Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/772,169

SYSTEM FOR ANIMAL DENTAL CLEANING

Non-Final OA §102§112§Other
Filed
Jul 13, 2024
Examiner
SINGH, SUNIL K
Art Unit
3722
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
38%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 5m
To Grant
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 38% of cases
38%
Career Allow Rate
158 granted / 415 resolved
-31.9% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 5m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
427
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 415 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 2, the phrase "may” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). In line 5, the limitation “may be configured” should be changed to state “configured.” In lines 14 and 15, the limitations “may to select” and “may activate” renders the limitation indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Maro. (US 2015/0282915). Maro discloses a system that includes: a muzzle (Fig. 1); a muzzle strap securement assembly (14) (Fig. 1); a bite member assembly (20) (Fig. 5); a mouthguard assembly (12) being located in and supported by the muzzle (Figs. 1-6). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if amendments overcome the 112 rejection and is rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO – 892 Form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUNIL K SINGH whose telephone number is (571)272-3460. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edward Lefkowitz can be reached at 571-272-2180. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUNIL K SINGH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112, §Other
Feb 26, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12575914
DIGITAL TOOTH MODEL REPLACEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560400
ACCESSORY FOR WORKING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12539545
RAPID CHANGE CHUCK ADAPTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12527651
REAL-TIME BITE ARTICULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12521831
METHOD FOR GRIPPING CONSTANT-VELOCITY UNIVERSAL JOINT COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
38%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+26.2%)
4y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 415 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month