Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/776,488

ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, IMAGE FORMING METHOD, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 18, 2024
Priority
Jul 24, 2023 — JP 2023-119913
Examiner
EVANS, BOONE ALEXANDER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Konica Minolta Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
159 granted / 241 resolved
+6.0% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
250
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.6%
+16.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 241 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Matsumoto et al. (US PGP 2011/0305982 A1). Matsumoto teaches a toner including toner particles containing a binder resin containing a polyester resin A obtained by subjecting aromatic dicarboxylic acid, rosin, and trivalent or higher-valent alcohol as starting materials to polycondensation, and a polyester resin B obtained by subjecting aromatic dicarboxylic acid and polyalcohol as starting materials to polycondensation (Abstract). The toner is further taught to include a colorant and a dispersing aid for dispersing the polyester resin A into the polyester resin B ([0007]) (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 2). In the examples, a dispersing aid PGA1 was prepared in which polyacryl was graft-polymerized with polypropylene. The polyacryl component was taught to contain isobornyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, butyl acrylate, and 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate as monomer units ([0148]). In other words, the dispersing aid PGA1 included a constituent unit represented by the claimed general formula (1)/general formula (3) (isobornyl acrylate), a constituent unit represented by the claimed general formula (2)/general formula (4) (2-ethylhexyl methacrylate) (which reads on the corresponding limitations recited in instant claim 1 and claim 6), and another constituent unit other than the constituent units represented by the claimed general formula (1)/general formula (3) and the claimed general formula (2)/general formula (4), wherein the another constituent unit has a constituent unit derived from (meth)acrylic acid/(meth)acrylic acid esters (methyl methacrylate, butyl acrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate) (which reads on the corresponding limitations recited in instant claim 3, claim 4, and claim 5). In another example, a dispersing aid PGA3 was prepared the same as above, except the polyacryl component was graft-polymerized with polystyrene ([0177]). In other words, the dispersing aid PGA3 further included another constituent unit derived from styrene (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 4). The liquid containing the dispersing aid was taught to be mixed with a master batch containing carbon black, a charge control agent, and the polyester resin A with a release agent and the polyester resin B ([0150]). The admixture was then melt-kneaded, cooled and pulverized, and classified to obtain toner particles ([0153]-[0158]) (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 7 and claim 8). An image forming apparatus commercially known as “MX-2700” was then filled with a developer including the toner containing the toner particles and was used to form an image by adhering the toner particles to a recording medium ([0186]) (which reads on the corresponding limitations recited in instant claim 9 and claim 10). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: U.S. Pre-Grant Publication 2007/0269733 A1 to Ohta et al. teaches a toner comprising a colored particle containing a binder resin, a colorant, and a release agent (Abstract). The colored particles are taught to contain a viscoelasticity control resin including isobornyl acrylate ([0169]). In the examples, a resin composition including styrene, n-butyl acrylate, divinylbenzene, glycidyl methacrylate, and isobornyl acrylate was ground with a cyan pigment to produce the colored particles ([0171]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Boone A Evans whose telephone number is (571)272-1420. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BOONE ALEXANDER EVANS/Examiner, Art Unit 1737 08/08/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736889
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730390
FINE PARTICLE, EXTERNAL ADDITIVE FOR TONERS, AND TONER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724355
ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTORECEPTOR, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724356
TONER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12704796
ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC INK COMPOSITIONS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+23.3%)
2y 9m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 241 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month