Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/767,802

TECHNIQUES FOR DE-IDENTIFYING SENSOR DATA CAPTURED IN A MEDICAL FACILITY ROOM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Examiner
SWEARINGEN, JEFFREY R
Art Unit
2445
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Exin Health, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
514 granted / 676 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
698
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 676 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Li et al. (US 2023/0409749). In regard to claim 1, Li disclosed a computer-implemented method for de-identifying data captured in medical facility rooms, the method comprising: receiving, at one or more edge devices operating within a security boundary of a medical facility, a set of streams of sensor data captured in a set of medical facility rooms in the medical facility; Li [0061]-[0063] for each stream of the set of streams of sensor data, generating, at the one or more edge devices, a de-identified data stream at least based on redacting from the stream information that identifies one or more persons, and Li [0063] generating, at the one or more edge devices, identity-neutral metadata associated with the de-identified data stream at least based on extracting from the stream information that describes the identified persons in a manner that does not reveal the identity of the identified persons; and Li [0254] transmitting the de-identified data streams and the associated identity-neutral metadata for further processing outside of the security boundary of the medical facility. Li [0061] In regard to claim 2, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein each stream of the set of streams of sensor data is captured using one of the following sensors: a visual sensor, an audio sensor, a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, a vibration sensor, or an ambient light sensor. Li [0062] In regard to claim 3, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein a stream of the set of streams of sensor data comprises a video stream captured by a visual sensor in a medical facility room of the set of operation rooms, and wherein generating a de-identified data stream is further based on redacting from the stream sensitive information related to a human body. Li [0065] In regard to claim 4, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein a stream of the set of streams of sensor data comprises a video stream captured by a visual sensor in a medical facility room of the set of operation rooms, and wherein redacting from the stream information that identifies one or more persons comprises redacting images of the identified persons. Li [0069] In regard to claim 5, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein a stream of the set of streams of sensor data comprises an audio stream captured by an audio sensor in a medical facility room of the set of operation rooms, and wherein redacting from the stream information that identifies one or more persons comprises redacting personal identifying information (PII) information from identified text in the stream. Li [0097] In regard to claim 6, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein a stream of the set of streams of sensor data comprises a video stream captured by a visual sensor in a medical facility room of the set of operation rooms, and wherein extracting from the stream information that describes the identified persons in a manner that does not reveal the identity of the identified persons comprises detecting events related to the identified persons in one or more video frames of the stream. Li [0069] In regard to claim 7, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein a stream of the set of streams of sensor data comprises a video stream captured by a visual sensor in a medical facility room of the set of operation rooms, and wherein extracting from the stream information that describes the identified persons in a manner that does not reveal the identity of the identified persons comprises extracting a skeleton body structure for each of the identified persons in each video frame of the stream. Li [0153]-[0155] In regard to claim 8, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein a stream of the set of streams of sensor data comprises an audio stream captured by an audio sensor in a medical facility room of the set of operation rooms, and wherein extracting from the stream information that describes the identified persons in a manner that does not reveal the identity of the identified persons comprises extracting from the stream non-person specific voiceprints. Li [0097] In regard to claim 9, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 1, the method further comprising: for each stream of the set of streams of sensor data, generating identity-specific metadata based on extracting from the stream information that identifies a specific person. Li [0254] In regard to claim 10, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the stream comprises a video stream captured by a visual sensor in a medical facility room of the set of operation rooms, and wherein extracting from the stream information that identifies a specific person comprises generating a de-identified visual model of the person based on images of the person. Li [0069] In regard to claim 11, Li disclosed the computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the stream comprises an audio stream captured by an audio sensor in a medical facility room of the set of operation rooms, and wherein extracting from the stream information that identifies a specific person comprises generating a person-specific voiceprint of the person. Li [0097] Claim 12 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 1. Claim 13 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 3. Claim 14 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 4. Claim 15 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 5. Claim 16 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 6. Claim 17 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 7. Claim 18 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 8. Claim 19 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 9. Claim 20 is rejected for substantially the same reasons as claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hastings et al. US 2024/0244315 Stoyanov US 2023/0315905 Prevrhal et al. US 2024/0386140 Chen et al. US 2023/0352133 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jeffrey R. Swearingen whose telephone number is (571)272-3921. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oscar Louie can be reached at 571-270-1684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Jeffrey R. Swearingen Primary Examiner Art Unit 2445 /Jeffrey R Swearingen/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2445
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 09, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598106
POLICY MANAGEMENT AND ENFORCEMENT IN A GREEN ELASTIC NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585642
Natural language interface for querying cloud security logs
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587563
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND REMEDIATING DDOS ATTACKS BASED ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585797
FEDERATED DATA QUERY METHODS AND APPARATUSES BASED ON PRIVACY PRESERVING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579315
Systems and methods for removing sensitive data from a cloud-based system
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.4%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 676 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month