Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/770,887

DUAL-OUTPUT POWER CONVERTER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 12, 2024
Examiner
PEREZ, BRYAN REYNALDO
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
National Taiwan University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
595 granted / 712 resolved
+15.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
746
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 712 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This non-final office action is responsive to Applicants' application filed on 07/12/24. Claims 1-6 are presented for examination and are pending for the reasons indicated herein below. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bianco et al. (US 10425012 B2) in view of Liu (US 5363287 A) Regarding claim 1. Bia teaches a dual-output power converter, comprising: an input voltage [122]; a first N-channel power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor switch being electrically connected to said input voltage [128]; a second N-channel power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor switch being electrically connected to said input voltage [126], and being electrically connected to said first N-channel power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor switch; a resonant inductor [130] being electrically connected to the first N-channel power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor switch and being electrically connected to said second N-channel power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor switch; a transformer [134] primary-side magnetizing inductor being electrically connected to said resonant inductor; a transformer primary-side coil [158] being electrically connected to said resonant inductor, and being electrically connected to said transformer primary-side magnetizing inductor; a resonant capacitor [148] being electrically connected to said input voltage, being electrically connected to said second N-channel power metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor switch, and being electrically connected to said transformer primary-side magnetizing inductor and said transformer primary-side coil, wherein said resonant capacitor having a resonant voltage [resonance given by LLC circuit]. However, Bia does not explicitly mention a circuit comprising: a first output resistor being electrically connected to a transformer first secondary-side coil, being electrically connected to a first diode, and being electrically connected to a first output capacitor, said first output resistor having a first output voltage, said first diode being electrically connected to said first output capacitor, and said transformer first secondary-side coil being electrically connected to said first output capacitor; and a second output resistor being electrically connected to a transformer second secondary-side coil, being electrically connected to a second diode, and being electrically connected to a second output capacitor, wherein said second output resistor having a second output voltage, said second diode being electrically connected to said second output capacitor, and said transformer second secondary-side coil is electrically connected to said second output capacitor. Liu teaches a circuit comprising: a first output resistor [fig 2, 50.1] being electrically connected to a transformer first secondary-side coil [14.1], being electrically connected to a first diode [50.1], and being electrically connected to a first output capacitor [48.1], said first output resistor having a first output voltage [i.e. Vo of 50.1], said first diode being electrically connected to said first output capacitor, and said transformer first secondary-side coil being electrically connected to said first output capacitor; and a second output resistor [50.m] being electrically connected to a transformer second secondary-side coil [14.m], being electrically connected to a second diode [42.m], and being electrically connected to a second output capacitor [48.m], wherein said second output resistor having a second output voltage [Vo of 50.m], said second diode being electrically connected to said second output capacitor, and said transformer second secondary-side coil is electrically connected to said second output capacitor. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the features of Liu in order to provide such a power supply having a low switching loss, low EMI noise, and at least one high voltage output rectifying circuit [col 1 lines 65-67]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, and if the claim objections stated above were overcome. Examiner Note The examiner cites particular columns and lines numbers in the references as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested that, in preparing responses, the applicant fully consider the references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Bryan Perez whose telephone number is (571)272-8837. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon.-Fri. (7:30 – 5:00). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Crystal Hammond, can be reached on (571) 270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /BRYAN R PEREZ/Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602070
VOLTAGE REFERENCE CIRCUIT AND A POWER MANAGEMENT UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597858
CONTROL OF A DC-DC CONVERTER TO SUPPLY A CONSTANT CURRENT TO A PULSED LOAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592643
POWER ADAPTER POWER DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592661
POWER CONVERSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580494
INVERTER, METHOD OF CONTROLLING INVERTER, PROGRAM OF CONTROLLING INVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 712 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month