Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/770,451

POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Examiner
KESSIE, DANIEL
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
418 granted / 685 resolved
-7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
75 currently pending
Career history
760
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 685 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 2019/0356176). Re Claims 1, 4; Lee discloses a power receiving apparatus (450) comprising: At least one memory (456) At least one processor configured to communicate with the at least one memory (452) Wherein the at lest one processor is configured to cause the receiving apparatus to act as a power receiving unit (451L) configured to wirelessly receive power from a power transmission apparatus (400); a communication unit (453) configured to: transmit, to the power transmission apparatus, (Fig. 4) a first packet for requesting; (701, Fig. 7) including information execution of foreign object detection (Par 0113) receive, from the power transmission apparatus, a second packet in response to the transmitted packet; (703, Fig. 7) transmit, to the power transmission apparatus, based on a foreign object detection with a first interval or a second interval a third packet indicating on a received power value after the second packet is received (725 Fig. 7); receive, from the power transmission apparatus, a fourth packet in response to the transmitted third packet; (727, Fig. 7) and wherein the first interval is shorter than the second interval. (When no foreign object is present, the transition to the first mode is faster than when one is present, because the authentication of the detected object takes time.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Park (US 2021/0351631) Re Claim 2 and 5; Lee discloses wherein the second packet. Lee does not disclose includes information on version information. However, Park discloses a Packet includes information on version information (Par 0117). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing of the invention to have identify the version information, in order to regulate the power between the transmitter and the receiver to provide adequate power to the receiver. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/20/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Lee does not disclose transmit, to the power transmission apparatus, a first packet including information on execution of foreign object detection. However, the Examiner respectfully disagree, Lee discloses that as indicated above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL KESSIE whose telephone number is (571)272-4449. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pmEst. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL KESSIE/ 11/22/2025 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 20, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603518
REDUNDANT POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597794
Battery Charging Method, Electronic Apparatus, Storage Medium, and Program Product
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597797
POWER FEEDING DEVICE, POWER FEEDING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587026
DYNAMICALLY SELECTABLE POWER AND CHARGING CONFIGURATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587043
POWER FEED SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+25.0%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 685 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month