Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/772,295

LOW DROPOUT REGULATOR AND CAPACITOR COMPENSATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 15, 2024
Priority
Oct 04, 2023 — TW 112138174
Examiner
HILTUNEN, THOMAS J
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Realtek Semiconductor Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1012 granted / 1244 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1279
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
71.3%
+31.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1244 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 and 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tsuchiya et al. (USPAPN 2007/0216381). With respect to claim 1, Tsuchiya et al. discloses, in Fig. 6, a low dropout regulator (Fig. 6), comprising: an amplifier (11), comprising a non-inverting input terminal (gate of Tr3), an inverting input terminal (gate of Tr2), an internal cascade node (node connected to the drains of Tr2 and T4, wherein Tr2 and T4 are connected in cascode) and an output terminal (node at the drains of Tr7 and Tr9); a buffer circuit (12), comprising an input terminal (gate of Tr10) and an output terminal (source of Tr10), wherein the input terminal of the buffer circuit is coupled to the output terminal of the amplifier (11 and 12 are connected as claimed), wherein the buffer circuit is a source follower structure (Tr10 has a source follower structure. Note, Tr10 is a PMOS transistor having its drain connected to ground, its source providing the output signal of the buffer 12 to the gate of Tr1 and its gate receiving the input signal of the buffer, see paragraph 0045. The 12 acts as a buffer and the source, i.e., output, terminal follows the input signal at the gate. Thus, Tr10/12 operates as a source follower and has a source follower structure); an output circuit (Tr1 with r1 and R2), comprising an input terminal (gate of Tr1) and an output terminal (drain of Tr1), wherein the input terminal of the output circuit is coupled to the output terminal of the buffer circuit (Tr1 and 12 are connected as claimed), and the output terminal of the output circuit is configured to output an output voltage (Vo); a first compensation capacitor, coupled between the output terminal of the output circuit and the internal cascade node of the amplifier (C4), and configured to separate a first pole frequency in a Bode plot of the low dropout regulator from a power supply rejection ratio corner frequency of the low dropout regulator (a bode plot of the low dropout regulator is merely a graphical representation of the low dropout regulator and not part of the low dropout regulator. Thus, the bode plot is merely a function limitation of the connections and operations of the circuitry. Additionally, C4 is connected as claimed and provides for such a separation of the first pole); and a second compensation capacitor (C3), coupled between the input terminal of the buffer circuit (gate of Tr10) and an input power source (Vi), and configured to separate a second pole frequency and a third pole frequency in the Bode plot of the low dropout regulator (again, the bode plot of the low dropout regulator is merely a graphical representation of the low dropout regulator and not part of the low dropout regulator. Thus, the bode plot is merely a function limitation of the connections and operations of the circuitry. Additionally, C3 is connected as claimed and provides for such a separation of the second and third pole frequencies. It is further noted that C3 and C4 are connected in essentially the same fashion as claimed and in the same fashion as Applicant’s claimed compensation capacitors. Thus, the compensation capacitors of Tsuchiya et al. operate as claimed), wherein a conduction state between the second compensation capacitor and the input power source is independent of a buffer voltage output by the buffer circuit (C3 is directly connected to Vi and is not controlled responsive to the buffer output voltage of 12. Thus, the circuit is connected and operative as claimed). With respect to claim 2, the low dropout regulator of claim 1, wherein the inverting input terminal of the amplifier is configured to receive a reference voltage (e1), the non-inverting input terminal of the amplifier is configured to receive a feedback voltage (Via R1 and R2), and the amplifier is configured to output a control voltage at the output terminal of the amplifier based on the reference voltage and the feedback voltage, so as to adjust the output voltage of the output circuit (the amplifier operates as claimed to generate the control voltage at the drains of Tr7 and Tr9). With respect to claim 3, the low dropout regulator of claim 2, wherein the input terminal of the buffer circuit is configured to receive the control voltage (gate of Tr10 receives the voltages at the drains of Tr7 and Tr9), and the buffer circuit is configured to output the buffer voltage at the output terminal of the buffer circuit based on the control voltage (output voltage of Tr10 to the gate of Tr1). With respect to claim 4, the low dropout regulator of claim 3, wherein the output circuit comprises a power transistor (Tr1), a control terminal of the power transistor is coupled to the output terminal of the buffer circuit (gate of Tr1 connected as claimed), a first terminal of the power transistor is coupled to the input power source (source of Tr1 connected to Vi), and a second terminal of the power transistor is coupled to the output terminal of the output circuit (drain of Tr1 connected to Vo). With respect to claim 5, the low dropout regulator of claim 4, wherein the control terminal of the power transistor is configured to receive the buffer voltage (gate of Tr1 receivers the output voltage of 12). With respect to claim 6, the low dropout regulator of claim 4, wherein the output circuit further comprises a voltage divider circuit (R1 with R2) , the voltage divider circuit is coupled to the second terminal of the power transistor (R1 connected to the drain of Tr1), the non-inverting input terminal of the amplifier (node between R1 and R2 connected to gate of Tr3) and a ground (R2 connected to GND), and configured to output the feedback voltage to the non-inverting input terminal of the amplifier based on the output voltage (voltage output from R1 and R2 to the gate of Tr3). With respect to claim 7, the low dropout regulator of claim 6, wherein the voltage divider circuit comprises a first divider resistor (R1) and a second divider resistor (R2), the first divider resistor is coupled between the second terminal of the power transistor and a first node (R1 connected as claimed), the second divider resistor is coupled between the first node and the ground (R2 connected as claimed), and the non-inverting input terminal of the amplifier is coupled to the first node (gate of Tr3 connected as claimed). With respect to claim 8, the low dropout regulator of claim 1, wherein the first pole frequency in the Bode plot is related to the capacitance of the first compensation capacitor, and the second pole frequency in the Bode plot is related to the capacitance of the second compensation capacitor (the poles are set according to the capacitances as claimed). With respect to claim 9, the low dropout regulator of claim 1, wherein in the Bode plot, the first pole frequency is lower than the second pole frequency (C4 is set for high frequencies see para 0048 and C3 is set for low frequencies, i.e., lower than high frequencies, see para 0065). Claims 19-20 merely recite the method of constructing/operating the circuit of as recited in claims 1 and 9. Claims 19-20 are rejected for essentially the same reasons as claims 1 and 9. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hua et al. (USPAPN 2016/0266591) in view of Tsuchiya et al. (USPAPN 2007/0216381). With respect to claim 10, a low dropout regulator (Fig. 3, operational details disclosed in Figs. 4-6), comprising: an amplifier (302 with 304 and current mirror connected to 304), comprising a non-inverting input terminal (gate of transistor of 302 that is connected to VFB), an inverting input terminal (gate of transistor of 302 that is connected to VREF), an internal cascade node (N1) and an output terminal (VHIZ terminal); a buffer circuit (204), comprising an input terminal (input connected to VHIZ) and an output terminal (output connected to 216), wherein the input terminal of the buffer circuit is coupled to the output terminal of the amplifier (at the VHIZ terminal); an output circuit (M1 with R1 and R2), comprising an input terminal (gate of M1) and an output terminal (drain of M1), wherein the input terminal of the output circuit is coupled to the output terminal of the buffer circuit (at 216), and the output terminal of the output circuit is configured to output an output voltage (VOUT); a first compensation capacitor (CC1), coupled between the output terminal of the output circuit (drain of M1) and the internal cascade node of the amplifier (N1), and configured to separate a first pole frequency in a Bode plot of the low dropout regulator from a power supply rejection ratio corner frequency of the low dropout regulator (a bode plot of the low dropout regulator is merely a graphical representation of the low dropout regulator and not part of the low dropout regulator. Thus, the bode plot is merely a function limitation of the connections and operations of the circuitry. Additionally, CC1 is connected as claimed and provides for such a separation of the first pole, see 0 to P1 of the bode plots of Figs. 4 and 5); and a second compensation capacitor (CC2), coupled between the input terminal (VHIZ terminal) and the output terminal of the buffer circuit (via the gate to drain connection of M2), and configured to separate a second pole frequency and a third pole frequency in the Bode plot of the low dropout regulator (again, the bode plot of the low dropout regulator is merely a graphical representation of the low dropout regulator and not part of the low dropout regulator. Thus, the bode plot is merely a function limitation of the connections and operations of the circuitry. Additionally, CC2 is connected as claimed and provides for such a separation of the second and third pole frequencies, see P2 to P3 of the bode plots of Figs. 4 and 5). Hua et al. fails to disclose the specifics of how the buffer 204 is constructed. Thus, Hua et al. fails to disclose “wherein the buffer circuit is a source follower structure”. Nevertheless, it is old and well-known to construct a buffer of a voltage regulator (such as 204 of Hua et al.) with a buffer having a source follower structure. Such an old and well-known buffer is evidenced in Fig. 6 of Tsuchiya et al. which discloses: a buffer circuit (12) for a voltage regulator (Fig. 6), comprising an input terminal (gate of Tr10) and an output terminal (source of Tr10), wherein the input terminal of the buffer circuit is coupled to the output terminal of the amplifier (11 and 12 are connected as claimed), wherein the buffer circuit is a source follower structure (Tr10 has a source follower structure. Note, Tr10 is a PMOS transistor having its drain connected to ground, its source providing the output signal of the buffer 12 to the gate of Tr1 and its gate receiving the input signal of the buffer, see paragraph 0045. The 12 acts as a buffer and the source, i.e., output, terminal follows the input signal at the gate. Thus, Tr10/12 operates as a source follower and has a source follower structure). The buffer of Tsuchiya et al. is a simply constructed buffer (i.e., requiring only one transistor and one current source) capable of providing the required buffering operation within a regulator circuit. It would have been obvious to replace the generic buffer of 204 of Hua et al. with the specific buffer of 12 (i.e., 13 with Tr10) of Fig. 6 of Tsuchiya et al. for the purpose of having a simply constructed buffer circuit that is capable of performing the required buffering operation of 204 of Hua et al. With respect to claim 11, the low dropout regulator of claim 10, wherein the inverting input terminal of the amplifier is configured to receive a reference voltage (VREF), the non-inverting input terminal of the amplifier is configured to receive a feedback voltage (VFB), and the amplifier is configured to output a control voltage at the output terminal of the amplifier based on the reference voltage and the feedback voltage, so as to adjust the output voltage of the output circuit (VHIZ is generated at the VHIZ terminal as recited). With respect to claim 12, the low dropout regulator of claim 11, wherein the input terminal of the buffer circuit is configured to receive the control voltage (input of 204 receiving VHIZ), and the buffer circuit is configured to output a buffer voltage at the output terminal of the buffer circuit based on the control voltage (VGATE). With respect to claim 13, the low dropout regulator of claim 12, wherein the output circuit comprises a power transistor (MOSFET M1), a control terminal of the power transistor is coupled to the output terminal of the buffer circuit (gate terminal), a first terminal of the power transistor is coupled to the input power source (source terminal), and a second terminal of the power transistor is coupled to the output terminal of the output circuit (drain terminal). With respect to claim 14, the low dropout regulator of claim 13, wherein the control terminal of the power transistor is configured to receive the buffer voltage (gate of M1 receives VGATE). With respect to claim 15, the low dropout regulator of claim 13, wherein the output circuit further comprises a voltage divider circuit (R1 and R2), the voltage divider circuit is coupled to the second terminal of the power transistor (drain), the non-inverting input terminal of the amplifier (VFB via 202) and a ground (ground at R2), and configured to output the feedback voltage to the non-inverting input terminal of the amplifier based on the output voltage (VFB is generated as claimed). With respect to claim 16, the low dropout regulator of claim 15, wherein the voltage divider circuit comprises a first divider resistor (R1) and a second divider resistor (R2), the first divider resistor is coupled between the second terminal of the power transistor (Drain) and a first node (VFB node), the second divider resistor is coupled between the first node (VFB node) and the ground (ground), and the non-inverting input terminal of the amplifier is coupled to the first node (gate is connected to the VFB node). With respect to claim 17, the low dropout regulator of claim 10, wherein the first pole frequency in the Bode plot is negatively related to the capacitance of the first compensation capacitor, and the second pole frequency in the Bode plot is positively related to the capacitance of the first compensation capacitor (first pole frequency the bode plot is negatively related to the capacitance of CC1 and the second pole is positively related to the capacitance of CC1 due to the pole splitting provided by CC1, see paragraphs 0030 and 0039) and the and negatively related to the capacitance of the second compensation capacitor (the second pole is negatively related to capacitance of CC2 due to the zero setting of CC2, to suppress the gain peaking of P2, see paragraphs 0039 and 0040). With respect to claim 18, the low dropout regulator of claim 10, wherein in the Bode plot, the first pole frequency is lower than the second pole frequency (f1 of P1 of Figs. 4 and 5 is lower than f2 of P2 of Figs. 4 and 5). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/25/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The argument that the transistor Tr10 of Tsuchiya et al. is a common-source configuration and cannot be interpreted as a source follower is not persuasive. This is because Tr10 is constructed to operate as a source follower buffer. Tr10 is a PMOS transistor having a drain connected to ground and a source connected to the output terminal of the buffer (i.e., at 13 and the gate of Tr1), see paragraph 0045. This is consistent with the operation of a source follower transistor. Furthermore, Tr10 is connected in essentially the same way as M2 of Applicant’s drawing of Fig. 1 (note M1 of Applicant’s Fig. 1 merely operates as a current source similar to 13 of Tsuchiya et al.). If M2 of Applicant’s Fig. 1 operates as a source follower, then Tr10 must operate as a source follower. Therefore, the Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 10-18 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. It is further noted that the buffer of Tsuchiya et al. operates as a source follower for the reasons discussed above. Cited Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fig. 16 of Horan et al. (USPN 8,272,023) discloses a circuit is connected in the same way as 12 of Tsuchiya et al. that operates as source follower. Fig. 1B of Zhang et al. (USPN 9,753,474) discloses a PMOS source follower buffer that includes a compensation transistor connected directly between the source and gate terminals of the PMOS transistors. Figs. 15a-15d of Kimura (USPAPN 2006/0208977) discloses well-known buffers constructed as source followers. Fig. 2 of Rai et al. (USPN 12,405,623) discloses a regulator having a folded cascode/cascade amplifier with a compensation capacitor (CC) connected to a node of the folded cascode amplifier and a generic buffer (120) for driving the gate and the output transistor of the regulator. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Thomas J. Hiltunen whose telephone number is (571)272-5525. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00AM-5:30PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menatoallah Youssef can be reached at (571)270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS J. HILTUNEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 15, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 25, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669839
Device and Method for Generating a Temperature-Independent Reference Voltage
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663826
VOLTAGE REFERENCE CIRCUIT
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656806
REFERENCE STARTUP CIRCUIT FOR AUDIO AMPLIFIERS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650348
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12652033
DUTY CYCLE CORRECTION CIRCUIT
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+6.0%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1244 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month