Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/768,617

Wheat Variety T16Y871

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 10, 2024
Examiner
RADOSAVLJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR
Art Unit
1662
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
21st century genetics Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
87 granted / 106 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
131
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§103
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 106 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending and examined herein. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: on page 56 (¶00251) the specification lists the accession number under which the wheat cultivar T16Y871 is deposited as “_______” and gives the date of the deposit as “_______”. The deposit accession number and the date need to be specified. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claims 1, 9 and 11 are objected to because of the following informalities: the claims recite that representative seed of the wheat cultivar T16Y871 is deposited under ATCC Accession No.________. These deposit accession numbers are not complete and cannot be used to access the deposited seeds. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 9 and 11 are indefinite in their recitation of “wheat cultivar T16Y871” because the corresponding deposit number is absent from the claims. Common designations of plant varieties can change over time and the term “wheat cultivar T16Y871” is not otherwise known in the art. Thus, the metes and bounds of claims 1, 9 and 11 are unclear. Claims 6 and 17 are indefinite in their recitation of “wheat cultivar T16Y871”. Without the deposit number in the independent claims, it is unclear what soybean is being referred to. Common designations of plant varieties can change over time and the term “wheat cultivar T16Y871” is not otherwise known in the art. Thus, the metes and bounds of claims 6 and 17 are unclear. Claims 1, 9 and 11 are indefinite because of the presence of a blank line instead of an ATCC Accession No. Because the number is not present, it is unclear to which deposit the claims refer. Claims 2-5, 7-8, 10, 12-16 and 18-20 depend directly or indirectly from the rejected claims above and, as they fail to clarify the metes and bounds of the claims from which the depend, are rejected on the same ground. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Enablement Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. The claims are directed to novel wheat cultivar T16Y871. Since the plant is essential to the claimed invention, it must be obtainable by a repeatable method set forth in the specification or otherwise be readily available to the public. The specification does not disclose a repeatable process to obtain the exact same plant in each occurrence and it is not apparent if such a plant is readily available to the public. If a plant is not so obtainable or available, a deposit thereof may satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112. So long as the number of seeds deposited complies with the requirements of the IDA where the deposit is made, the USPTO considers such a compliant submission as satisfying the rules under 37 CFR 1.801 through 1.809. It is noted that Applicant intends to deposit seeds for T16Y871 at the ATCC, but there is no indication that the seeds have been deposited (¶0251). Further, there is no affirmative statement in the specification that all restrictions upon availability to the public will be irrevocably removed upon granting of the patent. If the deposit of these seeds is made and accepted under the terms of the Budapest Treaty, then an affidavit or declaration by the Applicant, or a statement by an attorney of record over his or her signature and registration number, stating that the seeds will be irrevocably and without restriction or condition released to the public upon the issuance of a patent would satisfy the deposit requirement made herein. If the deposit has not been made and accepted under the Budapest Treaty, then in order to certify that the deposit, meets the requirements set forth in 37 CFR 1.801-1.809, Applicant may provide assurance of compliance by an affidavit or declaration, or by a statement by an attorney of record over his or her signature and registration number showing that (a) during the pendency of the application, access to the invention will be afforded to the Commissioner upon request; (b) all restrictions upon availability to the public will be irrevocably removed upon granting of the patent; (c) the deposit will be maintained in a public depository for a period of 30 years or 5 years after the last request or for the enforceable life of the patent, whichever is longer; and (d) the viability of the biological material at the time of deposit will be tested (see 37 CFR 1.807). In addition, the identifying information set forth in 37 CFR 1.809(d) should be added to the specification. See 37 CFR 1.801 - 1.809 [MPEP 2401-2411.05] for additional explanation of these requirements. Subject Matter Free of the Prior Art Claims 1-20 appear to be free of the prior art. The closest prior art is Baker et al (US Patent No.: 11,272,676 B2; 15 March 2022). Baker et al teaches wheat variety M14C1030. Wheat variety M14C1030 is a hard red spring wheat that shares many trait characteristics with the instant variety, such as a white coleoptile, yellow anthers, twisted flag leaf, presence of waxy bloom on the flag leaf and stem, awned heads, and acuminate glume beaks. However, wheat variety M14C1030 and the instant variety have different parental genetics and differ in many other traits such as the orientation of the flag leaf at boot stage, heading days, plant height, head shape and curvature, awn coloration, glume color, and seed weight. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEKSANDAR RADOSAVLJEVIC whose telephone number is (571)272-8330. The examiner can normally be reached Monday--Friday 8-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bratislav Stankovic can be reached at 571-270-0305. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEKSANDAR RADOSAVLJEVIC/ Examiner, Art Unit 1662 /BRENT T PAGE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 18, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600977
PLANTS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING 2-PYRONE-4, 6-DICARBOXYLIC ACID (PDC)
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599079
PLANTS AND SEEDS OF HYBRID CORN VARIETY CH010446
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599088
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 24180206
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599103
Tomato Hybrid SVTM9041 and Parents Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588681
COMPOSITIONS, KITS AND METHODS FOR WEED CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 106 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month