Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/766,921

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SIGNALING SCHEME FOR CAST-TYPE INDICATION AND RESOURCE INDICATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Priority
Apr 07, 2020 — CN PCT/CN2020/083600 +2 more
Examiner
TRAN, PHUC H
Art Unit
2471
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
959 granted / 1046 resolved
+33.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1083
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1046 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 16-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: the term “non-transitory” should be added to claims 16-20 as claim 15. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6,8-13,15-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (Pub. No. 20220217767). - With respect to claims 1, 8 and 15, Lee teaches a method performed by a UE, the method comprising: reserving one or more resources for a sidelink channel (see par. 156 discloses “a transmitting UE may reserve/select one or more transmission resources for sidelink transmission”); identifying one or more preempted resources from the one or more resources for the sidelink (see par. 173 discloses “the transmitting UE may perform a preemption check and resource reselection determination for a reserved resource for which actual packet transmission is not performed. Alternatively, for example, the preemption check and resource reselection determination for the reserved resource signaled by the SCI may be performed when a packet (e.g., MAC PDU) to be transmitted through the corresponding reserved resource is available”); and performing a sidelink channel occupancy radio (SL CR) evaluation (see par. 174 discloses “the UE so that a Channel occupancy Ratio (CR) calculation related to sidelink communication is performed. For example, the UE may perform CR calculation related to sidelink communication”), wherein the preempted resources are counted as unused in the SL CR evaluation (it is inherently to understand when the calculation the occupancy as the unused in the SL CR). - With respect to claims 2, 9, 16, Lee teaches wherein the one or more preempted resources comprise reserved resources preempted by a second UE (e.g. par. 157 discloses the reserve resources for receiving UEs as the preempted by a second UE). - With respect to claims 3, 10, 17, Lee teaches wherein the one or more resources reserved by the UE are preempted by another UE with higher priority data (e.g. par. 181-182 discloses the high priority packet of UE for the transmission resource which consider as the preempted by another UE with higher priority data). - With respect to claims 4, 11, Lee teaches wherein the one or more preempted resources are not counted as used in the SL CR evaluation (it is inherently to understand that the evaluation as calculation for occupation of the resource see par. 174-175). - With respect to claims 5, 12, 18, Lee teaches wherein the one or more preempted resources comprise a sub-portion of the one or more resources reserved by the UE (e.g. the Fig. 5 discloses frame, subframe, slots). - With respect to claims 6, 13, 19, Lee teaches further comprising releasing the one or more preempted resources due to preemption (see par. 183 discloses the release operation on the overlapping transmission resource consider as preemption). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 14, 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. . Examiner's Note: Examiner has cited particular paragraphs or columns and line numbers in the references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHUC H TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3172. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 Flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sujoy K. Kundu can be reached at 571-272-8586. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUC H TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2471
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 09, 2024
Application Filed
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684371
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZED LTE PRIVATE NETWORKS
3y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683708
WAVEFORM CONTROL METHOD, RADIO DEVICE, AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676655
CSI REPORTING METHOD, CSI RECEIVING METHOD, AND CORRESPONDING APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666369
SRS POWER CONTROL METHODS FOR CHANNEL ESTIMATION OF RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACE LINK
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665642
CRITERION-TRIGGERED CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REPORTING CONFIGURATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+2.3%)
2y 9m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1046 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month