Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/774,781

SHEET PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Priority
Jul 18, 2023 — JP 2023-117065 +1 more
Examiner
NICHOLSON III, LESLIE AUGUST
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1192 granted / 1349 resolved
+36.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1360
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1349 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Examiner’s Note 1. The Examiner notes the Notice of Allowance issued 7/7/2026 is hereby withdrawn for reason(s) shown below. These are based on the claim set filed on 6/17/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 3. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites a back-portion former (identified in the Specification [see at least ¶0094,0109,0129] as elements 132 and 134b) and a crimp binder (identified in the Specification [see at least ¶0094,0109,0129] as elements 132 and 134). Furthermore, claim 2 recites the center folding including a folding plate (element 132) which appears to be the same element as the crimp binder while claim 3 recites the back-crimp binder includes a folding-plate engagement member (element 134). It is not clear how the Applicant is claiming distinct elements that are made up of the same elements. Allowable Subject Matter 4. The following is an indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not appear to disclose or suggest at least “circuitry configured to cause the back-crimp binder to form a crimp mark parallel to the fold portion on the back portion of the fold portion” wherein the crimp-binding process is performed “on the back portion of the fold portion subjected to the center-folding process”. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LESLIE A. NICHOLSON III whose telephone number is (571)272-5487. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael C McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LESLIE A NICHOLSON III/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653 8/14/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 16, 2024
Application Filed
May 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 08, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 21, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741843
MEDIA PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741844
PRINTING SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PRINTING SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741835
SHEET CONVEYANCE APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741829
VEHICLE AND MATERIAL HANDLER
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735290
SHEET POST-PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1349 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month