Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/776,614

Door Rail System

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 18, 2024
Examiner
AGUDELO, PAOLA
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
C R Laurence Co. Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
574 granted / 745 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
769
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 745 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 5-7 in the reply filed on 3/3/26 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regard to claim 6, the claim fails to further limit the subject matter of claim 5, thus rendering the scope indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choi US 9,303,444 B1 (hereinafter ‘Choi’). In regard to claims 5 and 6, Choi teaches a door rail assembly (see fig. 6), comprising: a rail (20), a door panel (90), and at least one accessory (100); the door rail including a channel (60) for securing the door panel and an accessory channel (70) for securing the at least one accessory, the accessory channel disposed below the channel for securing the panel (as seen in fig. 6); the accessory channel including a dovetail (400) and the at least one accessory including a dovetail groove (as seen in fig. 6); and wherein the at least one accessory is secured to the door rail by sliding the dovetail groove of the at least one accessory over the dovetail of the accessory channel (see col. 4, ln. 56). It is noted that the claim does not require a specific location of the dovetail or the dovetail groove, but merely requires them to be included in the accessory channel. The dovetail and dovetail groove of Choi are included in the channel and have slidable capabilities thus Choi meets the claim. In regard to claim 7, Choi teaches the claimed invention wherein the at least one accessory is selected from the group consisting of door alignment devices and door locking devices. Note that the claim does not require any specific structure for the accessory (100), which is capable of being a door alignment device (per MPEP 2114) because it is a mounting member that aids in adjusting the location of the second mounting member (200) in alignment with the accessory (100). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAOLA AGUDELO whose telephone number is (571)270-7986. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM - 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian E Glessner can be reached at 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAOLA AGUDELO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601176
MODULAR BUILDING SYSTEM FOR HARDSCAPE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600439
ILLUMINATED MARINE LADDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601173
MULTI-STORY BUILDING HAVING PREFABRICATED STAIR AND ELEVATOR MODULES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601514
ROOF VENTILATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590471
Portable Shelter
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+16.8%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 745 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month