Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/767,457

INKJET RECORDING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Examiner
QUINN, NATASHA DEPHENIA
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
10 granted / 11 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
35
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
70.6%
+30.6% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 11 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/09/2024 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hisashi (JP 2010023374 A) in view of Hitoshi et al. (EP 1162072 A1). Regarding claim 1, Hisashi teaches an inkjet recording apparatus (Figure 1 displays an “ink jet printer 1” described in paragraph [0016]) comprising: a recording head (Figure 1 displays “four inkjet heads 2” described in paragraph [0017]) that includes a plurality of nozzles which discharge an ink (Figure 2 displays the “plurality of minute nozzles 2” that eject ink described in paragraph [0019]); a conveyance member (Figure 1 displays the “conveyance belt 8” described in paragraph [0018]) that includes an opening through which the ink discharged from the recording head passes (Figure 3 displays the “plurality of through holes 18” that are evenly disposed over the surface of the “conveyance belt 8” described in paragraph [0023].), and conveys a recording medium (Figure 1 displays the “paper P” described in paragraph [0018]); a control unit (Figure 6 displays the “control unit 60” described in paragraph [0016]) that controls drive of the recording head and the conveyance member to perform flushing which discharges the ink from the nozzles of the recording head to cause the ink to pass through the opening (Paragraph [0040] describes how the “control unit 60” controls the “head drive circuit 71” that makes the “nozzles 2” discharge ink to the “ink tray 32” through the “holes” for flushing.); an ink collection unit (Figure 1 displays the “suction box 30” described in paragraph [0032].) that is arranged opposite the recording head through the conveyance member (Figure 1 displays how the “suction box 30” is disposed at an overlapping position of the “four inkjet heads 2”, paragraph [0033], and collects the discharged ink from the “holes 18 and 19” of the “conveyor belt 8”, paragraph [0036].) and includes an ink reception portion which receives the ink that has passed through the opening when the flushing is performed (Figure 5 displays an “ink tray 32” described in paragraphs [0033]-[0035].); an ink passage (Figure 5 displays the “filter 34” described in paragraph [0035].) which is formed between the conveyance member and the ink reception portion and through which the ink that has passed through the opening passes (Paragraph [0035] describes how the “filer 34” captures the discharged ink from the “inkjet head 2” and disposes it to the “ink tray 32”.); and a suction unit that is coupled to the ink reception portion (Figure 1 displays the “rotary fan 5 (suction means)” that is connected to the “ink tray 32” described in paragraph [0028].) and sucks the ink that has passed through the opening together with air in the ink passage (paragraph [0036] describes how the ink is suctioned ), wherein in the conveyance member, an air circulation hole is formed on an upstream side of the opening in a conveyance direction (Figure 5 displays an “elongated through holes 19” that are disposed on the “conveyance belt 8” facing the same direction as the “holes 18” in the upward direction facing the “four inkjet heads 2” described in paragraph [0022].), and a distance between the opening and the air circulation hole in the conveyance direction is smaller than a width of the ink passage in the conveyance direction (Figure 5 displays how the distance between the “holes 18 and 19” is less than the width of the “filter 34” in the same direction as the direction the “conveyance belt 8” moves.). Hisashi fails to teach the timing for flushing is different from timing contributing to image recording. However, Hitoshi teaches the timing for flushing is different from timing contributing to image recording (Paragraph [0017] describes how the timing of the printing is mased on the timing after the cleaning operation indicating that the timing for cleaning and printing are different.). Hisashi and Hitoshi are considered analogous to the art because they are in the same field involving an inkjet recording apparatus. Therefore, it would be obvious for someone with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the inkjet recording apparatus taught by Hisashi to also apply the timing for flushing being different from timing contributing to image recording taught by Hitoshi. This would have been done for the purpose of preventing unsatisfactory ejection of ink (Hitoshi, paragraph [0017]). Regarding claim 2, Hisashi teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, Hisashi further discloses wherein in the conveyance member, one or more opening groups are formed, and each of the opening groups includes a plurality of the openings which are arranged in the conveyance direction of the recording medium and in a width direction orthogonal to the conveyance direction, the opening group includes a most upstream opening that is located on a most upstream side in the conveyance direction (Figure 3 displays the “holes 18” are grouped and how the “elongated through holes 19” are between the group of “holes 18”. Figure 5 displays an “elongated through holes 19” that are disposed on the “conveyance belt 8” facing the same direction as the “holes 18” in the upward direction facing the “four inkjet heads 2” described in paragraph [0022].) and a distance between the most upstream opening and the air circulation hole in the conveyance direction is smaller than the width of the ink passage in the conveyance direction. (Figure 5 displays how the distance between the “holes 18 and 19” is less than the width of the “filter 34” in the same direction as the direction the “conveyance belt 8” moves.) Regarding claim 3, Hisashi teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, Hisashi further discloses wherein a plurality of the openings are spaced a predetermined distance from each other in a width direction (Figure 5 displays the “holes 18” on the surface of the “conveyance belt 8” that are evenly distributed described in paragraph [0023].), and a same number of the air circulation holes as the openings are spaced the predetermined distance from each other (Figure 3 displays how there is an equal amount of “holes 18” and “holes 19” in each row at similar distances from each other.). Regarding claim 4, Hisashi teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, Hisashi further discloses wherein in the conveyance member, a large number of suction holes are formed, and an air flow for sucking the recording medium to the conveyance member by negative pressure suction flows through the suction holes (Figure 5 displays how the “holes 18” and “elongated thorough holes 19” are distributed throughout the “conveyance belt 8” and suction the discharged ink when the “rotary fan 5” to suck air into the “suction box 30” described in paragraph [0036].), and the suction holes which are formed immediately on the upstream side of the opening in the conveyance direction also serve as the air circulation holes. (Figure 3 displays the “holes 18” and the “elongated thorough holes 19” evenly distributed all along the surface of the “conveyance belt 8” and paragraph [0006] describes how the holes function as a suction means to help the recording medium suction to the conveyance belt and to suction ink during flushing.) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATASHA DEPHENIA QUINN whose telephone number is (571)272-6375. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6:30 - 4:00 CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas Rodriguez can be reached at (571)431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.D.Q./Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /DOUGLAS X RODRIGUEZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596250
LIGHT SCANNING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576640
LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD, LIQUID DISCHARGE DEVICE, AND LIQUID DISCHARGE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12552161
RECORDING ELEMENT UNIT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING RECORDING ELEMENT UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12552155
Drive Circuit And Liquid Ejecting Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12547093
LIGHT SCANNING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 11 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month