Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 28, 2026
Application No. 18/772,824

IMPRINT APPARATUS, IMPRINT METHOD, AND ARTICLE MANUFACTURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 15, 2024
Priority
Aug 03, 2023 — JP 2023-127248
Examiner
TENTONI, LEO B
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1141 granted / 1394 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1417
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
69.8%
+29.8% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1394 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 9, the expression “a marks” (both occurences) is confusing and unclear. In claim 8, line 2, the expression “a marks” is confusing and unclear. In claim 13, lines 6 and 7, the expression “a marks” is confusing and unclear. In claim 14, line 9, the expression “a marks” (both occurrences) is confusing and unclear. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-14 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: None of the prior art references currently of record, alone or in combination, disclose, suggest or teach an imprint apparatus, including a control unit to perform control such that an adjustment of a light amount adjusting mechanism is started such that an illumination condition when an alignment illumination unit illuminates a shot area on which a pattern is to be next formed is satisfied (as recited in claim 1). None of the prior art references currently of record, alone or in combination, disclose, suggest or teach an imprint process, including performing control such that adjustment of a light amount adjusting mechanism is started such that an illumination condition when a shot area on which a pattern is to be next formed is illuminated in the illumination step is satisfied (as recited in claim 13). None of the prior art references currently of record, alone or in combination, disclose, suggest or teach an article manufacturing method, including a control unit to perform control such that an adjustment of a light amount adjusting mechanism is started such that an illumination condition when an alignment illumination unit illuminates a shot area on which a pattern is to be next formed is satisfied (as recited in claim 14). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited references are of interest. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEO B. TENTONI whose telephone number is (571)272-1209. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-4:00 ET M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina A. Johnson can be reached at (571)272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEO B. TENTONI Primary Examiner Art Unit 1742 /LEO B TENTONI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 12, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629888
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629895
METHODS FOR PRODUCING THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624477
A METHOD FOR PROVIDING A FILTERED SPINNING DOPE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12606488
ELECTROCERAMIC COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING IT
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606497
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIMITING VOID FORMATION IN CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITE COMPONENTS
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1394 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month