Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/772,566

INDUCTION BOARD FOR A CONVEYOR SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 15, 2024
Examiner
AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Intelligrated Headquarters LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
149 granted / 186 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
209
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 186 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Benjamin (US 10807809) in view of Mark (US 20230278808). Regarding claim-l. Benjamin discloses an induction board (110 having plate body 200, Fig.2) for a conveyor system (100 including an end plate 110, Fig.1; Abstract), the induction board (200) comprising: a first side (front side of 200 defined by 210, Fig.2) fabricated with a plurality of angled sides (310, Fig.4), wherein each of the plurality of angled sides (310) have a first sloped edge (beveled edges, Fig.4A-C); a second side (defined by left lateral side of 200, Fig.2) and a third side (defined by right lateral side of 200, Fig.2), wherein the second side is parallel to the third side (Fig.2); and a fourth side (back side of 200) positioned opposite to the first side (210), the fourth side having a fourth sloped edge (See Fig.2 for sloped edge), wherein the fourth side connects to the second side and the third side (See Fig.2), wherein the plurality of angled sides of the first side are configured to allow a user to receive or place one or more packages (objects) from or on the conveyor system from the second side, the third side, or the fourth side (the plate 200 is suitable for this use, because a package/object may move above the sides), and wherein the first sloped edge (beveled edges, Fig.4A-C) of each of the angled sides (310) of the first side (210), the of the second side (defined by left lateral side of 200, Fig.2), the of the third side (defined by right lateral side of 200, Fig.2), and the fourth sloped edge (See Fig.2 for sloped edge) of the fourth side (back side of 200) are configured to provide a smooth transition of the one or more packages from or off the induction board (the package/object may smoothly transit above the sides). Benjamin lacks the sloped edges of second and third side respectively of the induction board (200). However, it is just a mere of design and constructional detail of an apparatus in which providing a sloped edge to a side of a transfer plate to ease the transition is considered as common general knowledge. Depending on the incoming direction of the packages, the skilled person would consider to apply the geometry of the front side of the board to other sides particularly lateral sides. Mark also discloses an object conveying system to allow the transit of article/objects through several sides (See Fig.2-3), and also discloses an inboard flat surface portion (120) having a chamfered sides (154/156 or 124/126, See Fig.2-3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to the skilled person in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Benjamin induction board with sloped edges of second and third side as taught by Mark for purpose of providing chamfers on any sides of a board to provide a cleaner finish and/or avoid injuries due to sharp edges, Regarding claim-2 and 14, Benjamin as modified implicitly discloses wherein the induction board (200) defines a dimension having a length and a breadth, wherein the length corresponds to 81 centimeters (cm) and the breadth corresponds to 166 cm. Benjamin does not discloses a specific dimension however it is just a mere of design and constructional detail of an apparatus in which designing and scaling the dimension of the induction board can be selected according to desired needs and is considered as common general knowledge. Regarding claim-3 and 15, Benjamin as modified wherein the plurality of angled sides of the first side (310) are configured to provide a plurality of positions for the user to receive or place the one or more packages (Fig.4). Regarding claim-4 and 16, Benjamin as modified implicitly discloses wherein the plurality of angled sides (310) of the first side (210) comprises a first angled side and a second angled side (V-shaped Fig.4C), wherein the first angled side and the second angled side form an angle, wherein the angle corresponds to 130 degrees. Benjamin does not disclose a specific angle however it is just a mere of design and constructional detail of an apparatus in which designing and scaling the dimension or angles of the induction board can be selected according to desired needs and is considered as common general knowledge. Regarding claim-5 and 17, Benjamin as modified wherein the angle formed by the first angled side and the second angled side defines a V shape (310 is V-Shaped Fig.4C). Regarding claim-6 and 18, Benjamin as modified wherein the first sloped edge (beveled edges, Fig.4A-C) of each of the angled sides (310) of the first side (210) are chamfered (Fig.4) at a predefined angle, wherein the predefined angle corresponds to 50 degrees. Benjamin does not disclose a specific angle however it is just a mere of design and constructional detail of an apparatus in which designing and scaling the dimension or angles of the induction board can be selected according to desired needs and is considered as common general knowledge. Regarding claim-7, Benjamin as modified wherein the second side and the third side of the induction board comprises a plurality of apertures (408, See Fig.4-6; Col.7 line7-27). Regarding claim-8, Benjamin as modified wherein the plurality of apertures (408) are configured to equip one or more fasteners, wherein the one or more fasteners are configured to mount the induction board (200) with the conveyor system (100) (See Fig.4-6; Col.7 line7-27). Regarding claim-9, Benjamin as modified wherein the induction board (200) is fastened at a loading point or at an unloading point of the conveyor system and the first side of the induction board is positioned over the conveyor system (100) (See Fig.4-6; Col.7 line7-27). Regarding claim-10, Benjamin as modified wherein the fourth side (back side of 200) of the induction board (300) is monolithic with an extended portion (Fig.2), wherein the extended portion is configured to rest over an edge of the conveyor system (Fig.2, 4-6). Regarding claim-11, Benjamin as modified wherein the extended portion is configured to enable the user to maintain a predefined distance from the conveyor system (Fig.4-6). Regarding claim-12, Benjamin as modified A conveyor system (100) comprising: a conveyor assembly (100) comprising a conveyor belt (102) (See Fig.6); and an induction board (200) coupled (fastened via screws, See Fig.4-6; Col.7 line7-27) to the conveyor assembly and positioned over the conveyor belt, wherein the induction board comprises (See claim-1 rejection for following limitations): a first side fabricated with a plurality of angled sides, wherein each of the plurality of angled sides have a first sloped edge; a second side having a second sloped edge and a third side having a third sloped edge, wherein the second side is parallel to the third side; and PNG media_image1.png 1 1 media_image1.png Greyscale a fourth side positioned opposite to the first side, the fourth side having a fourth sloped edge, wherein the fourth side connects to the second side and the third side, wherein the plurality of angled sides of the first side are configured to allow a user to receive or place one or more packages from or on the conveyor system from the second side, the third side, or the fourth side, and wherein the first sloped edge of each of the angled sides of the first side, the second sloped edge of the second side, the third sloped edge of the third side, and the fourth sloped edge of the fourth side are configured to provide a smooth transition of the one or more packages from or off the induction board. Regarding claim-13, Benjamin as modified A method comprising: fastening (fastened via screws, See Fig.4-6; Col.7 line7-18) an induction board (200) at a loading point or at an unloading point of a conveyor system (100) from a first side of the induction board (See claim-1 rejection for following limitations), wherein the first side of the induction board is positioned over the conveyor system, wherein the induction board further comprising: the first side fabricated with a plurality of angled sides, wherein each of the plurality of angled sides have a first sloped edge; a second side having a second sloped edge and a third side having a third sloped edge, wherein the second side is parallel to the third side; and a fourth side positioned opposite to the first side, the fourth side having a fourth sloped edge, wherein the fourth side connects to the second side and the third side, wherein the plurality of angled sides of the first side are configured to allow a user to receive or place one or more packages from or on the conveyor system from the second side, the third side, or the fourth side, and wherein the first sloped edge of each of the angled sides of the first side, the second sloped edge of the second side, the third sloped edge of the third side, and the fourth sloped edge of the fourth side are configured to provide a smooth transition of the one or more packages from or off the induction board. Regarding claim-19, Benjamin as modified (See claims 7-9 rejections) wherein the second side and the third side of the induction board comprises a plurality of apertures, wherein the plurality of apertures is configured to equip one or more fasteners, wherein the one or more fasteners are configured to mount the induction board with the conveyor system. Regarding claim-20, Benjamin as modified (See claims 10-11 rejections) wherein the fourth side of the induction board is monolithic with an extended portion, wherein the extended portion is configured to rest over an edge of the conveyor system, wherein the extended portion is configured to enable the user to maintain a predefined distance from the conveyor system. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUHAMMAD AWAIS whose telephone number is (571)272-4955. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7-4 pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at (571)272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MA/Examiner, Art Unit 3651 /GENE O CRAWFORD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 15, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582996
GOLD PAN WITH AREAS OF DIFFERING SURFACE TEXTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570480
CONVEYANCE PATH SWITCHING APPARATUS, CONVEYANCE SYSTEM, AND CONVEYANCE PATH SWITCHING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565382
MOTOR DRIVEN ROLLER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM FOR CONVEYANCE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12565384
CONVEYANCE PATH SWITCHING APPARATUS, CONVEYANCE SYSTEM, AND CONVEYANCE PATH SWITCHING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12552616
Apparatus for Conveying Objects
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 186 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month