Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/769,144

ELECTRONIC LOCK SYSTEMS FOR BI-SWING DOORS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 10, 2024
Examiner
SIDKY, YAHYA I
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
152 granted / 198 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
238
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 198 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-11 and 13-20 in the reply filed on 10/20/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 8, 11, 13-15, and 17-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20020135188 to Chang. Regarding claim 1, Chang discloses: An electronic lock system (fig 1) for a door (7) comprising: a frame (71); and an electronic lock mechanism (fig 3) operatively mounted to the frame (fig 5), the electronic lock mechanism including: an arm (61) configured to move between a door lock position (fig 4) and a door release position (fig 3), the arm engaging a door (7) to restrict the door from moving in the door lock position, and the arm being spaced from the door (fig 3) to allow the door to move in the door release position; and a linear actuator (30) disposed proximate to the arm (fig 3), the linear actuator configured to move between a system lock position (fig 4) and a system release position (fig 3), the linear actuator presses against the arm (via 51) to move the arm to the door release position when the linear actuator is in the system release position (movement between figs 3 and 4). Regarding claim 2, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 1, wherein: the electronic lock system further comprises a catch (5) disposed proximate to the arm (fig 3); the catch is configured to move between an arm lock position (fig 4) and an arm release position (fig 3); the catch engages the arm (via 51) to restrict the arm from moving in the arm lock position; the catch is spaced from the arm to allow the arm to move in the arm release position (5 does not occupy passage 651 to allow 61 to move); the linear actuator restricts the catch in the arm lock position by engaging the catch in the system lock position (fig 4), and the linear actuator allows the catch to move to the arm release position by being spaced from the catch in the system lock position (fig 3). Regarding claim 3, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 2, wherein the linear actuator is biased towards the system lock position and moves to the system release position when selectively energized (via 33 when 44 is not present, see end of paragraph 0019). Regarding claim 4, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 3, wherein the linear actuator is configured to pull the arm from the arm release position to the arm lock position (via 51) when the linear actuator moves between the system release position to the system lock position (see movement between figs 3 and 4). Regarding claim 8, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 2, wherein the catch engages the arm in the arm lock position when the arm is in the door lock position (fig 4). Regarding claim 11, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 2, wherein the catch is biased towards the arm release position (via 44). Regarding claim 17, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 2, wherein the catch is pivotally mounted to the frame (see figs 3 and 4). Regarding claim 18, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 17, wherein the catch includes: a catch bearing shaft (41) mounted to the frame; and a catch body (5) having a first end (bottom end as seen in fig 4) and a second end (top end seen in fig 4) opposite the first end, the catch body defining: a catch bearing port (52) proximate the first end and complementarily configured with the catch bearing shaft to receive the catch bearing shaft (fig 4); and a notch (511) proximate the second end and complementarily configured with the arm to engage and restrict movement of the arm when the catch is in the arm lock position (fig 4). Regarding claim 19, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 18, wherein the linear actuator engages the catch body between the bearing port and the second end (30 engages 5 and 53, which is between 52 and 511, when engaging 5 to move it). Regarding claim 1, Chang discloses (NOTE: this is a different interpretation of claim 1): An electronic lock system (fig 1) for a door (7) comprising: a frame (71); and an electronic lock mechanism (fig 3) operatively mounted to the frame (fig 5), the electronic lock mechanism including: an arm (5) configured to move between a door lock position (fig 4) and a door release position (fig 3), the arm engaging (via 61) a door (7) to restrict the door from moving in the door lock position, and the arm being spaced from the door (fig 3) to allow the door to move in the door release position; and a linear actuator (30) disposed proximate to the arm (fig 3), the linear actuator configured to move between a system lock position (fig 4) and a system release position (fig 3), the linear actuator presses against the arm (via 41) to move the arm to the door release position when the linear actuator is in the system release position (movement between figs 3 and 4). Regarding claim 13, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 1, wherein the arm is pivotally mounted to the frame (figs 3 and 4). Regarding claim 14, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 13, wherein: the electronic lock system further comprises a housing (20); the frame is supported in the housing (20 supports 71, see fig 5); the arm includes: a platform (51) pivotally mounted to the frame; and a doorstop (61) mounted to the platform; the doorstop extends beyond the housing to engage the door when the arm is in the door lock position (figs 4 and 5); and the doorstop retracts into the housing to be spaced from the door when the arm is in the door release position (fig 3). Regarding claim 15, Chang discloses: The electronic lock system of claim 14, wherein: the arm further includes an engagement member (41) operatively mounted to the platform (via 5) in a position proximate to the linear actuator (fig 3); and the linear actuator presses against the engagement member to pivot the arm to the door release position when the linear actuator is in the system release position (see figs 3 and 4) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-7, 9-10, 16, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Yahya Sidky whose telephone number is (571)272-6237. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Mills can be reached at (571) 272-8322. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Y.S./Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3675 /CHRISTINE M MILLS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601210
DOOR HANDLE SYSTEM FOR A SAFETY DOOR, ESPECIALLY FOR A SLIDING DOOR OR A SWING DOOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590480
COMPACT POWERED DOOR LATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577807
VERTICALLY ADJUSTABLE STRIKE PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577808
GATE LATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559991
MINIMALIST SECONDARY BARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+20.5%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month