Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/769,824

RETRACTABLE MULTI-SHAPED SCALE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Priority
May 08, 2024 — TW 113117089
Examiner
SADATE-MOUALEU, MIREILLE SANDRA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Easton Precision Industries Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
40 granted / 44 resolved
+30.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
51
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
82.6%
+42.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 44 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 1, the limitation "the weight" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding Claim 2, the limitation "the inner space" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding Claim 2, the limitation “slightly larger” in lines 2 and 5. The term “slightly” is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “slightly” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claims 3-10 are rejected by virtue of their dependence upon a rejected base claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the closest prior art Hulburt et al (US 7022920 B2) discloses collapsible scale with a support structure having a first support member and a second support member connected to the first support member between a collapsed position and an extended position. A plurality of platform segments on the support structure. A load sensing apparatus is mounted to the support structure and is adapted to provide an output signal of the full weight of an associated object. Chen et al (US 20040227331 A1) discloses a multi-functional wheelchair which comprising a seat with which can move transversally with a back cushion, two armrests at two sides of the seat, and two front wheels and two rear wheels below the seat. The height of the upper frame is adjustable by a push-and-brake device and the supporting frame. Another push-and-brake device is installed between the chair back and the footrest so that the chair back and the footrest can interact with one another. The prior art alone or in combination fails to explicitly disclose a retractable multi-shaped scale, including a retractable part, the retractable part includes a fixed platform, two opposite sides of the fixed platform are respectively provided with a first rail and a second rail; a first retractable platform, the first retractable platform can accommodate the fixed platform, and can slide along the first rail; a second retractable platform, the second retractable platform can accommodate the first retractable platform, and can slide toward the opposite side of the first retractable platform along the second rail; a support part, for supporting the retractable part and transmitting the weight, the support part includes a plurality of support frames and a cross bar, two ends of the cross bar are connected to a set of corresponding support frames, one end of the support frames is pivotally connected to the bottom of the fixed platform; a base, located at the lower part of the scale, the other end of the support frames is pivotally connected to the base, and the base includes at least one weight sensor for obtaining the measurement results; a telescopic rod, one end is pivotally connected to the base, and the other end is pivotally connected to the cross bar, the telescopic rod is used to drive the support frames from horizontal to vertical, and to change the distance between the base and the retractable part; and an operation panel, the operation panel is connected to the weight sensor to display the measurement results of the weight sensor. The remaining claims are allowable due to their dependency. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MIREILLE SANDRA SADATE-MOUALEU whose telephone number is (571)272-2862. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 0730-1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571-272-2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MIREILLE S SADATE-MOUALEU/ Examiner, Art Unit 2855 /PETER J MACCHIAROLO/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680887
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD OF ESTIMATING RATE OF CORE BODY TEMPERATURE CHANGE USING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667084
SYSTEM FOR EARLY DETECTION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN POULTRY
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663313
SENSOR BRIDGE ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661306
PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION FACILITY COMPRISING A MEASURING DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12650394
SMALL VOLUME SYSTEM AND METHODS OF EVALUATING THE STABILITY OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 12m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 44 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month