Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/766,289

PAPER FEED DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 08, 2024
Examiner
GOKHALE, PRASAD V
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
832 granted / 968 resolved
+34.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1001
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 968 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sato (JP 2016-121005). Regarding Claim 1, Sato discloses A paper feed device including a device body (10) and a paper feed cassette (20) that is inserted into the device body along an insertion direction (A2, Fig. 1), the paper feed device comprising: a lock lever (45) mounted to the paper feed cassette via a lever shaft (42); a spring (44) that applies a rotational force that rotates the lock lever in an engagement direction (i.e. toward 51 in Fig. 7A); and a lock member (51) provided at the device body, wherein: the lock lever has a projection portion (45a) provided at a tip end (i.e. the end of 45 opposite to 42) extending from the lever shaft toward a downstream side in the insertion direction (Fig. 2), the lock member has an inclined area, a parallel area, and an engagement area (i.e. see Fig. 6 mark-up below for these three areas) in this stated order from upstream to downstream in the insertion direction (i.e. right to left in Fig. 6), and the projection portion contacts the lock member in the stated order of the inclined area, the parallel area, and the engagement area when the paper cassette is stored in the device body, the parallel area has a plane parallel to the insertion direction (Fig. 3, Fig. 6), the inclined area has an inclined surface, on a side surface of the lock member, on a side of a pull-out direction (i.e. on the right side in Fig. 6), the pull-out direction being a direction, in which the paper cassette is pulled out of the device body (i.e. pulled out to the right in Fig. 6), that guides the projection portion into the parallel area, and the projection portion contacts the parallel area at a diagonal angle seen from above (i.e. when the cassette is inserted from the right to left direction in Fig 6 and is at a position where 45a contacts the parallel area, it can be seen that the arm of 45 would be inclined downwards to the left/at a diagonal angle. This would furthermore be visible from a point just above 45. It is noted the claim does not require the projection portion to contact the parallel area from above or to contact its uppermost surface). Regarding Claim 2, Sato discloses the lever shaft (42) is provided lower, in position, than the parallel area (see Fig. 6 mark-up below). Regarding Claim 3, Sato discloses a handle (25) provided at the paper feed cassette so as to move the paper feed cassette back and forth, and is gripped by a user when pulling out the paper feed cassette, wherein the lock lever is rotated in an opposite direction of the engagement direction via the lever shaft by the user pulling the handle (see Fig. 7A to 7B). Regarding Claim 6, Sato discloses An image forming apparatus (1) comprising the paper feed device according to claim 1. PNG media_image1.png 730 786 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments In response to Applicant’s argument that “Specifically, as clearly shown in FIG. 6a of Sato (an annotated version of which is reproduced above for better clarity), a tip end 45a contacts a parallel area from below in a vertical direction. That is, in Sato, the tip end 45a does NOT contact the parallel area at a diagonal angle seen from above.“, it is noted that the tip end 45a contacts the parallel area at a diagonal angle seen from above, as per the Claim 1 rejection above. However, it is noted that the claim does not require it to contact the parallel area from above or to contact its uppermost surface, merely to contact the parallel area at an angle, that can be seen from above. Applicant's arguments filed 1/16/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PRASAD GOKHALE whose telephone number is (571)270-3543. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at (571) 272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PRASAD V GOKHALE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653 February 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 08, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602071
VEHICLE PADS THAT EMULATE TRADITIONAL VEHICLE PEDALS AND INCLUDE MECHANICAL HYSTERESIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589968
GUIDE MECHANISM AND PAPER SHEET HANDLING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589959
MEDIUM CONVEYANCE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585300
COLLECTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A ROTORCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577068
SHEET FEEDING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 968 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month