DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Amendment
Claims 1 and 3-20 are currently pending. In response to the Office Action mailed 4/08/2026 Applicant amended claims 1, 3 and 20 and canceled claim 2
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20200336639 A1 to Hu et al.
Regarding Claim 1. Hu discloses an optical element driving mechanism, comprising: a fixed assembly (Fig. 2 fixed assembly 1-10); a movable assembly (Fig. 2 movable assembly 1-20), configured to be connected to an optical element (Fig. 2 the photosensitive element 1-122), wherein the movable assembly is movable relative to the fixed assembly; and a driving module, configured to drive the movable assembly to move relative to the fixed assembly (Fig. 2 first driving assembly 1-30 para 64 “configured to drive the first movable assembly 1-20 to move relative to the fixed assembly 1-10”), wherein the fixed assembly includes a casing (Fig. 2 frame 1-102) and a base (Fig. 2 base plate 1-120); the casing and the base are arranged along a main axis (as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 4); the optical element driving mechanism further includes a first circuit assembly (See Fig. 4 circuit member body 1-1141); the first circuit assembly has a body portion (as shown in Fig. 4), and the optical element is disposed on the body portion (See Fig. 4 photosensitive element 1-122); the body portion is connected to the movable assembly (See Fig. 2 and Fig. 3); and the first circuit assembly further has a cantilever which is connected between the body portion and the casing (See Fig. 2-3 cantilevers 1-1143).
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 3-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 6/23/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the prior art of record fails to disclose that “the first circuit assembly has a body portion; the body portion is connected to the movable assembly. the first circuit assembly further has a cantilever which is connect between the body portion and the casing”. Applicant arguments are not persuasive, as seen in the prior art of record, both Fig. 2 and Fig. 4 shows a body portion of circuit 1-1141, connected to other components of the movable assembly. The circuit being a component of the movably assembly among a plurality of components does not disqualify the body portion from being connected to the moveable assembly. Further it is clear from the prior art of record that the cantilever which is connected between the body portion and the casing.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDMOND C LAU whose telephone number is (571)272-5859. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8am-6pm EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at (571) 272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/EDMOND C LAU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Prosecution Insights