Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/769,211

SHOE APPARATUS, ACCESSORY, ACCESSORY SHOE APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Jul 10, 2024
Priority
Apr 09, 2020 — JP 2020-070625 +4 more
Examiner
MAHONEY, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
904 granted / 1087 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1103
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1087 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 17/533815, filed on November 23, 2021. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. There is a lack of antecedent basis for “the same first position” recited in claim 1. There is a lack of antecedent basis for “the same first position” recited in claim 3. It is unclear what applicant means by “same first position” as recited in claims 1 and 3. For examination purposes it will be interpreted as either the same side or the same side in the X direction. For clarity, the examiner requests the applicant reference the surfaces in the drawings (i.e. 300f, 300c, 300k, etc.) when explaining where the first position is or which surface is being referenced/argued. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Takashima (JP2006079053). Takashima teaches a shoe apparatus comprising: a plurality of connection terminals (4802/4804), where a first direction (X direction, see annotated fig. 20) is an attachment direction to an accessory shoe apparatus included in an electronic apparatus, which are arranged in a second direction (Y direction, see annotated fig. 20) orthogonal to the first direction; and a connector that includes protrusion portions (58) that protrude in a third direction (Z direction, see annotated fig. 20) orthogonal to the first and second directions on both outer sides of the plurality of connection terminals in the second direction, wherein at the same first position in the third direction is a first position in each of the protrusion portions, a surface (surface A, A’, see annotated fig. 20) on a side far from the plurality of connection terminals in the second direction of the protrusion portion has a larger inclination with respect to the third direction than a surface (surface B, B’) on a side near to the plurality of connection terminals in the second direction of the protrusion portion. PNG media_image1.png 937 1695 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, fig. 19 teaches an accessory 200 comprising the shoe apparatus. Regarding claim 3, Takashima teaches an accessory shoe apparatus 100 attachable to and detachable from an accessory (200) in a first direction (X direction, see annotated fig. 15 below), the accessory shoe apparatus comprising: a plurality of connection terminals (1602/1604) arranged in a second direction (Y direction, see annotated fig. 15) orthogonal to the first direction; and a holding member (10) configured to hold the plurality of connection terminals, wherein the holding member includes groove portions (24) on both outer sides of the plurality of connection terminals in the second direction, and wherein at the same first position in a third direction (Z direction) orthogonal to the first and second directions is a first position in each of the groove portions, a surface (C, C’ see annotated fig. 15) facing an inside in the second direction of the groove portion has a larger inclination with respect to the third direction than a surface facing an outer side (D,D’, see annotated fig. 15) in the second direction of the groove portion. Regarding claim 4, fig. 14 teaches an electronic apparatus comprising the accessory shoe apparatus. PNG media_image2.png 623 833 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, figs. 6 and 20 teach a shoe apparatus attachable to and detachable from the accessory shoe apparatus. Regarding claim 6, fig. 19 teaches an accessory (200) comprising the shoe apparatus. Regarding claim 7, annotated fig. 20 shows that the surface (B, B’) on the side near to the plurality of connection terminals in the second direction of the protrusion portion is substantially parallel to the third (Z) direction. Regarding claim 8, fig. 19 shows an accessory 200 comprising the shoe apparatus. Regarding claims 9-10, on page 4, paragraph 2, teaches that the accessory is an illumination apparatus. “In many cases, an imaging device (hereinafter referred to as an electronic device) such as a digital camera or a video camera is equipped with an accessory for attaching accessory devices such as a flashlight for emitting auxiliary light or a microphone for recording sound. Is provided.” Regarding claim 11, annotated fig. 15 shows that the surface (D, D’) facing the outer side in the second direction (Y) of the groove portion is substantially parallel to the third direction (Z). Regarding claim 12, fig. 14 teaches an electronic apparatus comprising the accessory shoe apparatus. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-20 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed June 6, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that Takashima does not teach at the same first position in the third direction, a side far from the plurality of connection terminals in the second direction of the protrusion portion has a larger inclination with respect to the third direction than a surface on a side near to the plurality of connection terminals in the second direction of the protrusion portion. The examiner respectfully disagrees. The same first position is interpreted as either the left side or the right side. For example either surfaces A and B in annotated fig. 20 are at the same first position or surfaces A’ and B’ in in annotated fig. 20 are at the same first position. Not A and B’ are not at the same first position. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E MAHONEY whose telephone number is (571)272-2122. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at 571-272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER E MAHONEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jun 16, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696032
IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS HAVING MICROPHONES
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12681538
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING FLEXIBLE DISPLAY AND METHOD FOR DETECTING STATE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680857
FIELD DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677805
IMAGE ACQUISITION SYSTEM FOR HEALTH EVALUATION OF LACTATING COW TEAT
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658460
PERFORMANCE TESTING DEVICE APPLICABLE TO METAL FUEL CELL
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.6%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1087 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month