Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/772,672

SWITCH DEVICE AND TIMEPIECE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 15, 2024
Priority
Jul 25, 2023 — JP 2023-120673
Examiner
WALKER, MICHAEL JAMES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
23 granted / 27 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
37
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§112
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 27 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kitahara, et al (US 20140078872, hereinafter Kitahara). Regarding claim 1, Kitahara discloses a “switch device (5) comprising: a case (1) provided with a through hole (12); a cylindrical member (7) whose at least one portion is inserted into the through hole of the case (para. [0037], "cylinder section 7a that is fitted into the small-diameter hole section 12a of the through hole 12"); an operation member (para. [0033], "operation member"; fig. 2, element 8) arranged extending from inside of the cylindrical member to outside of the cylindrical member (the operation member extends from inside of the cylindrical member to the outside of the cylindrical member and covers the cylindrical member); and a locking mechanism which locks the operation member to the cylindrical member (para. [0033], "lock section", fig. 2, element 9), wherein the locking mechanism includes a locking member (para. [0046], “operation head section 18” comprising a “female screw section 19”; fig. 2, elements 18 and 19) which is locked to the cylindrical member by a rotation operation of the operation member (para. [0049], "the female screw section 19 is screwed into the male screw section 14 by the rotation of the operation head section 18 to cause the operation member 8 to be locked"), and a rotation transmission member (para. [0033], "external member"; fig. 2, element 11) which is a separate member from the locking member (the external member (11) is separate from the locking member (18,19)) and rotates the locking member in accordance with the rotation operation of the operation member (when the external member (11) is rotated, it transfers the rotary motion to the locking member).” Regarding claim 2, Kitahara discloses “the cylindrical member (para. [0033], "cylindrical member"; fig. 2, element 7) includes a small-diameter cylindrical portion which is inserted into the through hole of the case (para. [0037], "small-diameter cylinder section"; fig. 2, element 7a), and a large-diameter cylindrical portion which protrudes outside the case (para. [0037], "a large-diameter cylinder section"; fig. 2, element 7b), and wherein the locking member (para. [0046], “operation head section 18” comprising a “female screw section 19”; fig. 2, elements 18 and 19) is arranged on an inner circumferential surface side of the rotation transmission member (para. [0033], "external member"; fig. 2, element 11; the locking member (18,19) is arranged on the inner circumferential surface of the external element) and locked to the large-diameter cylindrical portion of the cylindrical member (the female screw section (19) locks to the cylindrical member (7)).” Regarding claim 3, Kitahara discloses “the operation member includes an operation shaft portion (6 and 6a-c) which is arranged in the cylindrical member (the shaft is inside the cylindrical member (7)), and an operation head portion which is attached to an outer part of the operation shaft portion in a manner to be slidable in an axial direction and covers the large-diameter cylindrical portion of the cylindrical member (the operation head portion slides axially with respect to the shaft and covers the large diameter portion).” Regarding claim 17, Kitahara discloses “a male screw portion (para. [0041], "a male screw section", fig.2, element 14) is formed on an outer circumferential surface of the large-diameter cylindrical portion (para. [0041], "the outer peripheral surface of the large-diameter cylinder section"; fig. 2, element 7b) of the cylindrical member.” Regarding claim 18, Kitahara discloses “a male screw portion (para. [0041], "a male screw section", fig.2, element 14) is formed on an outer circumferential surface of the large-diameter cylindrical portion (para. [0041], "the outer peripheral surface of the large-diameter cylinder section"; fig. 2, element 7b) of the cylindrical member.” Regarding claim 19, Kitahara discloses “a female screw portion (para. [0046], “female screw section”, fig. 2, element 19) which is screwed onto the male screw portion of the cylindrical member (para. [0041], "a male screw section", fig. 2, element 14) is formed in the locking member (the female screw section (19) is formed in the operation head section (18)).” Regarding claim 20, Kitahara discloses “A timepiece comprising the switch device according to claim 1 (para. [0029], "a switch device of a wristwatch").” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Kitahara. Regarding claim 4, Kitahara discloses the invention according to claim 3. However Kitahara fails to specifically disclose “the rotation transmission member is fixed in the operation head portion of the operation member by press fitting”. Kitahara instead discloses that the parts are ‘swaged’ together (para. [0082]) to create a single piece from the individual parts. Press fitting of parts is routine and ordinary in the art of horology to combine parts into a single piece from the individual parts. Both press fitting and swaging are processes by which metal is deformed under pressure. The following is an excerpt from MPEP § 2113(I): "[E]ven though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process." In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to use press fitting to join the components of Kitahara by pressure with the expected result of forming an assembled part. Thus, Kitahara anticipates, or alternatively makes obvious the switch device according to claim 4. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J WALKER whose telephone number is (571)270-7599. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM ET Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at (571)272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL JAMES WALKER/Examiner, Art Unit 2831 /renee s luebke/Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681438
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING COUPLING MEMBER
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669784
CROWN SENSING SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRONIC WATCH
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669782
LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12656742
ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING BODY-CONTACTABLE ELECTRODE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12613498
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND TIMEPIECE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (-4.6%)
2y 9m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 27 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month