Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/765,610

TRIM EXCITATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 08, 2024
Priority
Jul 12, 2023 — EU 23185030.6
Examiner
ALLEN, ANDRE J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Stichting Koninklijk Nederlands Lucht-En Ruimtevaartcentrum
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1322 granted / 1446 resolved
+31.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§102
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1446 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/8/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities. Appropriate correction is required. Regarding claim 13 the recitation “non parallel” appears to be a typo. Suggested correction “non-parallel”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 8, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1 the recitation “…an eccentric drive pin mounted eccentrically on said drive shaft, which eccentric drive pin engages the drive channel of the transfer member…”, is NOT clearly defined. With emphasis on the term “which”, this is an indefinite on the grounds that it raises the question as to whether there are multiple eccentric drive pins. The current limitation raises a question with respect to the “drive pin” Suggested Limitation(s): “…an eccentric drive pin mounted eccentrically on said drive shaft, in which the eccentric drive pin engages the drive channel of the transfer member…”. “…an eccentric drive pin mounted eccentrically on said drive shaft, wherein the eccentric drive pin engages the drive channel of the transfer member…”. “an eccentric drive pin mounted eccentrically on said drive shaft, the eccentric drive pin adapted to engage the drive channel of the transfer member…”. Regarding claim 1 line 13 the limitation “….a guide configured to guide the transfer member back-and-forth in a direction substantially perpendicular to the drive channel axis.… “, is ambiguous and overly broad. With emphasis on the phrase “substantially perpendicular”, this is a relative phrase with respect to the structure and / or description of the claimed invention, the applicant has not clearly established (i.e dimensional characteristics etc) how “substantially” is defined. Therefore, the claim is rendered indefinite. Suggested Limitation(s): “…a guide configured to guide the transfer member back-and-forth in a direction perpendicular to the drive channel axis.…”. Regarding claim 1 line 16 the limitation “….the guide and transfer member are rotatable for assuming a desired rotational position between and including a first rotational position in which the drive channel axis extends substantially perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction (L) of the link member.… “, is ambiguous and overly broad. With emphasis on the phrase “substantially perpendicularly ”, this is a relative phrase with respect to the structure and / or description of the claimed invention, the applicant has not clearly established (i.e dimensional characteristics etc) how “substantially” is defined. Therefore, the claim is rendered indefinite. Suggested Limitation(s): “….the guide and transfer member are rotatable for assuming a desired rotational position between and including a first rotational position in which the drive channel axis extends perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction (L) of the link member.… “. Regarding claim 1 line 18 the limitation “….the link member and the guide is configured to move the transfer member back-and-forth substantially in the longitudinal direction of the link member.… “, is ambiguous and overly broad. With emphasis on the phrase “ back & forth substantially in the longitudinal direction”, this is a relative phrase with respect to the structure and / or description of the claimed invention, the applicant has not clearly established (i.e dimensional characteristics etc) how “substantially” is defined. Therefore, the claim is rendered indefinite. Suggested Limitation(s): “….the link member and the guide is configured to move the transfer member back-and-forth in the longitudinal direction of the link member.… “. Regarding claim 1 line 20 the limitation “….in which the drive channel axis extends substantially in the longitudinal direction (L) of the link member an.… “, is ambiguous and overly broad. With emphasis on the phrase “substantially in the longitudinal direction”, this is a relative phrase with respect to the structure and / or description of the claimed invention, the applicant has not clearly established (i.e dimensional characteristics etc) how “substantially” is defined. Therefore, the claim is rendered indefinite. Suggested Limitation(s): “….in which the drive channel axis extends in the longitudinal direction (L) of the link member an.… “. Regarding claim 1 line 21 the limitation “….the guide is configured to move the transfer member back-and-forth substantially perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction of the link member. “, is ambiguous and overly broad. With emphasis on the phrase “substantially perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction”, this is a relative phrase with respect to the structure and / or description of the claimed invention, the applicant has not clearly established (i.e dimensional characteristics etc) how “substantially” is defined. Therefore, the claim is rendered indefinite. Suggested Limitation(s): “….the guide is configured to move the transfer member back-and-forth perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction of the link member. “. Regarding claim 8 lines 3-4 the limitation “….which only allows said back-and-forth movement of the transfer member in said direction (D) substantially perpendicular to the drive channel axis… “, is ambiguous and overly broad. With emphasis on the phrase “substantially perpendicular”, this is a relative phrase with respect to the structure and / or description of the claimed invention, the applicant has not clearly established (i.e dimensional characteristics etc) how “substantially” is defined. Therefore, the claim is rendered indefinite. Suggested Limitation(s): “….which only allows said back-and-forth movement of the transfer member in said direction (D) perpendicular to the drive channel axis… “. Regarding claim 14 the limitation “…the pivot arm that extends substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal direction (L) ... “, is ambiguous and overly broad. With emphasis on the phrase “substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal direction”, this is a relative phrase with respect to the structure and / or description of the claimed invention, the applicant has not clearly established (i.e dimensional characteristics etc) how “substantially” is defined. Therefore, the claim is rendered indefinite. Suggested Limitation(s): Regarding claim 14 the limitation “…the pivot arm that extends perpendicular to the longitudinal direction (L) ... “. Regarding claim 14 the limitation “…the position of the pivot axis of the pivot arm is adjustable in a direction substantially in parallel to the longitudinal direction ... “, is ambiguous and overly broad. With emphasis on the phrase “substantially in parallel to the longitudinal direction”, this is a relative phrase with respect to the structure and / or description of the claimed invention, the applicant has not clearly established (i.e dimensional characteristics etc) how “substantially” is defined. Therefore, the claim is rendered indefinite. Claims 2-4, 5-7, 9-13, and 16-20 are rejected based on their dependency of rejected claims 1, 8, 14 and 15. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-20 would be allowable based on their dependency of claim 1. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Cotrell et al discloses A system for fatigue testing wind turbine blades through forced or resonant excitation of the base of a blade . The system includes a test stand ) and a restoring spring assembly mounted on the test stand. The restoring spring assembly includes a primary spring element that extends outward from the test stand to a blade mounting plate configured to receive a base of blade . During fatigue testing, a supported base of a blade may be pivotally mounted to the test stand via the restoring spring assembly . The system may include an excitation input assembly that is interconnected with the blade mounting plate to selectively apply flapwise, edgewise, and/or pitch excitation forces. The restoring spring assembly may include at least one tuning spring member positioned adjacent to the primary spring element used to tune the spring constant or stiffness of the primary spring element in one of the excitation directions. (Abstract) The cited pertinent art of record does not anticipate nor render obvious a guide configured to guide a transfer member back-and-forth in a direction perpendicular to a drive channel axis, wherein the guide and transfer member are rotatable for assuming a desired rotational position between and including a first rotational position in which the drive channel axis extends perpendicularly to a longitudinal direction (L) of a link member and the guide is configured to move the transfer member back-and-forth in the longitudinal direction of the link member, and a second rotational position in which the drive channel axis extends in the longitudinal direction (L) of the link member and the guide is configured to move the transfer member back-and-forth perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction of the link member. Conclusion US 10337969 B2 High speed vacuum cycling excitation system for optical inspection systems US 10876943 B2 High speed vacuum cycling excitation system for optical inspection systems US 11933067 B2 System for identification and active control of vibrations in a structure and relating method WO 2023195501 A1 TEST DEVICE, HEDGE TRIMMER, AND ELECTRIC ACTUATOR RU 2664982 C1 STAND FOR TESTS OF HELICOPTER ELEMENTS WITH COAXIAL SCREWS RU 2628873 C2 STAND FOR TESTING ELEMENTS OF BELILIARY HELICOPTER WITH OUTSIDE SCREWS WO 2011061141 A1 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING FATIGUE FOR MECHANICAL COMPONENTS OF AN AIRCRAFT AND AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE METHOD Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDRE J ALLEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2174. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9am-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina M Deherrera can be reached at (303) 297-4237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDRE J ALLEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680916
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING A STATUS OF A TYRE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678972
FRICTION-BASED TACTILE SENSOR FOR MEASURING GRIP SECURITY
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680927
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONING MECHANICAL TEST SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674738
OBSERVATION CHIP
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674910
Device and Method for Monitoring and Early Warning Information Perception Regarding Urban Yellow Mud
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1446 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month