Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/777,804

SERVER CANISTER FOR LIQUID-COOLED SERVER RACKS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 04, 2024 — provisional 63/561,222
Examiner
AL SAMIRI, KHALED AHMED ALI
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
AMD Design LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
68 granted / 145 resolved
-23.1% vs TC avg
Strong +59% interview lift
Without
With
+59.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
189
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 145 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, filed with respect to the previously set forth rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) have been fully considered and are persuasive in view of the Amendment. Accordingly, the previously set forth rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) have been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed with respect to the prior art rejections have been fully considered but they are moot. Applicant has amended the claims to recite new combinations of limitations. Applicant’s arguments are directed at the amendment. Please see below for new grounds of rejection, necessitated by Amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-5, 7-9, and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over TUFTY (US 20210153390 A1: Previously cited). Regarding Claim 1, TUFTY teaches a canister (Chassis 22 and other related structures shown in fig. 5) for coupling a plurality of servers (server 16) to a server rack (server rack shown in FIG. 8A, 8B, etc.), the canister comprising: a canister frame (U-shaped bracket 28 shown in fig. 5) including a rear wall (rear wall 40 para. 0034 shown in FIG. 4); an influent first manifold (Supply manifolds 42, 142, 216, etc.) attached to the rear wall of the canister frame (see Figure 5), the influent first manifold including a plurality of influent first manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings (cooling liquid inlet 208 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) arranged in fixed positions and configured to couple with influent server QD fittings on the servers (supply server coupling 48b para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4); an effluent first manifold (return manifolds 44, 144, 218, etc) attached to the rear wall of the canister frame (see Figure 5), the effluent first manifold including a plurality of effluent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid outlet 210 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) arranged in fixed positions and configured to couple with effluent server QD fittings on the servers (return server QD coupling 52b para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4); an influent canister QD fitting (supply canister QD coupling 48a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) disposed on an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame (see in annotated FIG. 4 where the supply canister QD coupling 48a are disposed on an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame) and coupled with the influent first manifold (Supply manifolds 42, 142, 216, etc.), the influent canister QD fitting being configured to couple with an influent second manifold QD fitting (supply manifold QD coupling 142f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) an influent second manifold (supply manifolds 142 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B) of the server rack; and an effluent canister QD fitting (return canister QD coupling 52a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) disposed on the exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame (see in annotated FIG. 4 where the return canister QD coupling 52a are disposed on an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame) and coupled with the effluent first manifold (return manifolds 44, 144, 218, etc), the effluent canister QD fitting being configured to couple with an effluent second manifold QD fitting (return manifold QD coupling 144f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) of an effluent second manifold (return manifolds 144 para. 0047 FIG. 8B) of the server rack. TUFTY does not teach the influent first manifold attached to an interior side of the rear wall of the canister frame and the effluent first manifold attached to the interior side of the rear wall of the canister frame. However, there is no evidence of record that establishes that changing the locations of the influent first manifold and the effluent first manifold would result in a difference in function of TUFTY’s device. Further, a person having ordinary skill in the art, being faced with modifying the locations of the influent first manifold and the effluent first manifold of TUFTY’s device, would have a reasonable expectation of success in making such a modification and it appears the device would function as intended being given the claimed locations. Lastly, applicant has not disclosed that the claimed locations solve any stated problem, indicating that the locations of the influent first manifold and the effluent first manifold “may” be disposed on either side of the rear wall (specification at para. [0040]) and therefore there appears to be no criticality placed on the locations as claimed such that it produces an unexpected result. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the influent first manifold and the effluent first manifold of TUFTY’s device to be attached to the interior side of the rear wall of the canister frame as an obvious matter of design choice within the skill of the art. PNG media_image1.png 879 1428 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 919 809 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2, TUFTY as modified further teaches wherein the influent first manifold (Supply manifolds 42, 142, 216, etc) and the effluent first manifold (return manifolds 44, 144, 218, etc) are formed as portions of a single structure (See Figure 4). Regarding Claim 3, TUFTY as modified further teaches wherein the influent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid inlet 208 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) and the effluent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid outlet 210 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) are arranged in respective linear arrays (FIG. 2). Regarding Claim 4, TUFTY as modified further teaches wherein the linear arrays are parallel (FIG. 2). Regarding Claim 5, TUFTY as modified further teaches wherein the influent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid inlet 208 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) and the effluent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid outlet 210 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) are blind mate fittings (para. 0034). Regarding Claim 7, TUFTY further teaches wherein the canister frame (U-shaped bracket 28 shown in fig. 5) is formed of sheet metal (para. 0033). Regarding Claim 8, TUFTY further teaches wherein the canister frame (U-shaped bracket 28 shown in fig. 5) is configured to mount to the server rack (server rack shown in FIG. 8A, 8B, etc.). Regarding Claim 9, TUFTY further teaches wherein the canister frame (U-shaped bracket 28 shown in fig. 5) includes server portions (server 16) configured to orient the servers within the canister (Chassis 22 and other related structures shown in fig. 5). Regarding Claim 12, TUFTY further teaches wherein at least one of: the influent canister QD fitting (supply canister QD coupling 48a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) is coupled to the influent first manifold (Supply manifolds 42, 142, 216, etc) via an influent canister hose (supply lines 146 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B); or the effluent canister QD fitting (return canister QD coupling 52a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) is coupled to the effluent first manifold (return manifolds 44, 144, 218, etc) via an effluent canister hose (return lines 150 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B). Regarding Claim 13, TUFTY further teaches wherein at least one of: the influent canister QD fitting (supply canister QD coupling 48a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) is coupled to the canister via an influent canister QD bracket (a front wall 30 of the u-shaped bracket 28 includes a plurality of blind-mate power connectors 32 para. 0033 shown in FIG. 4); or the effluent canister QD fitting (return canister QD coupling 52a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) is coupled to the canister via an effluent canister QD bracket (a front wall 30 of the u-shaped bracket 28 includes a plurality of blind-mate power connectors 32 para. 0033 shown in FIG. 4). Regarding Claim 14, TUFTY further teaches wherein the canister (Chassis 22 and other related structures shown in fig. 5) is configured to couple three or more servers to the server rack (server rack shown in FIG. 8A, 8B, etc.). Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over TUFTY (US 20210153390 A1: Previously cited) in view of GAO (JP 2022015090 A: Previously cited). Regarding Claim 15, TUFTY does not teach the canister configured to receive 19 or 21 inch servers. GAO teaches wherein the canister (mounting structure 200 for the PDB of the server chassis shown in FIG. 2 description of embodiments para. 13) is configured to receive 19 inch or 21-inch servers (The adjustment rail 222 is compatibly mounted on different types of chassis with different shape factors, such as 19-inch or 21-inch chassis types shown in FIG. 2 description of embodiments para. 13). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the server canister for liquid cooled server racks of TUFTY to utilize the canister design of GAO, the motivation would be to accommodate different server rack configurations (description of embodiments para. 13). Claims 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over TUFTY (US 20210153390 A1: Previously cited). Regarding Claim 16, TUFTY teaches a cooling system for a server rack (server rack shown in FIG. 8A, 8B, etc.), the cooling system comprising: an influent second manifold (supply manifolds 142 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B) including: a plurality of influent hoses (supply lines 146 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B); and a plurality of influent second manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings (supply manifold QD coupling 142f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) at respective ends of the influent hoses; an effluent second manifold (return manifolds 144 para. 0047 FIG. 8B) including: a plurality of effluent hoses (return lines 146 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B); and a plurality of effluent second manifold QD fittings (return manifold QD coupling 144f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) at respective ends of the effluent hoses; and a plurality of canisters (Chassis 122 and other related structures shown in fig. 10) configured to couple respective pluralities of servers (106 server shown in fig. 8B) to the server rack (server rack shown in FIG. 8A, 8B, etc.), each of the plurality of canisters including: a canister frame (U-shaped bracket 28 shown in fig. 5) including a rear wall (rear wall 40 para. 0034 shown in FIG. 4); an influent first manifold (Supply manifolds 42, 142, 216, etc.) attached to an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame (see Figure 5), the influent first manifold including a plurality of influent first manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings (cooling liquid inlet 208 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) arranged in fixed positions , and the influent first manifold being configured to couple with influent server QD fittings on the servers (supply server coupling 48b para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4); an effluent first manifold (return manifolds 44, 144, 218, etc) attached to the exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame (see Figure 5), the effluent first manifold including a plurality of effluent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid outlet 210 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) arranged in fixed positions , and the effluent first manifold being configured to couple with effluent server QD fittings on the servers (return server QD coupling 52b para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4); an influent canister QD fitting (supply canister QD coupling 48a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) disposed on the exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame (see in annotated FIG. 4 where the supply canister QD coupling 48a are disposed on an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame) and coupled with the influent first manifold (Supply manifolds 42, 142, 216, etc.), the influent canister QD fitting being configured to couple with one of the influent second manifold QD fittings (supply manifold QD coupling 142f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) of the influent second manifold (supply manifolds 142f para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B); and an effluent canister QD fitting (return canister QD coupling 52a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) disposed on the exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame (see in annotated FIG. 4 where the return canister QD coupling 52a are disposed on an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame) and coupled with the effluent first manifold (return manifolds 44, 144, 218, etc), the effluent canister QD fitting being configured to couple with one of the effluent second manifold QD fittings (return manifold QD coupling 144f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) of the effluent second manifold (return manifolds 144 para. 0047 FIG. 8B). TUFTY does not teach the plurality of influent first manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings passing through the rear wall of the canister frame and the plurality of effluent first manifold QD fittings passing through the rear wall of the canister frame. However, there is no evidence of record that establishes that changing the configuration of the plurality of influent first manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings and the plurality of effluent first manifold QD fittings would result in a difference in function of TUFTY’s device. Further, a person having ordinary skill in the art, being faced with modifying the configuration of the plurality of influent first manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings and the plurality of effluent first manifold QD fittings of TUFTY’s device, would have a reasonable expectation of success in making such a modification and it appears the device would function as intended being given the claimed configuration. Lastly, applicant has not disclosed that the claimed configuration solves any stated problem and therefore there appears to be no criticality placed on the locations as claimed such that it produces an unexpected result. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the configuration of the plurality of influent first manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings and the plurality of effluent first manifold QD fittings of TUFTY’s device to be passing through the rear wall of the canister frame as an obvious matter of design choice within the skill of the art. Regarding Claim 17, TUFTY further teaches wherein the influent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid inlet 208 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) and the effluent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid outlet 210 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) are arranged in respective linear arrays (FIG. 2). Regarding Claim 18, TUFTY further teaches wherein the canister frame (U-shaped bracket 28 shown in fig. 5) is configured to mount to the server rack (server rack shown in FIG. 8A, 8B, etc.). Regarding Claim 19, TUFTY further teaches wherein the influent second manifold (supply manifolds 142 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B) and the effluent second manifold (return manifolds 144 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B) are coupled with a second manifold frame (the rack 102 para. 0044 shown in FIG. 8B). Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over TUFTY (US 20210153390 A1: Previously cited). Regarding Claim 20, TUFTY teaches a server rack comprising: a server rack frame (server rack frame shown in FIG. 8A, 8B, etc.); an influent soft manifold (supply manifolds 142 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B) including: a plurality of influent hoses (supply lines 146 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B); and a plurality of influent soft manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings (supply manifold QD coupling 142f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) at respective ends of the influent hoses; an effluent soft manifold (return manifolds 144 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B) including: a plurality of effluent hoses (return lines 146 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B); and a plurality of effluent soft manifold QD fittings (supply manifold QD coupling 142f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) at respective ends of the effluent hoses; and a plurality of canisters (Chassis 122 and other related structures shown in fig. 10) configured to be mounted to the server rack frame, each canister configured to couple a plurality of servers (106 server shown in fig. 8B) to the server rack and including: a canister frame (U-shaped bracket 28 shown in fig. 5) including a rear wall (rear wall 40 para. 0034 shown in FIG. 4); an influent first manifold (Supply manifolds 42, 142, 216, etc.) attached to the rear wall of the canister frame (see Figure 5), the influent first manifold including a plurality of influent first manifold quick-disconnect (QD) fittings (cooling liquid inlet 208 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) arranged in fixed positions and configured to couple with influent server QD fittings on the servers (supply server coupling 48b para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4); an effluent first manifold (return manifolds 44, 144, 218, etc) attached to the rear wall of the canister frame (see Figure 5), the influent first manifold including a plurality of effluent first manifold QD fittings (cooling liquid outlet 210 configured with quick disconnect fluid couplers para. 0052 shown in FIG. 14) arranged in fixed positions and configured to couple with effluent server QD fittings on the servers (return server QD coupling 52b para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4); an influent canister QD fitting (supply canister QD coupling 48a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) disposed on an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame (see in annotated FIG. 4 where the supply canister QD coupling 48a are disposed on an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame) and coupled with the influent first manifold (Supply manifolds 42, 142, 216, etc.); the influent canister QD fitting being configured to couple with one of the influent second manifold QD fittings (supply manifold QD coupling 142f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) of the influent second manifold (supply manifolds 142 para. 0047 shown in FIG. 8B); and an effluent canister QD fitting (return canister QD coupling 52a para. 0034 shown in annotated FIG. 4) disposed on the exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame (see in annotated FIG. 4 where the return canister QD coupling 52a are disposed on an exterior side of the rear wall of the canister frame) and coupled with the effluent first manifold (return manifolds 44, 144, 218, etc), the effluent canister QD fitting being configured to couple with one of the effluent second manifold QD fittings (return manifold QD coupling 144f para. 0047 shown in annotated FIG. 8B) of the effluent second manifold (return manifolds 144 para. 0047 FIG. 8B). TUFTY does not teach the influent first manifold attached to an interior side of the rear wall of the canister frame and the effluent first manifold attached to the interior side of the rear wall of the canister frame. However, there is no evidence of record that establishes that changing the locations of the influent first manifold and the effluent first manifold would result in a difference in function of TUFTY’s device. Further, a person having ordinary skill in the art, being faced with modifying the locations of the influent first manifold and the effluent first manifold of TUFTY’s device, would have a reasonable expectation of success in making such a modification and it appears the device would function as intended being given the claimed locations. Lastly, applicant has not disclosed that the claimed locations solve any stated problem, indicating that the locations of the influent first manifold and the effluent first manifold “may” be disposed on either side of the rear wall (specification at para. [0040]) and therefore there appears to be no criticality placed on the locations as claimed such that it produces an unexpected result. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the influent first manifold and the effluent first manifold of TUFTY’s device to be attached to the interior side of the rear wall of the canister frame as an obvious matter of design choice within the skill of the art. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHALED AL SAMIRI whose telephone number is (571)272-8685. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30AM~3:30PM, M-F (E.S.T.). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jianying Atkisson can be reached at (571) 270-7740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHALED AHMED ALI AL SAMIRI/Examiner, Art Unit 3763 /JOEL M ATTEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 24, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 19, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757355
MAIN BODY SHEET FOR VAPOR CHAMBER, VAPOR CHAMBER, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750979
CLAMPED ANNEALED PYROLYTIC GRAPHITE HEAT SPREADING
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740017
VAPOR CHAMBER WITH DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTABLE LOCAL EVAPORATIVE RESISTANCE
4y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736255
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING GROUND-SOURCE HEAT PUMPS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12720709
EYEWEAR DEVICE WITH THERMAL VAPOR CHAMBER
4y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+59.4%)
3y 1m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month