Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/767,062

FALL PROTECTION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Priority
Jul 18, 2023 — provisional 63/514,272
Examiner
WILEY, DANIEL J
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Delta Prevention Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
573 granted / 801 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+37.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
816
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 801 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2015/0041744 to Higgs (hereinafter “Higgs”). -From Claim 1: Higgs discloses a base 10 for a safety system, the base comprising: a clamp 30 opening on a top surface thereof; channels 27 running on a bottom surface of the base from opposite side walls of the base; and a through hole 25 from the top surface to the bottom surface; wherein said clamp is configured to receive a bottom end of a post 48 in the safety system. -From Claim 2: Higgs discloses wherein said bottom end is further secured to said clamp using a screw inserted through one of said side walls. (¶53) -From Claim 4: Higgs discloses wherein said base is a first one of at least two said bases stacked one on top of the other using a post inserted in through respective through hole. (¶55) -From Claim 5: Higgs discloses wherein at least one of the side walls of the base comprises at least one insert housing 40, 41. -From Claim 7: Higgs discloses wherein at least one of the side walls of the base comprises at least one insert cutout 27 and a kickplate bracket 37 attached to the insert cutout. -From Claim 9: Higgs discloses a base 10 for a safety system, the base comprising: a top surface, a bottom surface and side walls; at least one clamp 30 opening in said top surface; at least one channel 27 in said bottom surface; and at least one through hole 25 from said bottom surface to said top surface; wherein at least one of : i) the safety system comprises a post 48, said clamp 30 receives an end of the post and the end of the post is secured to the clamp opening using a fastener inserted from one of said side wall into abutment with the post in the clamp opening; (¶53) -From Claim 11: Higgs discloses a system comprising at least a first base and a second base (See Fig. 17), each comprising at least one clamp 30 opening in a top surface thereof, a bottom surface, side walls, at least one channel 27 in said bottom surface; and at least one through hole 25 from said bottom surface to said top surface; wherein at least one of: iii) the system comprises a post 48, the post is inserted through the through hole of the first base and the through hole of the second bases; -From Claim 18: Higgs discloses wherein the bases 10 are molded in a plastic material (¶20) with the clamp integrated therein. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Higgs. -From Claims 16 and 17: Higgs does not specifically disclose wherein the bases are molded in rubber, and/or with the clamp and channels integrated therein. Rather Higgs only discloses the bases being made of polymeric materials and/or injection molding techniques (¶20) However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Higgs by making the bases and the clamps therein out of molded rubber since this would involve a mere change of material, and it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 6, 8, 10, and 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The channels in Higgs, such as they are, do not cross along the bottom surface of the base, nor does Higgs contemplate the disposition of posts within such channels as part of assembling the safety system. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, as the cited references include structure similar to that of the presently claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL J WILEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7324. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 9am-5pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached at 5712705281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL J WILEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3678 3/23/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698805
DRIVE UNIT AND CONNECTION SHAFT FOR A DRIVE UNIT
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698806
STEERING SHAFT ASSEMBLY
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692887
Anti-Pinch Cover
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687025
SINGLE MOUNT TENSIONER AND WIRE ATTACHMENT SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680310
METHODS OF ASSEMBLING A CABLE RAIL ASSEMBLY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.6%)
2y 8m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 801 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month