Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/767,874

PALATAL ANCHORAGE DEVICE FOR ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT WITH ENHANCED SUPPORT AND METHOD MANUFACTURING PALATAL ANCHORAGE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Examiner
MORAN, EDWARD JOHN
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allow Rate
262 granted / 633 resolved
-28.6% vs TC avg
Strong +60% interview lift
Without
With
+60.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
684
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 633 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I in the reply filed on 1/13/26 is acknowledged. Claim 2 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/13/26. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Appropriate correction is required. The term “screw fixation parts and formed” should read “screw fixation parts are formed”. The term “locking protrusions and spaced apart” should read “locking protrusions that are spaced apart” or the like. In the last line of the claim the term “and” should be deleted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the term “with enhanced support” is indefinite as it is unclear what would or would not be considered “enhanced” (e.g. the limitation is a term or degree), and/or it is unclear what the support is enhanced compared too. Still further, the Examiner notes the degree of support is variable dependent on a particular patient. Next the term “or specifically, extend on both sides from both vertices at a rear end of the body” is indefinite as it is unclear whether or not the term is positively recited and required by the claim. In other words, the term “or specifically” renders the claim unclear as to whether the hook parts only must extend from a sides of the triangular truss or require the more specific “extend on both sides from both vertices at a rear end”. As best understood by the Examiner, as the term “or” is present, the term is interpreted as a choice, that is prior art which discloses one or the other reads on the limitation, and the term “or specifically” is treated as an optional recitation, which the Examiner does not chose for claim interpretation (see below). Finally, the term “round parts 125” is indefinite, as it appears a typographical error has occurred; as best understood by the Examiner the number 125 should be deleted and will be interpreted as such. Clarification is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee (KR 101425783 B1; see Machine Translation, attached). Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses a palatal anchorage device (see Figs. 1-6) for orthodontic treatment with enhanced support (e.g. compared to a device with fewer anchorage screws), comprising: a body (10) having a form of a triangular truss (11; disposes screw fixation parts in a triangular arrangement as shown in Fig. 6, thereby forming a triangular truss); screw fixation parts (12) and (are) formed on each of three vertex regions of the body (see vertices as shown in Fig. 6), with through-holes formed therein to allow a screw to be placed in a palate (see Figs. 4 and 10); and hook parts (13) extending from both sides of the body and hooking and fixing an elastic body connected to a tooth fixture (capable of being used with an appropriately sized and fixed elastic body; elastic body and fixture not positively recited, required nor part of claimed anchorage device), wherein the screw fixation parts (12) include a front screw fixation part formed on a front vertex of the body (e.g. upper instance of 12 in Fig. 6), and a pair of rear screw fixation parts formed on both rear vertices of the body (e.g. bottom instances of 12 in Fig. 6), the pair of rear screw fixation parts are symmetrically formed with respect to the front screw fixation part (see Fig. 6 and Machine Translation, page 5 paragraphs 5-6), the hook parts (13) are configured to extend from a side of the triangular truss form of the body (see Fig. 6), or specifically, extend on both sides from both vertices at a rear end of the body (alternate interpretation of extending from a side of the body chosen, see above; as best understood by the Examiner), such that the front screw fixation part supports the pair of rear screw fixation parts so that the pair of rear screw fixation parts is not moved forward even when a force to move the pair of rear screw fixation parts forward is generated by a pulling force of the elastic body (capable of being used as such; at least in part as the device is screwed into the palate, and as such, front screw would support rear screws, such that rear parts are not moved), the body has a form of an isosceles triangle, wherein the isosceles triangle has a length of a base of the isosceles triangle less than a height (see Fig. 6 and machine translation, page 5, paragraphs 5-6), a spacing between the pair of rear screw fixation parts is configured to be shorter than a shortest straight line distance from the pair of rear screw fixation parts to the front screw fixture (e.g. distance a is less than distance b, as shown in Fig. 6 and page 5, paragraphs 5-6), the hook parts include a plurality of locking protrusions (11a; ligature or elastic can be locked thereto) and (that are) spaced apart at predetermined intervals to be locked with the elastic body so that the elastic body is fixed in position (capable of being used as such), and the hook parts further include, at ends of the hook parts, round parts (e.g. rounded/curved distal (left and right) most ends of 13, see Fig. 6) rounded to prevent the elastic body from being caught at the ends of the hook parts when the elastic body is released from the hook protrusions (capable of being used as such). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see attached PTO892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD MORAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5349. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7 AM-4 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eric Rosen can be reached at 571-270-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD MORAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 09, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588976
DENTAL APPLIANCE REINFORCEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588980
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE WITH SNAP FITTED, NON-SLIDING ARCHWIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588979
ACTIVE SELF-LIGATING ORTHODONTIC BRACKET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12564477
DENTAL WEDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12551317
DENTAL HANDPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+60.4%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 633 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month