plate and having a suction valve (120) which is movable, based on movement of the piston, to open and close the suction port (paragraph 59); and a cushioning member (160) disposed between the valve plate and the suction valve unit, outside of the suction port (see FIG. 3, 6, and 9 for example), the cushioning member configured such that, with the suction valve moved to close the suction port, the cushioning member is elastically deformed by contact with the suction valve (paragraphs 73, 97); wherein the valve plate includes a receiving portion recessed from a side that faces the suction valve unit to receive the cushioning member, and two opposite ends of the cushioning member are disposed in the receiving portion between the valve plate and the suction valve unit (see annotated FIG. 3 below); PNG media_image6.png 450 448 media_image6.png Greyscale Oyagi teaches a discharge port (119), but does not teach that the suction valve (120) has an opening such that the discharge port corresponds to the opening; Oyagi instead teaches the suction valve and discharge port adjacent one another (FIG. 2); However, Bortoli teaches a compressor having a suction valve (10) opening and closing a suction port (4), and wherein the suction valve includes an opening (13) corresponding to a discharge port (3; FIG. 1); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of compressors at the time the invention was filed to form the suction valve assembly of Oyagi to have overlapping suction valve/discharge valve components, relying on a suction valve opening as taught by Bortoli, in order to reduce the footprint of the valve assemblies by axially aligning portions of each (discharge port and suction valve) for example. Oyagi further teaches: limitations from claim 13, wherein the suction valve unit includes an elastic plate (120; paragraphs 59-61), the suction valve (120, 121) is formed in the elastic plate and is configured so that movement to open the suction valve causes the suction valve to be elastically deformed from a side of the elastic plate (paragraph 59), and the cushioning member is integrally formed with the suction valve (paragraph 108; wherein the resin 160 is applied to the valve 120); limitations from claim 14, wherein the suction valve includes: a valve neck (120b), and a valve head (120a) extending from the valve neck and having a shape corresponding to the suction port (see FIG. 4); Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/10/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant has amended the claims to include the limitations “wherein the valve plate includes a receiving portion recessed from a side that faces the suction valve unit to receive the cushioning member, and two opposite ends of the cushioning member are disposed in the receiving portion between the valve plate and the suction valve unit.”. Regarding Hong (KR 2007105745), applicant argues that the buffer member (spring 90) which is adhesively fixed to the bottom of a recess (groove 44) does not teach that two opposite ends of the cushioning member are disposed in the receiving portion between the valve plate and the suction valve unit. As in the above rejection the examiner maintains that, at least in the closed state, the spring 90 meets the limitations (see FIG. 4 as annotated below). PNG media_image4.png 280 505 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding Oyagi (US 2017/0009759), applicant argues that the buffer member (coating 160) does not teach the two ends of the cushioning member positioned between the valve plate and suction valve unit as claimed (applicant cites FIG. 6-7). However, as illustrated in FIG. 3 annotated below, the buffer 160 is located in a recess between the valve and the valve plate. PNG media_image6.png 450 448 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding Fraser, applicant argues that buffer member (60) does not have two ends disposed in the receiving portion between the valve plate and the suction valve. However, as illustrated in FIG. 3 below, the examiner maintains that spring (60) is positioned between plate (30) and valve 20 (see dashed lines in the annotated Figure). PNG media_image2.png 340 566 media_image2.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-11 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S BOBISH whose telephone number is (571)270-5289. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Essama Omgba can be reached at 469-295-9278. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S BOBISH/Examiner, Art Unit 3746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 26, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 26, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 09, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 08, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584468
FLUID SYSTEM WITH A PROPPANT MIXING PUMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584394
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO OPERATE A DUAL-SHAFT GAS TURBINE ENGINE FOR HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584481
FLUID END
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577954
AXIAL DIRECT DRIVE SEALLESS PUMP OR TURBINE WITH DEFORMATION-RESISTANT COVER PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560160
PUMP CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+29.4%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 965 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month