Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/770,497

LOGICAL CHANNEL PRIORITIZATION PROCEDURE FOR SIDELINK LOGICAL CHANNELS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Priority
Jan 30, 2015 — EU 15153298.3 +6 more
Examiner
ZAIDI, IQBAL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1101 granted / 1218 resolved
+30.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1253
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
CTNF 18/770,497 CTNF 85728 DETAILED ACTION The instant application having application No 18/770,497 filed on 07/11/2024 is presented for examination by the examiner. Oath/Declaration The applicant’s oath/declaration has been reviewed by the examiner and is found to conform to the requirements prescribed in 37 C.F.R 1.63. Double Patenting 08-33 AIA The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg , 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman , 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi , 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum , 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel , 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington , 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 1-14 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-13 of Patent Application No. 18296857 (hereafter Patent Application). Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both claims are based on controls transmission of the sidelink data using the allocated radio resources and vice versa. For claim 1, Patent Application discloses a wireless communication system including user equipments operable in the wireless communications system supporting direct communication the user equipments, the user equipments including a user equipment comprising circuitry, which, in operation selects a sidelink destination group (ProSe destination) associated with a sidelink logical channel having a highest logical channel priority among sidelink logical channels, which have data available for transmission in a sidelink control period (SC period) and which have not previously been selected in the same sidelink control period, wherein each of the sidelink logical channels belongs to a sidelink destination group, each of the sidelink logical channels is allocated to a logical channel group (LCG) depending on a priority of said each sidelink logical channel and on a priority of the logical channel group, and the logical channel group is defined per sidelink destination group; and allocates radio resources to sidelink logical channels belonging to the selected sidelink destination group in decreasing priority order; and a transmitter, which, in operation, transmits the data using the allocated radio resources (See Claim 1) . For claim 2, Patent Application discloses the logical channel priority depends on at least one factor chosen from a destination group priority associated with the sidelink destination group; a logical channel group priority associated with a group of logical channels, grouped according to a data type; a geographical location of the user equipment; an emergency level in which the user equipment is operating; and a user equipment identifier (See Claim 2) . For claim 3, Patent Application discloses further comprising a receiver, which, in operation, receives an indication of logical channel priorities of the respective logical channels determined by a ProSe (proximity services) function in a ProSe entity of the wireless communications system, and stores the logical priorities (See Claim 3) . For claim 4, Patent Application discloses the circuitry, in operation, determines a logical channel priority of a logical channel (See Claim 4) . For claim 5, Patent Application discloses further comprising a buffer, which, in operation, stores data to be transmitted for a logical channel; wherein, the circuitry, in operation, modifies a current priority of said logical channel into a modified priority either based on own recalculation of the priority or based on a command received from a ProSe function (See Claim 5) . For claim 6, Patent Application discloses the data stored in the buffer before modification are either flushed or transmitted with the current priority depending on at least one factor chosen from a comparative determination of whether the current priority is higher than the modified priority; a level of the modified priority; and a cause of the modification (See Claim 6) . For claim 7, Patent Application discloses the circuitry, in operation determines that the user equipment is selected or not selected to transmit data among the user equipments of the wireless communications system; responsive to determining that the user equipment is not selected, suspends sidelink logical channels associated with the user equipment and does not select or allocate resources to the suspended sidelink logical channels; and responsive to determining that the user equipment is selected, resumes the sidelink logical channels which were previously suspended (See Claim 7) . For claim 8, Patent Application discloses the circuitry, in operation: determines that the user equipment is not to transmit data, according to messages exchanged in the wireless communications system between the user equipments and/or a proximity service entity in a layer above MAC (medium access control), and responsive to determining that the user equipment is not to transmit data, stops transmission of data and/or sidelink control information (See Claim 8) . For claim 9, Patent Application discloses the circuitry, in operation extracts, from sidelink control information on physical layer or a MAC (medium access control) PDU (protocol data unit), received from another user equipment, a user equipment priority indicator; compares the extracted user equipment priority indicator with the user equipment's own user equipment priority stored in the user equipment or a priority of the data to be transmitted; and responsive to the user equipment's own user equipment priority being lower than the extracted user equipment priority indicator, determines that the user equipment is not selected to transmit data (See Claim 9) . For claim 10, Patent Application discloses responsive to the user equipment having a floor and receiving sidelink control information from another user equipment with a higher user equipment priority, the circuitry stops transmission of the data via the transmitter (See Claim 10) . For claim 11, Patent Application discloses the user equipment priority indicator is carried within a MAC header of the MAC PDU and is configured by a ProSe (proximity services) entity of the wireless communications system (See Claim 11) . For claim 12, Patent Application discloses the circuitry, in operation, reports to a network node of the wireless communications system a status of a buffer associated with a logical channel priority (See Claim 12) . For claim 13, Patent Application discloses the circuitry, in operation, selects the radio resources to be allocated from a resource pool, and selects the resource pool among a plurality of resource pools according to a priority associated with the selected sidelink destination group or a logical channel priority associated with a logical channel from which the data is to be transmitted (See Claim 13) . For claim 14, Patent Application discloses a method performed by a wireless communication system including user equipments operable in the wireless communications system supporting direct communication between the user equipments, the method comprising selecting, by a user equipment of the user equipments, a sidelink destination group (ProSe destination) associated with a sidelink logical channel having a highest logical channel priority among sidelink logical channels, which have data available for transmission in a sidelink control period (SC period) and have not previously been selected in the same sidelink control period, wherein each of the sidelink logical channels belongs to a sidelink destination group, each of the sidelink logical channels is allocated to a logical channel group (LCG) depending on a priority of said each sidelink logical channel and on a priority of the logical channel group, and the logical channel group is defined per sidelink destination group; allocating, by the user equipment, radio resources to sidelink logical channels belonging to the selected sidelink destination group in decreasing priority order; and transmitting, by the user equipment, the data using the allocated radio resources (See Claim 1) . Conclusion 07-96 AIA The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure are: CHAE et al. (US 20180139794, May 17, 2018) teaches METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING RELAY BY DEVICE-TO-DEVICE COMMUNICATION TERMINAL AND TRANSMITTING OR RECEIVING SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IQBAL ZAIDI whose telephone number is (571)270-39433943. The examiner can normally be reached on M to Thu 8.a.m to 6.p.m.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NGO RICKY can be reached on 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /IQBAL ZAIDI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464 Application/Control Number: 18/770,497 Page 2 Art Unit: 2464 Application/Control Number: 18/770,497 Page 3 Art Unit: 2464 Application/Control Number: 18/770,497 Page 4 Art Unit: 2464 Application/Control Number: 18/770,497 Page 5 Art Unit: 2464 Application/Control Number: 18/770,497 Page 6 Art Unit: 2464 Application/Control Number: 18/770,497 Page 7 Art Unit: 2464 Application/Control Number: 18/770,497 Page 8 Art Unit: 2464 Application/Control Number: 18/770,497 Page 9 Art Unit: 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684373
Testing wireless networks using over-the-air signals
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683739
ANTENNA-PORT-SPECIFIC REPETITION AND/OR POWER CONTROL
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676805
NETWORK REACHABILITY VERIFICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671508
DIGITAL TWIN AND A METHOD FOR MODELLING CONNECTIVITY OF A HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659770
METHODS TO ENHANCE SECONDARY COMPONENT CARRIER (SCC) AND DUAL CONNECTIVITY (DC) PERFORMANCE IN LTE AND NEW RADIO (NR) CELLULAR NETWORKS
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 3m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month