Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/771,666

IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 12, 2024
Examiner
PAUL, DISLER
Art Unit
2695
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1186 granted / 1445 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1486
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1445 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 14, 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8, 10-12, 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beckhardt et al. (US 11,831,288 B2) and Hariharan et al. (US 11,259,192 B2). The prior art as in Beckhardt et al. disclose of an image display apparatus comprising: a display (fig.1C (110a); col.13 line 4-10/the playback device may be part of a television which inherently has such a display); an audio output device configured to output sound (fig.1C (114); col.13 line 10-12); a wireless communication device configured to exchange data with the external sound output device in a wireless manner; & an interface configured to exchange data with an external sound output device in a wired manner (fig.1C (112); col.11 line 15-35); and a signal processing device configured to: in a simultaneous sound output mode of the external sound output device and the audio output device and in a mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device, output a first audio signal to the audio output device, and wirelessly transmit a second audio signal based on a first format to the external sound output device (fig.1C (112); col.6 line 25-42; col.10 line 35-40) & according to communication, wirelessly transmit an audio signal based on a second format to the external sound output device (col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). Nonetheless, Beckhardt et al never specify that such formatted signal being transmit in response to a number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to a reference value. But it shall be observed Hariharan et al. disclose of the similar aspect concerning a certain signal being transmitted in response to a retransmission requests from the external sound output device (col.13 line 10-25). Thus, one of the ordinary skills in the art could have varied the transmission of signal as noted by adding such transmission as being the result of response to a retransmission requests from the external sound output device so as to provide a robust and accurate wireless transmission. Although, the art never limit such specific aspect regarding transmission in response to a number of retransmission requests being greater than or equal to a reference value, again one of the ordinary skills in the art could have varied the amount of request to be retransmitted by specifying such specific number of retransmission requests being greater than or equal to a reference value for achieving the same expected result as to ascertain a robust and accurate wireless transmission due to error in packet signal . 2. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein in response to the number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to the reference value, the signal processing device is configured to wirelessly transmit an audio signal, which is based on the second format with a wireless data transfer rate less than the first format, to the external sound output device (Beck-col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). 3. The image display apparatus of claim 2, wherein the signal processing device is configured to output an audio signal based on the first format to the audio output device while outputting the audio signal based on the second format (Beck-col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). 4. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein in the simultaneous sound output mode of the external sound output device and the audio output device and in the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device, the signal processing device is configured to output a first audio signal based on the first format to the audio output device, and wirelessly transmit a second audio signal based on the first format to the external sound output device, wherein in response to the number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to the reference value, the signal processing device is configured to output a third audio signal based on the second format to the audio output device, and wirelessly transmit a fourth audio signal based on the second format to the external sound output device (Beck-col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). 5. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein in a single sound output mode of the image display apparatus, the signal processing device is configured to output a fifth audio signal, and the audio output device is configured to output sound corresponding to the fifth audio signal (Beck-col.9 line 50-60/the audio from the source may be receive by the processing device to output to output device). 6. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein in a single sound output mode of the external sound output device and in the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device, the signal processing device is configured to wirelessly transmit an audio signal, which is based on a third format with a wireless data transfer rate greater than the first format, to the external sound output device (Beck-col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). 7. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein in the single sound output mode of the external sound output device and in the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device, the signal processing device is configured to wirelessly transmit the audio signal based on the first format to the external sound output device (Beck-col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). 8. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein in the single sound output mode of the external sound output device and in the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device, the signal processing device is configured to wirelessly transmit the audio signal based on the third format to the external sound output device, wherein in response to the number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to the reference value or a second reference value, the signal processing device is configured to wirelessly transmit an audio signal based on a fourth format to the external sound output device (Beck-col.27 line 40-58; col.36 line 1-10); . 10. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein in the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device, the signal processing device is configured to wirelessly transmit an audio signal, which is based on an audio format processable by the external sound output device, to the external sound output device (Beck-col.27 line 40-58). 11. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein the signal processing device is configured to: receive, from the external sound output device, audio format information processable by the external sound output device, and wirelessly transmit an audio signal based on an audio format, which is selected from the received audio format information based on an environment of wireless connection with the external sound output device, to the external sound output device (Beck-col.3 line 15-30 & col.27 line 40-58). 12. The image display apparatus of claim 11, wherein the interface is configured to receive, from the external sound output device, the audio format information processable by the external sound output device, and to transmit the received audio format information to the signal processing device (Beck-col.3 line 15-30 & col.27 line 40-58). 15. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein based on content received, the signal processing device is configured to change a format of an audio signal transmitted wirelessly to the external sound output device (Beck-col.3 line 15-30 & col.27 line 40-58). Nonetheless, the prior art never limit of the receive content to be displayed on the display, but one of the ordinary skills in the art could have modified the content to be received by specifying of displaying the content if desired for achieving the same expected result as to provide the desired wireless signal format in light of the computational capability of the device. Claim(s) 9, 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beckhardt et al. (US 11,831,288 B2) and Hariharan et al. (US 11,259,192 B2) and Du et al. (US 2018/0152778 A1). 9. The image display apparatus of claim 8, wherein after transmitting the audio signal based on the fourth format, in response to the number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to the reference value or an allowable value, the signal processing device is configured to switch the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device to a certain transmission mode as already mentioned. However, none of the prior art specify of the mode being of a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device. But it shall be noted Du et al. disclose of such concept related to certain mode being of a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device (par [24]; fig.4). thus, one of the ordinary skills in the art could have modified the prior art by adding such concept wherein mode being of a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device so as to provide an output device with improve power and some reduction in tethering. 13. The image display apparatus of claim 1, wherein after transmitting the audio signal based on the second format, in response to the number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to the reference value or an allowable value, the signal processing device is configured to switch the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device to a desired transmission mode, However, none of the prior art specify of the mode being of a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device. But it shall be noted Du et al. disclose of such concept related to certain mode being of a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device (par [24]; fig.4). thus, one of the ordinary skills in the art could have modified the prior art by adding such concept wherein mode being of a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device so as to provide an output device with improve power and some reduction in tethering. Claim(s) 16-17, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beckhardt et al. (US 11,831,288 B2) and Hariharan et al. (US 11,259,192 B2) and Du et al. (US 2018/0152778 A1). 16. An image display apparatus comprising: a display (fig.1C (110a); col.13 line 4-10/the playback device may be part of a television which inherently has such a display); an audio output device configured to output sound (fig.1C (114); col.13 line 10-12); an interface configured to exchange data with an external sound output device in a wired manner; a wireless communication device configured to exchange data with the external sound output device in a wireless manner (fig.1C (112); col.11 line 15-35); and a signal processing device configured to: in a mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device, wirelessly transmit an audio signal based on a first format to the external sound output device (fig.1C (112); col.6 line 25-42; col.10 line 35-40), in response to a communication from the external sound output device, wirelessly transmit an audio signal based on a second format to the external sound output device (col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). Nonetheless, Beckhardt et al never specify that such formatted signal being transmit in response to a number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to a reference value. But it shall be observed Hariharan et al. disclose of the similar aspect concerning a certain signal being transmitted in response to a retransmission requests from the external sound output device (col.13 line 10-25). Thus, one of the ordinary skills in the art could have varied the transmission of signal as noted by adding such transmission as being the result of response to a retransmission requests from the external sound output device so as to provide a robust and accurate wireless transmission. The combined teaching of Beckhardt and Hariharan et al. as a whole, further disclose after transmitting the audio signal based on the second format, in response communication from the external sound output device , switch the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device to other format transmission mode (col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). However, none of the prior art specify of the communication being according to the number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to the reference value or an allowable value, switch the mode of wireless transmission to the external sound output device to a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device. But it shall be noted Du et al. disclose of such concept related to certain mode being of a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device (par [24]; fig.4). thus, one of the ordinary skills in the art could have modified the prior art by adding such concept wherein mode being of a wired transmission mode, and transmit the audio signal by wire to the external sound output device so as to provide an output device with improve power and some reduction in tethering. Thus, one of the ordinary skills in the art could have varied the presented output signal format according to communications, by specifying if desired such communication being according to the number of retransmission requests from the external sound output device being greater than or equal to the reference value or an allowable value, if desired for achieving the same expected result so as to provide a robust and accurate transmission based on error received signal. 17. The image display apparatus of claim 16, wherein the interface is configured to receive, from the external sound output device, audio format information processable by the external sound output device, and to transmit the received audio format information to the signal processing device, wherein the signal processing device is configured to wirelessly transmit an audio signal based on an audio format, which is selected from the received audio format information based on an environment of wireless connection with the external sound output device, to the external sound output device (Beck-col.27 line 40-58/the processor may transmit the audio in varying formats). . 19. The image display apparatus of claim 16, wherein based on content being generated, the signal processing device is configured to change a format of an audio signal transmitted wirelessly to the external sound output device (Beck-col.3 line 15-30 & col.27 line 40-58). Nonetheless, the prior art never limit of the receive content to be displayed on the display, but one of the ordinary skills in the art could have modified the content to be received by specifying of displaying the content if desired for achieving the same expected result as to provide the desired wireless signal format in light of the computational capability of the device. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DISLER PAUL whose telephone number is (571)270-1187. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00-6:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chin, Vivian can be reached at (571)272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DISLER PAUL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593168
LOW-POWER PROGRAMMABLE ANALOG SUBSYSTEM FOR ACOUSTIC ACTIVITY DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593174
AUDIO PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586601
SNORING DETECTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585424
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR AUDIO PLAYBACK DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587782
BEAMFORMING SYSTEMS FOR PERSONALIZED IN-VEHICLE AUDIO DELIVERY TO MULTIPLE PASSENGERS SIMULTANEOUSLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1445 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month