Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/767,031

Electromagnetic Fuel Injector With Two Independent Coils and Related Control Method

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Examiner
LEE, CHEE-CHONG
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Marelli Europe S P A
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
485 granted / 760 resolved
-6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +54% interview lift
Without
With
+53.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
80 currently pending
Career history
840
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 760 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "…when the plunger is close to the open position, also the secondary electromagnet so that the secondary electromagnet…" in lines 27-29. It appears to be idiomatically and/or grammatically incorrect. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the movable armature" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hohl (US6796511). With respect to claim 1, Hohl discloses an electromagnetic fuel injector (Figs. 1 and 2) comprising: a tubular support body (3, 4); an injection nozzle (13, 16) arranged at an (lower) end of the support body; an injection valve (at 22) coupled to the injection nozzle; a plunger (13, 18), which is movable, so as to adjust the fuel flow through the injection nozzle, between a closed position (Fig. 1) and an open (lower and upper switch) position (Col. 3, lines 16-38. Fig. 2) of the injection valve; an electromagnetic actuator (1 and supply of current to the solenoid coils. Col. 1, line 59) provided with a main electromagnet (5, 9) configured (capable of), when it is activated, to apply a force to the plunger, which pushes the plunger towards the open position of the injection valve and provided with a secondary electromagnet (6, 10) configured (capable of), when it is activated, to apply a force to the plunger, which pushes the plunger towards the closed position of the injection valve; a closing spring (11, 12) configured to (capable of) push the plunger towards the closed position of the injection valve; and a control unit (supply of current to the solenoid coils. Col. 1, line 59) configured (capable of), so as to open the injection valve, to activate the main electromagnet so that the main electromagnet generates a magnetic force moving the plunger towards the open position, overcoming the elastic force of the closing spring; wherein the control unit is configured to (capable of) activate, during the opening of the injection valve and when the plunger is close to the open position, also the secondary electromagnet so that the secondary electromagnet generates a magnetic force (during partial stroke of valve stroke h in Fig. 2) slowing down the movement of the plunger towards the open position. With respect to claim 2, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 1, wherein the electromagnetic actuator comprises one single armature (12), which is movable, is integral (as one unit) with the plunger and is shared by both electromagnets (12 movement is controlled by 9 and 18), since it is subjected to the magnetic forces generated by both electromagnets. With respect to claim 3, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 2, wherein: the main electromagnet comprises a main armature (9), which is integral (as one unit) with the support body, and a main coil (5), which is arranged in the area of the main armature; the secondary electromagnet comprises a secondary armature (10), which is integral (as one unit) with the support body, and a secondary coil (6), which is arranged in the area of the secondary armature; and the armature is arranged between the main armature and the secondary armature (Fig. 1). With respect to claim 4, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 3, wherein: the closed position of the injection valve is determined by a contact of a shutter (14) of the plunger against a valve seat (15) of the injection valve; and the open position of the injection valve is determined by a contact of (12 and 9) the movable armature against the main armature. With respect to claim 5, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 3, wherein: the two coils of the two electromagnets are not connected to each other in series or in parallel; and the control unit is configured to (capable of) electrically power the two coils of the two electromagnets independently of each other (Fig. 2). With respect to claim 6, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 3, wherein the control unit is configured (capable of), so as to open the injection valve, to: activate the main electromagnet so that the main electromagnet generates a magnetic force (at 5) attracting the armature towards the main armature, overcoming the elastic force of the closing spring, thus moving the armature towards the open position; and also activate, when the armature is close to the open position, the secondary electromagnet, so that the secondary electromagnet generates a magnetic force (during partial stroke of valve stroke h in Fig. 2) attracting the armature towards the secondary armature, consequently slowing down the movement of the armature towards the open position. With respect to claim 7, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 6, wherein the control unit is configured to (capable of) deactivate the secondary electromagnet before the armature reaches the open position (Fig. 2). With respect to claim 8, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 6, wherein the control unit is configured (capable of), so as to close the injection valve, to: turn the main electromagnet off, so that the armature is pushed towards the closed position by the elastic force generated by the closing spring; and activate, when the armature is close to the closed position, the main electromagnet, so that the main electromagnet generates a magnetic force (during partial stroke of valve stroke h in Fig. 2) attracting the armature towards the main armature, consequently slowing down the movement of the armature towards the closed position. With respect to claim 9, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 8, wherein the control unit is configured to (capable of) deactivate the main electromagnet before the armature reaches the closed position (Fig. 2). With respect to claim 10, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 1, wherein the control unit is configured to (capable of) deactivate the secondary electromagnet before the plunger reaches the open position (Fig. 2). With respect to claim 11, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 1, wherein the control unit is configured (capable of), so as to close the injection valve, to turn the main electromagnet off, so that the plunger is pushed towards the closed position by the elastic force generated by the closing spring; and activate, when the plunger is close to the closed position, the main electromagnet, so that the main electromagnet slows down the movement of the plunger towards the closed position (Fig. 2). With respect to claim 12, Hohl discloses the electromagnetic injector according to claim 11, wherein the control unit is configured to (capable of) deactivate the main electromagnet before the plunger reaches the closed position. With respect to claim 13, Hohl discloses a control method (Figs. 1 and 2) to control an electromagnetic fuel injector (1) comprising: a tubular support body; an injection nozzle arranged at an end of the support body (3, 4); an injection valve (at 22) coupled to the injection nozzle; a plunger (13, 18), which is movable, so as to adjust the fuel flow through the injection nozzle, between a closed position (Fig. 1) and an open (lower and upper switch) position (Col. 3, lines 16-38. Fig. 2) of the injection valve; an electromagnetic actuator (1 and supply of current to the solenoid coils. Col. 1, line 59) provided with a main electromagnet (5, 9) configured (capable of), when it is activated, to apply a force to the plunger, which pushes the plunger towards the open position of the injection valve and provided with a secondary electromagnet (6, 10) configured (capable of), when it is activated, to apply a force to the plunger, which pushes the plunger towards the closed position of the injection valve; and a closing spring (11, 12) configured to (capable of) push the plunger towards the closed position of the injection valve; the control method, so as to open the injection valve, comprises the steps of: activating the main electromagnet so that the main electromagnet generates a magnetic force moving the plunger towards the open position, overcoming the elastic force of the closing spring; and activating, during the opening of the injection valve and when the plunger is close to the open position, also the secondary electromagnet, so that the secondary electromagnet generates a magnetic force (during partial stroke of valve stroke h in Fig. 2) slowing down the movement of the plunger towards the open position. With respect to claim 14, Hohl discloses the control method according 13 comprising the steps of: turning the main electromagnet off (of I1), so that the plunger is pushed towards the closed position by the elastic force generated by the spring; and activating, when the armature is close to the closed position, the main electromagnet, so that the main electromagnet slows down the movement of the plunger towards the closed position (during partial stroke of valve stroke h in Fig. 2). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following patents are cited to show the art with respect to an electromagnetic injector: Wakeman, Cerny, Ohno et al., Varble et al., Timms, Male et al. and Harcombe et al. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHEE-CHONG LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-1916. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am -5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur O. Hall can be reached at (571)270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHEE-CHONG LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752 February 9, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 09, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599920
Hand-held wireless electric sprayer
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595776
GAS INJECTOR WITH DAMPING DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR FOR SHORT STROKES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589269
BATTERY MODULE CAPABLE OF SUPPRESSING SPREAD OF BATTERY FIRE AND CONTROL METHOD OF SUPPRESSING SPREAD OF BATTERY FIRE THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589416
Pressure washer apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583001
SPRAY GUN AND COMPONENTS FOR SPRAYING PAINTS AND OTHER COATINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+53.6%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 760 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month