Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/773,654

OPTICALLY PUMPED MAGNETOMETER AND MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPH

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Examiner
CURRAN, GREGORY H
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyoto University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
753 granted / 834 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
852
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 834 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5, 7, and 9-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Moriya et al. (US 2021/0386347 A1), hereinafter referred to as Moriya. With reference to claim 1 , Moriya teaches an optically pumped magnetometer comprising: a cell configured to be filled with alkali metal vapor (Fig. 1, 1A, ¶0018); a pump light incidence unit configured to cause pump light for pumping alkali metal atoms constituting the alkali metal vapor to be incident on a sensitivity region inside the cell in a first direction (Fig. 1, 10, ¶0018); a probe light incidence unit configured to cause probe light for detecting change in electron spins in a pumped state of the alkali metal atoms to be incident on the sensitivity region in a direction intersecting the first direction (Fig. 1, 11, ¶0018); a bias magnetic field coil configured to apply a bias magnetic field in the first direction to the inside of the cell and determine a resonance frequency of the electron spins (¶0026); a gradient correction coil configured to correct a gradient of the bias magnetic field applied through the bias magnetic field coil (¶0041, Fig. 1, 8A, 8B); an electron spin tilting unit configured to tilt a rotation axis direction of the electron spins in a direction perpendicular to the first direction (Fig. 1, 21, ¶0035); an optical sensor configured to detect the probe light having passed through the sensitivity region (Fig. 1, 1A, ¶0018); and a magnetic field measuring unit configured to measure a magnetic field strength related to the sensitivity region based on an output of the optical sensor (Fig. 1, 1A, ¶0018). With reference to claim 2, Moriya further teaches the gradient correction coil includes a pair of first coils disposed on one side and the other side of the cell in the first direction and correcting an amount of change in the bias magnetic field with respect to an amount of change in position in the first direction (¶0041, Fig. 1, 8A, 8B). With reference to claim 5, Moriya further teaches the gradient correction coil corrects the gradient of the bias magnetic field such that a relaxation time of free induction decay obtained from an output of the optical sensor becomes longer than a first time when correction by the gradient correction coil is not performed (¶0041, ¶0067, ¶0068). With reference to claim 7, Moriya further teaches the gradient correction coil corrects the gradient of the bias magnetic field such that a spectral peak after fast Fourier transform regarding a relaxation time of free induction decay obtained from an output of the optical sensor becomes steeper than when correction by the gradient correction coil is not performed (¶0041, ¶0067, ¶0068) With reference to claim 9, Moriya further teaches one or a plurality of mirrors configured to reflect the probe light traveling inside the cell toward the outside of the cell or having traveled from the inside of the cell to the outside of the cell such that the probe light returns to the inside of the cell (Fig. 1, L2). With reference to claim 10, Moriya further teaches the electron spin tilting unit radiates an RF signal having the same frequency as the resonance frequency (Fig. 1, 21, ¶0035). With reference to claim 11, Moriya further teaches the electron spin tilting unit radiates pulsed light (Fig. 1, 1A, ¶0018). With reference to claim 12, Moriya further teaches there are two or more of the sensitivity regions, and the magnetic field measuring unit measures the magnetic field strength based on a difference between outputs of the optical sensor corresponding to the two adjacent sensitivity regions (Fig. 1, ¶0019). With reference to claim 13, Moriya further teaches A magnetoencephalograph comprising: the optically pumped magnetometer according to claim 1 configured to be provided in a manner of being able to be disposed around the head of a test object and measure a strength of a magnetic field emitted from the test object (Fig. 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 4, 6, and 8 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed "gradient correction coil includes a pair of second coils disposed on one side and the other side of the cell in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction and correcting an amount of change in the bias magnetic field with respect to an amount of change in position in the second direction" in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claim 3. The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed "gradient correction coil includes a pair of third coils disposed on one side and the other side of the cell in the first direction and correcting an amount of change in the bias magnetic field with respect to an amount of change in position in a third direction perpendicular to the first direction" in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claim 4. The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed "gradient correction coil corrects the gradient of the bias magnetic field such that the relaxation time of free induction decay obtained from an output of the optical sensor becomes the longest" in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claim 6. The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed "gradient correction coil corrects the gradient of the bias magnetic field such that the spectral peak after fast Fourier transform regarding the relaxation time of free induction decay obtained from an output of the optical sensor becomes the steepest" in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claim 8. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kobayashi et al. (US 10,288,701 B2) teaches an optically pumped atomic magnetometer and magnetic sensing method. Kim et al. (US 11,105,865 B2) teach a high-sensitivity multi-channel atomic magnetometer. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY H CURRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7505. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay can be reached at (571) 272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY H CURRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 16, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601802
System and Method for Producing Magnetic Resonance Images with In-Plane Simultaneous Multi-Segments and for Producing 3D Magnetic Resonance Images with Reduced Field-of-View
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601798
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601805
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction Method and Apparatus, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596163
Magnetic Resonance Tomography System and Method for Operating a Magnetic Resonance Tomography System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584980
MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNING AND IMAGING METHOD AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+4.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 834 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month