Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/769,066

DYNAMIC AUTOMATIC GAIN CONTROL BASED ON TRANSMIT POWER FOR FREQUENCY BANDS WITH SMALL DUPLEX SEPARATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 10, 2024
Examiner
WHITAKER, JUSTIN MICHAEL
Art Unit
2415
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
13 granted / 19 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
64
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
75.6%
+35.6% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 19 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/14/2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 19, and 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Sung (Pub.: No.: US 10085223 B1, hereafter “Sung”). Regarding Claim 1, Claim 19, and Claim 24 Sung teaches an apparatus, method, and medium comprising An apparatus configured for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE) (Sung Fig. 1: 100), comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the UE to (Sung Fig. 1: 120, User Data Circuitry; Sung teaches an equipment with the means to process signals, see Fig. 1): transmit (Sung Fig. 1: 101) a first signal (Sung Fig. 1: 101, transmit data signal) at a transmit power (Sung Fig. 2: 204, transmit data signal 101) in via a first frequency band (Sung col. 3 lines 26-35, data signal; Sung teaches transmitting a data signal with an energy level, see Fig. 1, Fig. 2, and col. 3 lines 26-35); receive (Sung Fig. 2: 201) a second signal (Sung Fig. 2: 201, data signal) in via a second frequency band (Sung col. 3 lines 36-41, data signal, Examiner’s Note, the second frequency band is not explicitly distinct from the first frequency band; Sung teaches receiving the data signal, see Fig. 2 and col. 3 lines 26-35); and modify (Sung Fig. 2: 203) an analog gain (Sung Fig. 2: 203, apply ACG) applied to the second signal (Sung Fig. 2: 204) based on the transmit power (Sung Fig. 2 shows a loop wherein a signal is generated, 204, and then an ACG is applied, 203, following a check, 206, for the same data signal 101 for a Wireless Repeater System, see Fig. 1: 100; Sung teaches generating a feedback loop for the ACG by using the outputting data signal, see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 21-23, and 25-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sung (Pub.: No.: US 10085223 B1, hereafter “Sung”) in view of Ashworth (Pub. No.: US 20200383075 A1, hereafter “Ashworth”). Regarding Claim 2, Claim 22, and Claim 25 Sung teaches an apparatus, method, and medium as explained above in Claim 1. Sung does not explicitly teach determine a frequency separation between the first frequency band and the second frequency band; and modify the analog gain in response to the frequency separation being determined. However, Ashworth teaches determine a frequency separation (Ashworth Fig. 4: 412, B1/B2 demultiplexer) between the first frequency band (Ashworth ¶0056: B1) and the second frequency band (Ashworth ¶0056: B2; Ashworth teaches a demultiplexer for two frequency bands, see Fig. 4 and ¶0056); and modify (Ashworth ¶0056: amplified and filtered in accordance with the type of amplifiers) the analog gain (Ashworth Fig. 4: A07, A08, A09, A10, A11, and A12) in response to the frequency separation being determined (Ashworth Fig. 4: 412 is before amplifiers A07-A12; Ashworth teaches amplifying the then-separated bandwidths, see Fig. 4 and ¶0056). It would have been obvious for one skilled in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Sung by way of Ashworth, to include an element that teaches a demultiplexer for two frequency bands and amplifying the then-separated bandwidths, as taught by Ashworth in Fig. 4 and ¶0056, to improve a repeater device in wireless communication by amplifying a downlink signal to then re-transmit, while also reducing noise by demultiplex multiple frequency bands and amplify the individual, goal orientated signal for amplification to be supplemented into and reduce the associated noise multiplication and improve the known result with a known process. Regarding Claim 21, Claim 23, and Claim 26 Sung teaches an apparatus, method, and medium as explained above in Claim 1. Ashworth teaches wherein the first frequency band (Ashworth ¶0056: B1) and the second frequency band (Ashworth ¶0056: B2) form a frequency division duplex (FDD) pair (Ashworth ¶0055: multiband bi-directional FDD pair; Ashworth teaches the bandwidths being an FDD pair, see ¶0055 and ¶0056). It would have been obvious for one skilled in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Sung by way of Ashworth, to include an element that teaches the bandwidths being an FDD pair, as taught by Ashworth in ¶0055-¶0056, to improve a repeater device in wireless communication by amplifying a downlink signal to then re-transmit, while also reducing noise by demultiplex multiple frequency bands and amplify the individual, goal orientated signal for amplification to be supplemented into and reduce the associated noise multiplication and improve the known result with a known process. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN MICHAEL WHITAKER whose telephone number is (703)756-4763. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Rutkowski can be reached on (571) 270-1215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN MICHAEL WHITAKER/Examiner, Art Unit 2415 /Sudesh M. Patidar/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2415
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12712802
EQUAL-COST MULTI-PATH (ECMP) ROUTING WITH RESILIENCY AND CONSISTENT ORDERING
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706686
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING MODULATION AND CODING SCHEME MCS INDICATION INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12563457
CELL RESELECTION
3y 4m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562856
INTER PANEL RECEPTION AT UE
3y 1m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563597
BLOCK ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LATENCY SENSITIVE TRAFFIC STREAM
3y 1m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.8%)
3y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 19 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month