Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 24, 2026
Application No. 18/776,025

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR WOUND TREATMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 17, 2024
Priority
Oct 06, 2017 — provisional 62/569,025 +4 more
Examiner
BERRIOS, JENNIFER A
Art Unit
1613
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Eluciderm Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
37%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 37% of cases
37%
Career Allowance Rate
302 granted / 815 resolved
-22.9% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+49.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
884
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 815 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I, claims 1-7, 9-16, 15-16, 28 and 29-32 in the reply filed on 6/2/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Group I appears to be free of prior art as such claims 17 and 27 are eligible for rejoinder once the issues below are resolved. Examiner suggests amending claim 27 to recite “A method of reducing dermal fibrosis or scarring during healing of a cutaneous wound…”. However, claim 24 is not eligible for rejoinder. Applicant should consider canceling this claim in the next response. Claim Objections Claim 4 objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 4 recites “PEG is in an amount” instead of “PEG is present in an amount”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1-7, 9-13, 15-16 and 29-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1(b) recites the limitation "the terminal aliphatic carboxylic acid groups of the HA". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For purposes of examination the examiner has examined the claim as reciting “the terminal aliphatic carboxylic acid groups of the GO”. Relevant Prior Art Claim interpretation: Claim 1 recites “GO-HA conjugate is prepared by…” while this a product-by-process step, the modification of the GO to provide terminal aliphatic carboxylic acid groups to form modified GO results in a structural difference as compared to GO which has not been modified. Wu 2014, cited on the 7/17/2024 IDS, discloses HA-GO conjugate for targeted drug delivery PNG media_image1.png 490 734 media_image1.png Greyscale and teaches activating the carboxylic acid groups of the GO, but does not teach the GO to have been modified to provide terminal aliphatic carboxylic acid groups and does not teach XAV939. Jia 2015 discusses covalently crosslinked graphene oxide (GO) membranes with adjustable intersheet spacing by esterification reactions, using dicarboxylic acids, diols or polyols as the crosslinker and hydrochloric acid as the catalyst. Jia teaches the GO to have aliphatic terminal carboxylic acid groups (Scheme 1) but does not provide a motivation or suggestion to use this in combination with HA and XAV939. Ran 2017, cited on the 7/17/2024 IDS, discusses hyaluronic acid-templated Ag Nanoparticles/Graphene Oxide (GO-HA-AgNPs) composites for synergistic therapy of bacterial infection. Ran teaches that the GO-HA-AgNPs are prepared for in vivo experiments and show excellent antibacterial property in wound disinfection model (Abs). Ran teaches the GO and the HA to be linked and teaches this to be performed by a) preparing HA-ADH (adipic acid dihydrazide) by dissolving HA in 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer, adding dimethyl sulfoxide-deionized (DMSO-DI) water (1:1, 1 mL) containing EDC (192 mg) and NHS (232 mg) to this solution, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 6.0 and the solution was stirred overnight. To finish the reaction, the pH was adjusted to 7.0 with a 30-fold molar excess of ADH added. A spongy-like HA-ADH was obtained by freeze-drying.; b) HA-AgNps were prepared by mixing AgNo3 and HA-ADH and c) GO-HA-AgNPs were prepared by dispersing GO sheets in MES buffer and EDC and NHS were added and mixed, afterwards to HA-AgNPs were added to the systems and the reactant mixture was dialyzed. Ran does not teach the GO to have been modified to provide terminal aliphatic carboxylic acid groups and does not teach XAV939. The prior art above, neither alone or combination, makes obvious a composition comprising a GO-HA conjugate wherein the GO is modified to comprise terminal aliphatic carboxylic acid groups which react with the derivatized HA, wherein the composition also comprises XAV939. Conclusion No claims are allowable. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jennifer A Berrios whose telephone number is (571)270-7679. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday from 9am-4pm and Friday 9am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Kwon can be reached at (571) 272-0581. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER A BERRIOS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740930
COMPOSITION FOR TREATING HAIR OR FIBERS, COMPRISING ALKYL KETENE COMPOUND
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728087
HAIR CONDITIONER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12708598
COMPOSITION FOR CARING FOR A KERATIN MATERIAL
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12678381
BIODEGRADABLE POLYESTERS FOR WATER-RESISTANT WATER-IN-OIL SUNCARE FORMULATIONS
5y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667536
HAIR TREATMENT METHOD
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
37%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+49.7%)
3y 7m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 815 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month