Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 28, 2026
Application No. 18/770,696

CURRENT DETECTION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 12, 2024
Priority
Jul 13, 2023 — JP 2023-115540 +1 more
Examiner
MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Asahi Kasei Microdevices Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
829 granted / 966 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
986
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
86.4%
+46.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 966 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) & (a)(2) as being anticipated by Nakayama et al (U.S. PGPub # 2017/0003323). or (U.S. PGPub # 2017/0082659). Regarding Independent claim 1, Nakayama teaches: A current detection device, comprising at least two bus bars (Fig. 2 Elements 2-4. See paragraphs 0038-0046.) each of which includes a magnetic detection element (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), a first current path having a larger cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and a second current path having a smaller cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), the first current path and the second current path sandwiching the magnetic detection element ( See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), wherein the at least two bus bars are arranged such that the first current paths face each other ( See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image1.png 532 582 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches another bus bar that is arranged between the at least two bus bars (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and includes a magnetic detection element (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), a third current path having a larger cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and a fourth current path having a smaller cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), the third current path and the fourth current path sandwiching the magnetic detection element (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image2.png 585 810 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Nakayama teaches: A current detection device, comprising at least two bus bars (Fig. 2 Elements 2-4. See paragraphs 0038-0046.) each of which includes a magnetic detection element (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), a first current path having a larger cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and a second current path having a smaller cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), the first current path and the second current path sandwiching the magnetic detection element (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and further comprising another bus bar that is arranged between the at least two bus bars (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and includes a magnetic detection element (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), a third current path having a larger cross-sectional area (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and a fourth current path having a smaller cross-sectional area (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), the third current path and the fourth current path sandwiching the magnetic detection element (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image3.png 585 810 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 3, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the another bus bar is arranged such that a distance between the fourth current path of the another bus bar and one of the at least two bus bars facing the fourth current path is greater than a distance between the third current path of the another bus bar and another of the at least two bus bars facing the third current path (One can arbitrarily draw a line between the busbars shown that meets this claim limitation. See amended figure 2 below.). PNG media_image4.png 460 618 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 4, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the at least two bus bars are arranged such that the first current paths face each other (One can arbitrarily draw a line between the busbars shown that meets this claim limitation. See amended figure 2 below.). PNG media_image5.png 491 618 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 3, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the another bus bar is arranged such that a distance between the third current path of the another bus bar and one of the at least two bus bars facing the third current path is greater than a distance between the fourth current path of the another bus bar and another of the at least two bus bars facing the fourth current path (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image6.png 460 618 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 6, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the at least two bus bars are arranged such that the second current paths face each other (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). Regarding claim 8, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the first current path and the second current path have a same thickness and different widths (See Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below with the various dimensions of the busbars. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image7.png 460 618 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the first current path and the second current path have a same thickness and different widths (See Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). Regarding claim 10, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the bus bar includes two main body portions to which the first current path and the second current path are coupled, and the first current path and the second current path are respectively disposed closer to an inner side than an outer edge of the two main body portions in a direction in which the first current path and the second current path are arranged side by side (See Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image7.png 460 618 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 11, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 10, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches each of the two main body portions includes a slit to which a substrate that supports the magnetic detection element is inserted (See Fig. 2 Elements 2a, 3a, & 4a below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image7.png 460 618 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 12, Nakayama teaches: A current detection device, comprising at least two bus bars (Fig. 2 Elements 2-4. See paragraphs 0038-0046.) each of which includes a magnetic detection element (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), a first current path having a larger cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and a second current path having a smaller cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), wherein the at least two bus bars are arranged such that the first current paths face each other (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image1.png 532 582 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 13, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 12, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches another bus bar that is arranged between the at least two bus bars (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and includes a magnetic detection element (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), a third current path having a larger cross-sectional area See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and a fourth current path having a smaller cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image8.png 585 810 media_image8.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, Nakayama teaches: A current detection device, comprising at least two bus bars (Fig. 2 Elements 2-4. See paragraphs 0038-0046.) each of which includes a magnetic detection element (Fig. 2 Elements 6a-6c. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), a first current path having a larger cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and a second current path having a smaller cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and further comprising another bus bar that is arranged between the at least two bus bars (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and includes a magnetic detection element, a third current path having a larger cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.), and a fourth current path having a smaller cross-sectional area (See Examiner amended Fig. 2 Elements 2-4 below. See paragraphs 0038-0046.). PNG media_image9.png 585 810 media_image9.png Greyscale Regarding claim 15, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 14, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the another bus bar is arranged such that a distance between the fourth current path of the another bus bar and one of the at least two bus bars facing the fourth current path is greater than a distance between the third current path of the another bus bar and another of the at least two bus bars facing the third current path (One can arbitrarily draw a line between the busbars shown that meets this claim limitation. See amended figure 2 below.). PNG media_image4.png 460 618 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 16, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 14, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the at least two bus bars are arranged such that the first current paths face each other (All current paths face each other in some form in the figures cited.). Regarding claim 17, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 14, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the another bus bar is arranged such that a distance between the third current path of the another bus bar and one of the at least two bus bars facing the third current path is greater than a distance between the fourth current path of the another bus bar and another of the at least two bus bars facing the fourth current path (One can arbitrarily draw a line between the busbars shown that meets this claim limitation. See amended figure 2 below.). PNG media_image6.png 460 618 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding claim 18, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 17, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches the at least two bus bars are arranged such that the second current paths face each other (All current paths face each other in some form in the figures cited.). Regarding claim 19, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 12, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches in the at least two bus bars, the magnetic detection element is arranged so as to overlap with the second current path in a top view (See Fig. 2 wherein one can arbitrarily define a top view to meet that limitation.). Regarding claim 20, Nakayama teaches all elements of claim 12, upon which this claim depends. Nakayama teaches in the at least two bus bars, the magnetic detection element is arranged so as to overlap with a gap between the first current path and the second current path in a top view (See Fig. 2 wherein one can arbitrarily define a top view to meet that limitation.). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art listed but not cited represents the previous state of the art and analogous art that teaches some of the limitations claimed by applicant. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P MCANDREW whose telephone number is (469)295-9025. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lee Rodak can be reached on 571-270-5628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P MCANDREW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 15, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12625108
SENSOR ELEMENT FOR GAS SENSOR HAVING NANOROD STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND GAS SENSOR
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625168
CURRENT MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND CURRENT MEASUREMENT METHOD
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625206
DIGITIZING DEVICE AND DIGITIZING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618903
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR MEASURING ARC DURATION
2y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618662
MULTI-ROTATION ANGLE DETECTION DEVICE, AND SEGMENT COUNTER FOR SAME
1y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 966 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month