Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/774,850

FAULT DETECTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, HOAI AN D
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Dac System SA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
612 granted / 711 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§102
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 711 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on July 16, 2024 is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as those of claims 1-9 and 13-15 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,066,478 B2 issued to Delmastro et al. (having the same inventive entity with that of the instant application under examination). This is a statutory double patenting rejection. It is a notable fact that a transmitting station’s structure includes the antenna system (a mast or tower with antennas), the transmitter that generates the radio or TV signal, feeder cables (a waveguide) to connect the transmitter to the antenna, and a power supply with backup systems. Therefore, the recitation, “a waveguide of a transmitting station for radio or television”, in Delmastro et al., inherently reads on the limitation, “a waveguide connecting a transmitter to a radio antenna in a transmitting or transmitting/receiving radio system”, as recited in the preamble of claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Applicant’s attention is invited to the followings whose inventions disclose similar devices. Schmidt (US 4,224,622 A) teaches an apparatus for eliminating amplitude modulation interference in conically scanning radars. Cioffi et al. (EP 4 333 388 A2) teaches systems and methods for implementing high-speed data transmission systems using waveguide-mode transmission over wires. Fang et al. (CN 103630943 B) teaches a method and a system for using ultra-wideband carrier-free pulse radar for detecting the lunar soil thickness and moon subsurface geologic structure . CONTACT INFORMATION Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOAI-AN D. NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571) 272-2170. The examiner can normally be reached MON-THURS (7:00 AM - 5:00 PM). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LEE E. RODAK can be reached at 571-270-5628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HOAI-AN D. NGUYEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2858 /HOAI-AN D. NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 16, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597926
VEHICLE STEERING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591021
SHORT-CIRCUIT DETERMINATION CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576711
STEERING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578410
METHOD FOR CORRECTING CAPACITANCE MEASUREMENT VALUE UNDER HIGH LEAKAGE CURRENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571817
SENSORED INSULATION PLUG WITH DETECTION CONTACT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 711 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month