Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/770,035

RECEPTION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Examiner
PHAN, THO GIA
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
930 granted / 1017 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1045
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1017 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by the publication of JP 2019176692 A. Regarding claim 1, the publication of JP 2019176692 A discloses a plurality of reception electrodes 200,250 arranged at positions opposing one transmission line of a transmission apparatus 110; and a connection path (wiring connection path between 200,250) configured to connect the plurality of reception electrodes, wherein the connection path includes at least one passive element (wiring connection path between 200,250) between the reception electrodes (fig16). The publication of JP 2019176692 A also discloses the plurality of reception electrodes is arranged on a dielectric substrate (fig16). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over the publication of JP 2019176692 A. The publication of JP 2019176692 A had been discussed but fails to teach the plurality of reception electrodes arranged at positions opposing the one transmission line is three or more reception electrodes and at least one passive element includes a resistor or an inductor or a ferrite bead. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was made to have three or more reception electrodes and the at least one passive element includes a resistor or an inductor or a ferrite bead, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known elements for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3 and 6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The patents to Goma, Takahashi, Eguchi, Ichikawa, Shigihara and Nakatsuka are cited as of interested and illustrated a similar structure to a reception apparatus. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THO GIA PHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1826. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F (8-430). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dimary Lopez can be reached on (571) 270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /THO G PHAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603438
QUASI-HELICAL ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603437
ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597703
VEHICULAR ANTENNA DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595380
RFID SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592495
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MITIGATING INTERFERENCE FROM SATELLITE GATEWAY ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+4.7%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1017 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month